Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 181 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Model-Theoretic Definable Binding Groups

Updated 31 August 2025
  • Model-Theoretic Definable Binding Groups are invariants in definable groups that capture the failure of definable connectedness and the complexity of group orbits using canonical type-definable subgroups.
  • They provide a model-theoretic analogue to classical topological dynamics by realizing universal definable compactifications and ambits through logical structures like G*/(G*)00 and S_G(M).
  • The framework bridges definable dynamics with topological group theory, linking amenability and extreme amenability to properties of minimal subflows and semigroup operations in type spaces.

A model-theoretic definable binding group is a group-theoretic invariant arising in the context of a structure MM and a definable group GMnG \subseteq M^n, used to analyze compactifications, flows, and topological dynamics by means of model-theoretic and definability concepts. Definable binding groups precisely capture, in a canonical model-theoretic way, the failure of definable connectedness, the complexity of orbits in definable group actions, and the structure of compactifications of GG that are definable in MM. Their paper underlies the theory of definable topological dynamics, with deep connections to amenability, extreme amenability, and Ellis semigroup theory.

1. Definable Compactification via Model Theory

The universal definable compactification of a group GG definable in a structure MM is realized as the quotient G/(G)00G^*/(G^*)_{00}, where GG^* is the interpretation of GG in a sufficiently saturated elementary extension MM^*, and (G)00(G^*)_{00} (or sometimes (G)00,M(G^*)_{00,M}) denotes the smallest type-definable (over MM) normal subgroup of GG^* of bounded index. The logic topology, in which closed sets are type-definable over MM, makes G/(G)00G^*/(G^*)_{00} a compact Hausdorff group. A definable compactification of GG is a definable homomorphism h:GCh: G \to C to a compact group CC with dense image, and there is always a universal such compactification, namely G/(G)00G^* / (G^*)_{00} with its naturally induced structure. This construction serves as the model-theoretic analogue of the classical Bohr compactification for definable groups (Gismatullin et al., 2012).

2. Definable G-flows and Universal Ambits

A definable GG-flow consists of a continuous action of GG on a compact Hausdorff space XX where, for each xXx \in X, the orbit map ggxg \mapsto g \cdot x is definable in MM (i.e., preimages of closed sets under these maps are type-definable in GG). If all complete types over MM concentrating on GG are definable, the natural action of GG on its type space SG(M)S_G(M) is definable, and SG(M)S_G(M) (endowed with the Stone topology) becomes the universal definable GG-ambit. That is, every definable GG-ambit factors uniquely and continuously through SG(M)S_G(M), with the distinguished point corresponding to the type of the identity element (Gismatullin et al., 2012).

3. Minimal Flows and the Role of the Semigroup Structure

Within SG(M)S_G(M), minimal subflows (closed, GG-invariant, minimal as such) exist by compactness and correspond to universal minimal definable GG-flows. The semigroup operation * on SG(M)S_G(M), given by pq=tp(ab/M)p * q = \mathrm{tp}(a b / M) for realizations apa \models p and bqb \models q in a monster model, structures SG(M)S_G(M) as a left topological semigroup. This structure ensures the existence and uniqueness (up to GG-space isomorphism) of universal minimal definable GG-flows: minimal left ideals in the semigroup correspond to minimal subflows of SG(M)S_G(M) and any GG-map between minimal subflows is an isomorphism (Gismatullin et al., 2012).

4. Amenability, Extreme Amenability, and Genericity

Amenability in the definable context is formulated as the existence of a GG-invariant Borel probability measure on any definable GG-flow. Extreme amenability requires every definable GG-flow to have a fixed point, equivalent to SG(M)S_G(M) admitting a GG-invariant type. The latter can be characterized combinatorially: GG is definably extremely amenable iff every definable left-generic subset YGY \subseteq G (one whose finitely many left translates cover GG) satisfies YY1=GY \cdot Y^{-1} = G. This characterizes definable extreme amenability using structural properties of definable sets in GG (Gismatullin et al., 2012).

5. Model-Theoretic Perspective on Topological Groups

For a classical topological group GG seen as a structure MM (with additional predicates for open subsets), the universal (Bohr) compactification and the universal GG-ambit can also be described using model-theoretic notions: in a sufficiently saturated MM^*, the intersection of all interpretations UU^* of open neighborhoods UU of the identity gives a type-definable subgroup NN such that G/NG^*/N (with the logic topology) is compact. Similarly, the universal GG-ambit is obtained as a quotient of GG^* by the finest bounded, type-definable over MM equivalence relation compatible with the right uniformity. This shows model-theoretic compactification generalizes and encompasses the fundamental constructions of topological group theory (Gismatullin et al., 2012).

6. Integrating Model-Theoretic and Topological Dynamical Notions

The model-theoretic machinery provides a unified language for both definable and classical topological dynamics: compactifications, actions, flows, and the connection with amenability are all encoded via type spaces, definable maps, and type-definable subgroups. The passage from GG to G/(G)00G^*/(G^*)_{00} canonically captures the "maximal definable compactification," while SG(M)S_G(M) and its minimal subflows reflect the universality properties of (minimal) dynamical systems in the definable category. Amenability and extreme amenability become expressible in terms of properties of types and definable subsets, underpinning the translation of classical group-theoretic dynamical information into the model-theoretic context.

7. Summary Table of Central Objects

Model-Theoretic Notion Topological Analogue Description
G/(G)00G^*/(G^*)_{00} Bohr compactification Universal definable compactification
SG(M)S_G(M) Universal GG-ambit (Samuel compact) Stone space of types, universal flow
Minimal subflow of SG(M)S_G(M) Universal minimal flow Unique up to GG-space isomorphism
Definably amenable Amenable group Invariant Borel probability measures
Definably extremely amenable Extremely amenable group Fixed points in all GG-flows

Each concept and quotient reflects, when interpreted through the lens of definability and types, a canonical and rigid model-theoretic object mirroring its topological counterpart. The machinery thus provides precise tools to analyze, compactify, and measure the size and complexity of the "binding group" that encapsulates the definable dynamics of GG.


The model-theoretic theory of definable binding groups, as detailed in (Gismatullin et al., 2012), thereby offers a comprehensive approach to understanding compactifications, flows, minimality, and invariant measures for groups definable in first-order theories, highlighting the interaction between algebra, topology, and logic, and positioning model theory as a natural setting for generalized topological dynamics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)