Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 67 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Ion-size effects on cuprate High Temperature Superconductors (1310.3055v1)

Published 11 Oct 2013 in cond-mat.supr-con

Abstract: There are two general ways to compress the cuprates, by external pressure or by internal pressure as induced by isovalent-ion substitution. Paradoxically, they have the opposite effect on the superconducting transition temperature. This thesis seeks to understand the salient difference between these two pressures. We study three families of cuprates where the ion size can be systematically altered; Bi$2$(Sr${1.6-x}$A$x$)Ln${0.4}$CuO${6+ \delta}$, ACuO$_2 $ and LnBa${2-x} $Sr$x $Cu$_3 $O${7-\delta} $ where Ln is a Lanthenide or Y and A={Mg,Ca,Sr,Ba}. We use a variety of techniques to explore our paradox, for example; Raman spectroscopy to measure the antiferromagnetic exchange energy and energy gaps, Density Functional Theory to calculate the density of states, Muon Spin Relaxation to measure the superfluid density as well as a variety of more conventional techniques to synthesize and characterise our samples. Our Raman studies show that an energy scale for spin fluctuations cannot resolve the different effects of the two pressures. Similarly the density of states, while an important property, does not clearly resolve the paradox. Our superfluid density measurements show that the disorder resulting from isovalent-ion substitution is secondary in importance for the superconducting transition temperature. Instead, we find that the polarisability is a key property of the cuprates with regard to superconductivity. This understanding resolves the paradox! It implies that electron pairing results from either (i) a short-range interaction where the polarisability screens repulsive longer-range interactions and/or (ii) the relatively unexplored idea of the exchange of quantized, coherent polarisation waves. More generally, we have also demonstrated the utility of studying ion-size effects to further our collective understanding of the cuprates.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.