Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 118 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 181 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 429 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The metallicity distribution of bulge clump giants in Baade's Window (1107.5199v1)

Published 26 Jul 2011 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We seek to constrain the formation of the Galactic bulge by means of analysing the detailed chemical composition of a large sample of red clump stars in Baade's window. We measure [Fe/H] in a sample of 219 bulge red clump stars from R=20000 resolution spectra obtained with FLAMES/GIRAFFE at the VLT, using an automatic procedure, differentially to the metal-rich local reference star muLeo. For a subsample of 162 stars, we also derive [Mg/H] from spectral synthesis around the MgI triplet at 6319A. The Fe and Mg metallicity distributions are both asymmetric, with median values of +0.16 and +0.21 respectively. The iron distribution is clearly bimodal, as revealed both by a deconvolution (from observational errors) and a Gaussian decomposition. The decomposition of the observed Fe and Mg metallicity distributions into Gaussian components yields two populations of equal sizes (50% each): a metal-poor component centred around [Fe/H]=-0.30 and [Mg/H]=-0.06 with a large dispersion and a narrow metal-rich component centred around [Fe/H]=+0.32 and [Mg/H]=+0.35. The metal poor component shows high [Mg/Fe] ratios (around 0.3) whereas stars in the metal rich component are found to have near solar ratios. Babusiaux et al. (2010) also find kinematical differences between the two components: the metal poor component shows kinematics compatible with an old spheroid whereas the metal rich component is consistent with a population supporting a bar. In view of their chemical and kinematical properties, we suggest different formation scenarios for the two populations: a rapid formation timescale as an old spheroid for the metal poor component (old bulge) and for the metal rich component, a formation over a longer time scale driven by the evolution of the bar (pseudo-bulge).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.