Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 71 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 426 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Nuclear Cluster of the Milky Way: Total Mass and Luminosity (long version) (1406.7568v2)

Published 29 Jun 2014 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.IM

Abstract: Like many other late-type galaxies, the Milky Way contains a nuclear star cluster. In this work we obtain the basic properties of its dominant old stellar population. Firstly, we derive its structural properties by constructing a stellar surface density map of the central 1000" using extinction corrected star counts from VISTA, WFC3/IR and VLT/NACO data. We can describe the profile with a two-component model. The inner, slightly flattened (q=0.80+/-0.04) component is the nuclear cluster, while the outer component corresponds to the stellar component of the circumnuclear zone. We measure for the nuclear cluster a half-light radius of 178+/-51"~7+/-2 pc and a luminosity of M_Ks=-16.0+/-0.5. Secondly, we enlarge the range over which detailed dynamics are available from 1 pc to 4 pc. We obtain more than 10000 individual proper motions from NACO data, and more than 2500 radial velocities from VLT/SINFONI data. We determine the cluster mass by means of isotropic spherical Jeans modeling. We fix the distance to the Galactic Center and the mass of the supermassive black hole. We model the cluster either with a constant mass to light ratio or with a power law mass model. For the latter we obtain a slope of delta_M=1.18+/-0.06. Assuming spherical symmetry, we get a nuclear cluster mass within 100" of M_100"=6.09+/- 0.53_(fix_R_0) +/- 0.97_(R_0) * 106 M_sun for both modeling approaches. A model which includes the observed flattening gives a 47% larger mass, see Chatzopoulos et al. 2015. Our results slightly favor a core over a cusp in the mass profile. By minimizing the number of unbound stars within 8" in our sample we obtain a distance estimate of R$0=8.53{+0.21}{-0.15}$ kpc, where an a priori relation between R_0 and SMBH mass from stellar orbits is used. Combining our mass and flux we obtain M/L=0.51+/-0.12 M_sun/L_(sun Ks). This is roughly consistent with a Chabrier IMF.

Citations (65)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.