Output Equivalence Rate (OER)

• Output Equivalence Rate (OER) is a quantitative metric that defines the degree of functional similarity across different system configurations and experimental trials.
• It is applied in areas such as communication systems, control design, and catalyst screening to assess resource allocation, fault tolerance, and electrochemical efficiency.
• Mathematical and empirical approaches to OER provide rigorous methods for validating output invariance in systems ranging from software algorithms to renewable energy technologies.

Output Equivalence Rate (OER) is a concept that appears in numerous scientific domains as a quantitative measure of how closely the functional output of algorithms, systems, or experimental designs coincides under varying conditions or representations. Depending on context, it can denote throughput, measurement accuracy, algorithmic or behavioral invariance, or functional similarity across repeated trials or system configurations. The following sections delineate the rigorous technical foundations, mathematical formalisms, and implications of OER across representative areas including signal processing, system identification, computational equivalence, control, software engineering, and electrochemical catalysis.

1. Formal Definition and General Frameworks

OER always quantifies functional output similarity or equivalence. In system theory, OER captures whether different system realizations (e.g., with distinct internal states, fault signatures, or parameterizations) produce identical output trajectories for admissible inputs, typically formalized as

$$\mathrm{OER} = \frac{|\{\text{inputs } x : f(x) = g(x)\}|}{|\{\text{all tested inputs } x\}|}$$

where $f$ and $g$ are mappings from input to output under different configurations. In communication systems (e.g., multi-code CDMA (Yun et al., 2012)), OER is the effective rate (bits per chip/dimension) achieved by optimal resource allocation, and is expressible as the sum rate normalized by available resources.

In control design, OER manifests as functional equivalence in tracking outputs or disturbance rejection: two controllers are output equivalent when their closed-loop responses are identical (up to transformations such as pre-filtering or gain scaling) (Madonski et al., 2022).

2. OER in Signal Processing and Communication Systems

For multi-code CDMA systems (Yun et al., 2012), the sum-rate optimization problem admits a resource allocation equivalence to restricted FDMA/TDMA, resulting in an explicit OER formula:

$$\mathrm{OER} = \sum_{k=1}^{K_1}\frac{\bar{n}_k}{2N}\ln\left(1+\frac{Np_k}{2\sigma^2\bar{n}_k}\right) + \frac{N-\sum_{k=1}^{K_1}\bar{n}_k}{2N} \ln \left(1+\frac{N\sum_{k=K_1+1}^Kp_k}{2\sigma^2(N-\sum_{k=1}^{K_1}\bar{n}_k)}\right)$$

where parameters encode power profile, maximum allowed codes/streams per user ($\bar{n}_k$), system processing gain ($N$), and noise variance ($\sigma^2$). This quantifies spectral efficiency (bits per chip/dimension), thus directly operationalizing OER as throughput equivalence under optimal design.

3. OER in System Identification and Fault Modeling

In analytical system identification (Gleizer, 19 May 2025), output behavior equivalence is formalized via the output behavior set $B$:

$$B = \{ r : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}^{n_y} \mid N(q) r = 0 \}$$

where $N(q)$ is constructed from the system's polynomial kernel and encodes all admissible output trajectories under both nominal and fault-induced dynamics. Two systems are output equivalent if their behavior sets coincide ($B = B'$). The identification process—typically using subspace methods such as PI-MOESP—yields system matrices ($A, B, C, D$) and reconstructs the minimal dimension fault signature, ensuring output equivalence even if internal representations differ (up to a change of basis/scaling).

4. OER Metrics in Computational Equivalence and Software Engineering

In automated software bug fixing with LLMs (Er et al., 8 Sep 2025), OER quantifies functional similarity of program variants:

$$\mathrm{OER}(P, Q) = \frac{|\{ i \in I : P(i) = Q(i) \}|}{|I|}$$

where $I$ is a test set, and $P, Q$ are candidate programs (e.g., model outputs at different temperatures). Empirical results show OER decreases with increased LLM randomness, revealing instability in functional correctness. High OER is essential for adopting LLM outputs in CI/CD pipelines—serving as an admission criterion for patch acceptance.

5. Mathematical Approaches to OER: Differential Algebra and Equivalence Checking

In model identifiability via differential algebra (Eisenberg, 2013), input-output equivalence guarantees identical identifiability class:

• If two models produce the same input-output mapping ($y(t) = h(t, u, p)$), their parameter identifiability properties coincide.
• Techniques such as substitution, differential Gröbner bases, and characteristic set elimination produce the same generalized input-output equations, thus preserving OER in the sense of coefficient identifiability.

In equivalence decision for linear tree transducers (Löbel et al., 2020), OER ties directly to computational equivalence, relying on output cancellation in the free group. Efficient polynomial-time procedures exploit commutation and cancellation properties to decide output equivalence across all admissible inputs, inherently quantifying OER as a decision outcome.

6. OER in Experimental Physics and Catalysis

OER is also the canonical abbreviation for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction, probed electrochemically in catalyst research. Here, OER performance is assessed via overpotential, Tafel slope, and catalytic current density (often normalized as current at a benchmark overpotential):

• In Fe-doped CuO (Baral et al., 7 Dec 2024), OER onset at 1.49 V vs RHE, overpotential 338 mV at 10 mA/cm², and Tafel slope 69 mV/dec indicate enhanced kinetics and catalytic equivalence (relative to undoped or noble-metal systems).
• Similar principles apply in perovskite catalyst discovery (Wang et al., 2023), where descriptors (e.g., number of d electrons, oxidation state) enable high-throughput OER activity screening.

In such contexts, OER quantifies system output equivalence in terms of electrochemical efficiency—providing a universal, data-driven metric for comparing catalyst systems.

7. Practical Applications and Implications

The OER framework is central to:

• Resource-optimal design of communication systems (rate, complexity, spectral efficiency) (Yun et al., 2012)
• Fault-tolerant system identification, digital twins, and robust control under additive disturbances (Gleizer, 19 May 2025, Madonski et al., 2022)
• Algorithmic validation in automated software correction under model stochasticity (Er et al., 8 Sep 2025)
• Electrochemical screening and rational catalyst engineering for renewable energy and environmental remediation (Baral et al., 7 Dec 2024, Wang et al., 2023)

In all domains, OER guides the selection, verification, and optimization of algorithms, systems, or experimental paradigms with respect to output invariance or equivalence.

---

In summary, Output Equivalence Rate (OER) is a rigorously quantifiable metric that characterizes output similarity, invariance, or optimality in systems ranging from signal processing and dynamical systems to electrochemical catalysis and computational verification. Its mathematical instantiations—rate formulas, equivalence sets, identifiability tests, and empirical ratios—are domain-specific, but share a common role in certifying the functional equivalence or efficiency of diverse scientific systems and algorithms.