Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 80 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 60 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 87 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 173 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Bijections for pairs of non-crossing lattice paths and walks in the plane (1406.1709v1)

Published 6 Jun 2014 in math.CO

Abstract: It is a classical result in combinatorics that among lattice paths with 2m steps U=(1,1) and D=(1,-1) starting at the origin, the number of those that do not go below the x-axis equals the number of those that end on the x-axis. A much more unfamiliar fact is that the analogous equality obtained by replacing single paths with k-tuples of non-crossing paths holds for every k. This result has appeared in the literature in different contexts involving plane partitions (where it was proved by Proctor), partially ordered sets, Young tableaux, and lattice walks, but no bijective proof for k>1 seems to be known. In this paper we give a bijective proof of the equality for k=2, showing that for pairs of non-crossing lattice paths with 2m steps U and D, the number of those that do not go below the x-axis equals the number of those that end on the x-axis. Translated in terms of walks in the plane starting at the origin with 2m unit steps in the four coordinate directions, our work provides correspondences among those constrained to the first octant, those constrained to the first quadrant that end on the x-axis, and those in the upper half-plane that end at the origin. Our bijections, which are defined in more generality, also prove new results where different endpoints are allowed, and they give a bijective proof of the formula for the number of walks in the first octant that end on the diagonal, partially answering a question of Bousquet-M\'elou and Mishna.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.