Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 168 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 122 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Agreement Maintenance Based on Schema and Ontology Change in P2P Environment (1003.3082v1)

Published 16 Mar 2010 in cs.AI and cs.DB

Abstract: This paper is concern about developing a semantic agreement maintenance method based on semantic distance by calculating the change of local schema or ontology. This approach is important in dynamic and autonomous environment, in which the current approach assumed that agreement or mapping in static environment. The contribution of this research is to develop a framework based on semantic agreement maintenance approach for P2P environment. This framework based on two level hybrid P2P model architecture, which consist of two peer type: (1) super peer that use to register and manage the other peers, and (2) simple peer, as a simple peer, it exports and shares its contents with others. This research develop a model to maintain the semantic agreement in P2P environment, so the current approach which does not have the mechanism to know the change, since it assumed that ontology and local schema are in the static condition, and it is different in dynamic condition. The main issues are how to calculate the change of local schema or common ontology and the calculation result is used to determine which algorithm in maintaining the agreement. The experiment on the job matching domain in Indonesia have been done to show how far the performance of the approach. From the experiment, the main result are (i) the more change so the F-measure value tend to be decreased, (ii) there is no significant different in F-measure value for various modification type (add, delete, rename), and (iii) the correct choice of algorithm would improve the F-measure value.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.