Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems

Published 20 Jan 2011 in cs.CC, cs.FL, and quant-ph | (1101.3837v2)

Abstract: In this note, we present an infinite family of promise problems which can be solved exactly by just tuning transition amplitudes of a two-state quantum finite automata operating in realtime mode, whereas the size of the corresponding classical automata grow without bound.

Citations (58)

Summary

Analysis of the Superiority of Exact Quantum Automata for Promise Problems

This paper by Andris Ambainis and Abuzer Yakaryılmaz explores the comparative efficiency of quantum finite automata (QFAs) versus classical deterministic finite automata (DFAs) in solving promise problems. The authors introduce an infinite family of promise problems that can be solved exactly using two-state quantum finite automata, while their classical counterparts—the DFAs—require a number of states that grows unboundedly.

Key Contributions

The primary contribution of this paper lies in demonstrating the succinctness and efficiency of quantum computation for specific computational scenarios known as promise problems. A promise problem comprises two disjoint sets of input strings, $A_{yes}$ and $A_{no}$, with the condition that any given string belongs to either $A_{yes}$ or $A_{no}$ but not both.

Results and Technical Insights

  1. Quantum vs Classical Automata:

    • The authors present an exact solution to a family of promise problems using a two-state Moore-Crutchfield quantum finite automaton (MCQFA).
    • A classical DFA, however, necessitates a minimum of $2{k+1}$ states to solve the same problem, where $k$ is a parameter defining the problem size. This highlights a scenario where quantum automata exhibit significantly greater efficiency in terms of state requirements.
  2. Promise Problems Structure:

    The paper leverages unary languages forming the sets $A_{yes}k$ and $A_{no}k$. Here, the membership within these sets is determined based on whether the exponent of the unary string matches an even or odd multiplier of a power of two, respectively. This construct shows that quantum automata can efficiently exploit patterns tied to periodicity and rotational symmetry inherent in quantum operations.

  3. Mathematical Framework and Proofs:

    The proof utilizes the well-known technique of amplitude rotations to construct MCQFAs that solve these promise problems efficiently. The efficiency of quantum automata is grounded in the periodicity of states within the QFA induced by these rotations.

Implications and Future Research

The implications of this paper are substantial regarding the theoretical extension of quantum computing superiority in fields like automata theory, particularly for problems bounded by specific computational promises.

  • Theoretical Implications:

    This research suggests potential for quantum automata to provide exponential savings in computational resources for a certain class of problems, thus expanding our understanding of quantum model capabilities.

  • Practical Implications:

    The findings could influence the design of efficient algorithms in quantum computing, particularly in areas where state resources are constrained and problem instances align with unary languages or promise problems.

Speculations on Future AI Developments

As quantum computing continues to evolve, further research into the practical scalability of quantum automata models for promise problems could unlock new efficiencies in computational tasks associated with AI. The techniques demonstrated here could inform future developments in AI algorithms that would benefit from such quantum speed-ups, enhancing computational handling of large datasets processed through specific problem constraints.

In conclusion, this paper enriches the discourse on quantum computation's benefits over traditional models, especially for promise problems, setting a precedent for future explorations into domain-specific applications where quantum methods yield significant advantages.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.