Primitive Idempotents in Minimal Ideals
- Primitive idempotents of minimal ideals are irreducible elements that generate minimal left, right, or two-sided ideals in various algebraic structures.
- They are constructed via methods in Clifford algebras, recursive techniques in monoids, and explicit character-theoretic formulas in group algebras.
- These idempotents reveal deep links between algebraic decompositions, symmetry groups, and computational applications in coding theory and categorical frameworks.
Primitive idempotents of minimal ideals are fundamental structural elements in a wide spectrum of algebraic systems, providing the irreducible building blocks for decompositions, representation theory, and module structure. Their role is especially prominent in settings where minimal one-sided ideals are characterized by their generation via primitive idempotents, and where the interplay with symmetries, stabilizers, and anti-involutions yields deep theoretical and practical ramifications.
1. Characterization and Construction in Clifford Algebras
In real Clifford algebras with signature , a primitive idempotent is an element satisfying and not expressible as the sum of two nonzero orthogonal idempotents. Such are systematically constructed as products of mutually commuting monomials with : A complete set of mutually annihilating primitive idempotents , derived via conjugation by monomials in the Salingaros vee group , sums to the unity. Each generates a distinct minimal left ideal , forming the spinor spaces parametrized by the signature. The structure of these idempotents directly encodes the underlying division ring (where , , or ), and the classification of stabilizer subgroups of —normal in with explicit order and abelian/nonabelian nature depending on —is essential for constructing spinor bases and for the analysis of module automorphisms.
The unique transposition anti-involution defined on satisfies for basis monomials and leaves primitive idempotents fixed (). It induces on spinor representations a matrix conjugation: with real, complex, or quaternionic structure. The anti-involution further defines a new intrinsic spinor norm that is invariant under a subgroup , and typically distinct from other classical norms () in the literature. The totality of these facts provides a robust mechanism for describing minimal ideals, their automorphism groups, and intrinsic pairings within Clifford module categories (1005.3558).
2. Recursive and Explicit Construction in Monoids and Group Algebras
R-Trivial Monoids
For finite R-trivial (and, by equivalence, weakly ordered) monoids, the collection of primitive idempotents in the monoid algebra is recursively constructed via:
- Canonically defined "level" elements (products of idempotents at or below level in an associated finite semilattice ),
- Annihilators removing contributions from higher levels,
- Polynomials isolating desired terms,
- Recursive subtraction: .
This system yields pairwise orthogonal idempotents that project onto indecomposable projective modules, with applications including the $0$-Hecke algebra representations and left regular bands. The minimal left ideals correspond to projective covers and are central to the computation of Cartan invariants and the structure of the quiver for (1009.4943).
Finite Group Algebras
For semisimple group algebras of nilpotent groups , the central idempotent associated to a simple component is constructed using strong Shoda pairs and cyclotomic classes. Primitive central idempotents are then refined to orthogonal primitive idempotents via explicit "factored" elements—e.g., by conjugating an explicitly built idempotent over a suitable transversal in relative to the stabilizer of a component. In matrix language, preimages of matrix units in the Wedderburn block yield a complete set of minimal one-sided ideals with explicit generators. These constructions do not rely on full character theory and have practical implementations in computational algebra, coding theory, and the explicit structural analysis of group rings (Gelder et al., 2013, Dai et al., 2022).
In dihedral and quaternionic group algebras, explicit primitive decompositions are realized using matrix representations and trigonometric identities derived from character table orthogonality, and the preimages of matrix units correspond bijectively to minimal ideals (Dai et al., 2022).
3. Inversion Formulas and Canonical Bases in Trivial Source Algebras
The construction of primitive idempotents in the trivial source algebra follows a Gluck–Yoshida–type inversion, expressing each primitive idempotent as a linear combination of canonical basis elements : where is a Möbius function related to reduced Euler characteristics of certain -subgroup posets and irreducible Brauer characters run over normalizers . This inversion provides a direct combinatorial and character-theoretic description of the minimal ideals and connects the expansion of canonical modules to both local subgroup data and topological poset invariants. Matrix representations of morphisms between rings (e.g., linearization maps) are likewise given explicitly in terms of character values and reduced Euler characteristics, establishing a tight link between combinatorics, character theory, and primitive idempotents (Barker, 2018).
4. Modular and Categorical Contexts
Modular Representation Theory
For finite semisimple algebras (e.g., Schur rings, trivial source algebras), primitive idempotents correspond to minimal two-sided ideals, directly yielding the Wedderburn decomposition: where are primitive central idempotents, usually constructed explicitly from the semilattice of normal subgroups or via character-theoretic means. In the case of Schur rings over cyclic groups, these idempotents are indexed by normal subgroups and are formulated in terms of products of normalized subgroup sums, providing a field-theoretic description of minimal components (Misseldine, 2013).
Algebraic and Differential Categories
In the category of character sheaves on solvable groups, minimal idempotents correspond to "admissible pairs," with conjectural equivalence for more general groups. These idempotents partition the triangulated monoidal category into manageable blocks, central to categorical representation theory and the realization of character sheaves (Deshpande, 2013).
5. Generalized and Topological Settings
Semigroups and Pseudo-Finite Structures
In pseudo-finite semigroups with a completely simple minimal ideal , idempotents in are automatically primitive: each generates a minimal left (or right) ideal and sits in a unique -class (or -class). The Rees matrix structure allows one to index these minimal ideals and coordinate their interaction via group-like mechanisms. Conditions for pseudo-finiteness (e.g., finiteness of certain index sets) ensure that only finitely many primitive idempotents arise, controlling the combinatorics of the minimal ideal and its representation (Gould et al., 2022).
C*-Algebras and Dixmier Ideals
In general C*-algebras, an ideal is semiprime if and only if it is idempotent (i.e., ). Such semiprime/primitive ideals are necessarily self-adjoint. The theory of Dixmier ideals provides a systematic lens for squeezing arbitrary ideals between "regular" (hereditary, strongly invariant) ones, and the closure under positive square roots is a key feature of these structures. The Pedersen ideal exemplifies a norm-dense, semiprime ideal populated by minimal idempotent-like elements analogous to primitive idempotents in the algebraic (non-topological) sense (Gardella et al., 2023, Kaftal et al., 2017).
Central Idempotents in Compactifications
In topological algebra, primitive idempotents in compactifications such as the weakly almost periodic (WAP) compactification correspond to unique elements in minimal ideals associated to minimal group compactifications. These central idempotents act as projections onto primary components of representation spaces and function algebras, canonically splitting WAP algebras and Fourier–Stieltjes algebras according to invariant topologies (Spronk, 2018).
6. Polynomial and Module-Theoretic Frameworks
Two-Dimensional Algebras
For two-dimensional algebras, primitive idempotents are parameterized by the solutions to specific cubic or quadratic polynomials determined by the structure constants. Each nontrivial minimal left ideal arises as the span of a primitive idempotent, and the classification of such algebras rests upon the nature and multiplicity of solutions to these defining polynomials (Ahmed et al., 2018).
Quotient Rings and Coding Theory
In the context of rings , for a coprime factorization , primitive idempotents are constructed by Bézout identities: with , . These idempotents decompose the ring as a direct sum of indecomposable local rings, and any module/ideal (such as a constacyclic code) is coordinatized via these minimal components (Charkani et al., 2019).
7. Generalized Notions: Quasi-Absorbing and A-Primitive Elements in Semigroups
In semigroup theory, the primitive idempotents relative to a given ideal are those that are minimal above in the Rees order: an idempotent is -primitive if every idempotent is either itself or lies in . This perspective generalizes the classical notion to incorporate the "pruning" effect of absorbing/quasi-absorbing elements, which is operationally necessary in contexts such as set optimization, where minimal "non-trivial" idempotents describe efficient frontiers or structural limits (Hager et al., 2023).
In summary, primitive idempotents of minimal ideals serve as irreducible, often canonically constructed, generators of minimal (left/right/two-sided) ideals in rings, algebras, monoids, and semigroups. Their explicit construction, classification, and interaction with symmetry groups, structural anti-involutions, and poset invariants provide a unifying framework for deep theoretical analysis and computational applications across algebra, representation theory, coding theory, operator algebras, and categorical settings.