Left-Hand-Side Uncertainty (LHS-WJCC)

• Left-Hand-Side Uncertainty (LHS-WJCC) is a framework where uncertainty multiplies decision variables in constraints, fundamentally affecting model tractability.
• It is pivotal in distributionally robust optimization, robust control, and uncertainty quantification across applications like power systems and spectral theory.
• Recent methodologies, including FICA and quantile-based tightening, deliver efficient inner convex approximations and notable computational speedups for complex systems.

Left-Hand-Side Uncertainty (LHS-WJCC) refers to a class of stochastic and robust optimization problems where uncertainties appear multiplicatively or structurally in the left-hand side (LHS) coefficients of constraints, rather than in additive (right-hand side, RHS) terms. This concept is particularly critical in distributionally robust joint chance constrained (WJCC) optimization, robust control of physical systems, mathematical physics, uncertainty quantification, and statistical modeling. The treatment and tractability of LHS uncertainty fundamentally affect how systems are modeled, analyzed, and solved across a wide variety of domains.

1. Formal Definition and Paradigms

LHS uncertainty characterizes situations in which random parameters or uncertainties directly multiply the decision variables within constraints. In canonical form, a linear constraint with LHS uncertainty appears as: $$(b_p - A_p^\top x)^\top \xi + d_p - a_p^\top x \geq 0, \quad \forall p \in [P]$$ where $x$ is the decision vector and $\xi$ is a random vector (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025, Ho-Nguyen et al., 2020). The coefficients $A_p$ and $b_p$ encapsulate the random parameters affecting decisions. This differs fundamentally from RHS uncertainty, where randomness adds to the constant term but leaves coefficients deterministic.

LHS uncertainty appears in diverse science and engineering settings:

• Power systems dispatch: AGC (automatic generation control) participation factors are multiplied by uncertain aggregated wind errors (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025).
• Robust control: Plant parameters (e.g., gain, inertia) can be uncertain, entering the system’s LHS dynamics.
• Mathematical physics: The structure of left-definite Hilbert spaces is determined by left-side operators in difference or differential equations (AlAhmad, 2015).
• Stochastic optimization: Structural uncertainties in coefficients change the feasible region itself, presenting significant modeling and computational challenges.

2. Tractability and Problem-Specific Formulations

LHS uncertainty fundamentally alters the tractability and complexity of optimization and control formulations.

• Power systems (WJCC): The dispatch problem with LHS uncertainty in generation constraints is typically intractable by direct reformulation due to nonconvexity and coupling of randomness with decision variables. However, when the uncertainty/decision interaction is one-dimensional (e.g., a scalar decision variable times a scalar uncertain error), it is possible to derive closed-form quantile operators and strong valid inequalities (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025). This facilitates the construction of efficient inner convex approximations.
• Robust unit commitment: When uncertainties enter LHS via multiplicative adjustments to generator capacity based on ambient temperature or device efficiency, the resulting constraints become bilinear in random variables and decisions. Exact reformulations are nonconvex and typically intractable for large systems; binary relaxations and column-and-constraint generation approaches are required (Wang et al., 2022).
• Sturm–Liouville problems: When the RHS quadratic form is not positive definite (i.e., due to sign-changing or indefinite weight functions), a left-definite Hilbert space is constructed from the LHS operator to obtain stability in the spectral and variational theory (AlAhmad, 2015).
• Distributionally robust optimization: Under Wasserstein ambiguity sets, formulating DR-CCPs with LHS uncertainty poses stringent challenges in constructing tight big-M MIP reformulations. Valid inequalities and quantile-based tightening of big-M coefficients become essential for scalable optimization (Ho-Nguyen et al., 2020).

3. Solution Methodologies and Key Algorithms

Recent advances have yielded new algorithms and reformulations to address the LHS-WJCC problem structure.

FICA (Faster Inner Convex Approximation) (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025):

• Leverages a one-dimensional structure within LHS-WJCC, prevalent in certain power system constraints, to derive closed-form quantile functions for constraint satisfaction.
• Constructs inner approximations through ancillary (s, r) variables:
  • For constraints $p$ with 1D structure:

  $$\kappa_i ((b_p - A_p^\top x)^\top \xi_i + d_p - a_p^\top x) \geq s - r_i, \quad i \in [N]_p$$

• By reducing ancillary variable dimensions compared to conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) formulations, FICA achieves up to 500× faster computation for realistic power dispatch problems.

Quantile-based Strengthening (Distributionally Robust CCPs) (Ho-Nguyen et al., 2020):

• Introduces scenario-dependent quantile bounds for random LHS constraint functions, replacing loose big-M coefficients with scenario-specific, data-driven bounds, while preserving or strengthening feasibility.
• Efficient knapsack and mixing set inequalities are constructed for tractable MIP reformulations.

Adaptive Control and Reinforcement Learning in port-Hamiltonian Systems (Eslami et al., 8 Jun 2025):

• Splits system evolution into LHS (energy-preserving) Hamiltonian interconnection controlled via robust physics-based models, and RHS (dissipative/input) flow, managed via RL for adaptation to unmodeled dissipative uncertainties.
• The port variable $\Pi$ serves as the boundary interconnection, and the RL policy maps the desired port command from LHS to actual system input, with explicit guarantees on stability and robustness via small-gain arguments and Lyapunov analysis.

4. Practical Applications in Engineering and Physics

LHS uncertainty underpins the modeling and reliable operation of complex engineered and physical systems:

• Energy grid dispatch: Robust and DR joints chance constraints with LHS uncertainty ensure system safety when AGC factors are tuned in the presence of fluctuating renewable generation (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025).
• Unit commitment with physical uncertainties: Modeling generator output as a function of temperature and demand uncertainties improves both cost-effectiveness and operational security, provided efficient solution strategies using binary relaxations are employed (Wang et al., 2022).
• Sturm–Liouville spectral theory: Adapting the Hilbert space with a positive-definite quadratic form based on the LHS operator allows analysis of indefinite-weight systems (AlAhmad, 2015).
• Distributionally robust finance and supply chains: Joint chance constraints with LHS uncertainty account for risk when portfolio weights or contract allocations directly multiply uncertain future returns/demands (Ho-Nguyen et al., 2020).

5. Numerical Results and Performance Gains

Empirical studies demonstrate both the computational and operational value of advanced formulations for LHS uncertainty:

• Speedup and scalability: The FICA method achieves 40–500× speedup over CVaR-based approximations in power system instances, maintaining optimality gaps below 1% versus the exact MIP (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025).
• Robust feasibility and cost: Robust unit commitment with explicit LHS uncertainty modeling (e.g., through temperature effects) produces generator schedules that effectively hedge against real-world deviations—ensuring capacity during demand peaks and avoiding excessive costs during mild conditions (Wang et al., 2022).
• DR-CCP solution quality: Quantile-based tightening leads to substantial reductions in solution times and optimality gaps in stochastic portfolio and resource allocation problems, outperforming baseline big-M techniques especially for large sample sizes (Ho-Nguyen et al., 2020).

6. Theoretical and Future Directions

Research into LHS-WJCC motivates several open challenges:

• Generalization to multi-stage and nonconvex problems: Current tractable inner approximations often rely on one-dimensional structure or covering/packing properties. Extending to higher-dimensional or nonlinear LHS uncertainty remains challenging.
• Broader application domains: The methods developed for grid operations are applicable to logistics, finance, and resource allocation wherever proportional or multiplicative uncertainty arises between decisions and exogenous random variables (Zhou et al., 23 Jun 2025).
• Polyhedral studies and further valid inequalities: Theoretical exploration of the feasible sets’ polyhedral structure, especially for mixing set representations and branching rules for MIP, promises tighter relaxations and faster solution.
• Integration with machine learning/AI for robust control: Modular hybrid frameworks that assign LHS-structured uncertainties to model-based controllers, and residuals to RL, offer promising paths for interpretable, safe, and sample-efficient AI-driven control in nonlinear systems (Eslami et al., 8 Jun 2025).

7. Connections to Related Research

Although LHS uncertainty is frequently discussed in the context of optimization and control, the concept is echoed in other areas:

• Uncertainty quantification: Directional uncertainty components can be formalized in distance-based frameworks for learning, where “side-specific” uncertainties (LHS, RHS) are measured by minimal transport to directional Dirac distributions (Sale et al., 2023).
• Statistical physics and scattering theory: In the analysis of left-hand cuts in scattering amplitudes, “left-hand-side” nonanalyticities fundamentally impact the convergence of standard expansions (e.g., effective range expansion), necessitating new parameterizations that explicitly account for the LHS singularities (Du et al., 18 Aug 2024).
• Hilbert space methods in mathematical physics: The construction of left-definite inner products—positive definite only by virtue of the LHS operator—enables spectral theory for indefinite settings (AlAhmad, 2015).

---

In sum, left-hand-side uncertainty represents a unifying paradigm across stochastic optimization, robust control, mathematical physics, and uncertainty quantification. Sophisticated reformulations—from one-dimensional FICA and quantile-tightened MIPs to hybrid analytic/learning architectures—enable tractable, reliable, and interpretable solutions even for large-scale, complex, and high-risk real-world applications.