Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 166 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 436 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Seymour's Decomposition Theorem (1403.7757v1)

Published 30 Mar 2014 in math.CO

Abstract: Let $\mathcal M$ be a class of matroids closed under minors and isomorphism. Let $N$ be a matroid in $\mathcal M$ with an exact $k$-separation $(A, B)$. We say $N$ is a $k$-decomposer for $\mathcal M$ having $(A, B)$ as an inducer, if every matroid $M\in \mathcal M$ having $N$ as a minor has a $k$-separation $(X, Y)$ such that, $A\subseteq X$ and $B\subseteq Y$. Seymour [3, 9.1] proved that a matroid $N$ is a $k$-decomposer for an excluded-minor class, if certain conditions are met for all 3-connected matroids $M$ in the class, where $|E(M)-E(N)|\le 2$. We reinterpret Seymour's Theorem in terms of the connectivity function and give a check-list that is easier to implement because case-checking is reduced.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.