Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 62 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 78 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 423 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 33 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Dominance of Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables in the Resolved Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission of the Limiting Window (1209.1725v1)

Published 8 Sep 2012 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: The diffuse appearance of the Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE) has been puzzling since its discovery due to lack of compelling theories for sustainable hot diffuse X-ray emission in the Galactic plane. Recently (Revnivtsev et al. 2009; R09) claimed that about 90% of the 6.5-7.1 keV X-ray flux from a small section of a low extinction region at 1.4 degree south of the Galactic Center has been resolved to discrete sources with 2-10 keV L_X > 4x10{-16} erg s cm-2, using ultra-deep (1 Ms) Chandra ACIS-I observations. They also concluded thatcoronally active stars such as active binaries (ABs) contribute about 60% of the resolved flux. However, our recent discovery of a large population of magnetic cataclysmic variables (MCVs) in the same region suggests their significant role in the resolved hard X-ray flux. In addition, deep X-ray surveys of other several Galactic Bulge fields over the past decade have indicated that MCVs are likely the major contributor in the hard X-ray emission above 2-3 keV. To solve this mystery, we have conducted an independent indepth analysis of discrete X-ray sources in the low extinction region. The total fraction of the 6.5-7.1 keV flux we can confidently claim as resolved is 70-80%, which largely agrees with R09 but leaves some room for diffuse components. However, despite the various attempts, we consistently find that the resolved hard X-ray flux above 3 keV is dominated by relatively bright, hard X-ray sources such as MCVs, whereas the contribution from relatively faint, soft sources such as ABs is below 20%. We describe in detail our analysis procedure in order to elucidate possible origins of the discrepancy.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.