Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (1302.3697v2)

Published 15 Feb 2013 in cs.DL, physics.soc-ph, and stat.AP

Abstract: Although bibliometrics has been a separate research field for many years, there is still no uniformity in the way bibliometric analyses are applied to individual researchers. Therefore, this study aims to set up proposals how to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences. 2005 saw the introduction of the h index, which gives information about a researcher's productivity and the impact of his or her publications in a single number (h is the number of publications with at least h citations); however, it is not possible to cover the multidimensional complexity of research performance and to undertake inter-personal comparisons with this number. This study therefore includes recommendations for a set of indicators to be used for evaluating researchers. Our proposals relate to the selection of data on which an evaluation is based, the analysis of the data and the presentation of the results.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Lutz Bornmann (158 papers)
  2. Werner Marx (25 papers)
Citations (125)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.