Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Bregman Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (1306.3203v3)

Published 13 Jun 2013 in math.OC, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: The mirror descent algorithm (MDA) generalizes gradient descent by using a Bregman divergence to replace squared Euclidean distance. In this paper, we similarly generalize the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to Bregman ADMM (BADMM), which allows the choice of different Bregman divergences to exploit the structure of problems. BADMM provides a unified framework for ADMM and its variants, including generalized ADMM, inexact ADMM and Bethe ADMM. We establish the global convergence and the $O(1/T)$ iteration complexity for BADMM. In some cases, BADMM can be faster than ADMM by a factor of $O(n/\log(n))$. In solving the linear program of mass transportation problem, BADMM leads to massive parallelism and can easily run on GPU. BADMM is several times faster than highly optimized commercial software Gurobi.

Citations (199)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

Bregman Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers

The paper introduces Bregman Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (BADMM), an extension of the standard Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). BADMM offers a general framework that allows different Bregman divergences to replace the quadratic Euclidean distance penalties typically employed in ADMM. This generalization serves to leverage the problem structure effectively, enhancing convergence properties and potentially improving computational efficiencies in certain contexts.

At the core, BADMM maintains the primary objective of solving optimization problems involving composite functions subject to constraints. The motivation stems from the enhanced performance observed when gradient-type methods employ Bregman divergences. Extending this concept to ADMM, BADMM allows users to implement tailored penalty terms, taking advantage of the diversity and flexibility provided by various Bregman divergences, such as the squared Euclidean distance and the Kullback-Leibler divergence.

The authors rigorously establish the global convergence of BADMM, proving that it retains the O(1/T)O(1/T) iteration complexity characteristic of ADMM under suitable conditions. Notably, BADMM can surpass ADMM’s performance by a factor of O(n/log(n))O(n/\log(n)), where nn represents the dimensionality of the problem. This improvement is most notable in settings where the structure of the problem allows for significant exploitation through appropriate divergence choices. The theoretical aspects are substantiated by experimental evaluations on the mass transportation problem, a classical example where BADMM demonstrates superior performance not only over ADMM but also against leading commercial solvers like Gurobi, especially when executed on GPU architectures. The experiments highlight BADMM's proficiency in leveraging parallelism to solve large-scale linear programs efficiently.

Key implications of the research are manifold. For practitioners, the ability to select and employ non-quadratic penalty terms allows for computational strategies finely tuned to specific application requirements. This customization can lead to significant computational savings in distributed and parallel computational environments. Moreover, the robust theoretical backing provides confidence in the method's convergence guarantees.

From a theoretical standpoint, BADMM's general framework potentially stimulates further exploration into adaptive penalty strategies, particularly in areas such as distributed optimization and machine learning where problem structures are increasingly varied and complex. This versatility encourages the development and analysis of more specialized algorithms under the broader umbrella of BADMM, possibly yielding insights that extend beyond those achieved with traditional ADMM approaches.

Speculation about future developments in AI should consider the potential for BADMM to contribute to more efficient large-scale data analysis frameworks. Its adaptation to various divergences provides a fertile ground for innovation in algorithmic design, particularly as AI confronts challenges related to scalability and efficient resource use. The convergence properties and flexibility of BADMM might make it an attractive choice for developing next-generation optimization solvers. Importantly, BADMM underscores the role of problem structure in optimization, suggesting a shift toward more adaptive and context-aware methodological approaches in AI research and applications.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.