Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 100 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 58 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 480 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 215 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

First Drawdown Epoch in Lévy Processes

Updated 30 August 2025
  • First Drawdown Epoch is the first time the reflection of a Lévy process at its running supremum exceeds a set threshold, indicating a significant adverse event.
  • The derived sextuple law explicitly characterizes the joint distribution of the stopping time, supremum, infimum, and overshoot using scale functions and Lévy measures.
  • Applications extend to portfolio risk management and derivative pricing, where understanding drawdown events enables accurate modeling of path-dependent financial instruments.

The first drawdown epoch is a concept central to the fluctuation theory of completely asymmetric (spectrally one-sided) Lévy processes, with particular significance for risk management, option pricing, and path-dependent modeling. For a Lévy process XX, the drawdown process YY is defined as the reflection of XX at its running supremum Xˉ\bar{X}; that is, Yt=XˉtXtY_t = \bar{X}_t - X_t where Xˉt=sup0stXs\bar{X}_t = \sup_{0 \leq s \leq t} X_s. The first drawdown epoch, denoted τa\tau_a, is the first-passage time when the drawdown process YY exceeds a predetermined threshold a>0a > 0: τa=inf{t0:Yt>a}.\tau_a = \inf\{ t \ge 0 : Y_t > a \}. This epoch encapsulates not only the occurrence of a significant adverse event (relative to historical highs) but, when analyzed jointly with other path functionals, provides profound insight into both the fine structure and probabilistic behavior of the process at the moment of drawdown.

1. Formal Definition and Structure of the Drawdown Process

In a completely asymmetric (e.g., spectrally negative) Lévy process, the drawdown process YY serves as a path-functional tracking the loss from the historical maximum up to time tt. The precise definitions are: Xˉt=sup0stXs,Yt=XˉtXt,t0.\bar{X}_t = \sup_{0 \le s \le t} X_s, \qquad Y_t = \bar{X}_t - X_t, \qquad t \ge 0. Here, YtY_t quantifies "how far down" XtX_t is from its all-time high. This reflection structure is critical because the process Xˉt\bar{X}_t "remembers" the peak, inducing tractable properties leveraged in exit, overshoot/undershoot, and insurance computations.

The first drawdown epoch is the random time

τa=inf{t0:Yt>a}\tau_a = \inf\{t \ge 0 : Y_t > a\}

which, for a process XX without monotone paths and jumps in one direction, is almost surely finite. In risk and financial modeling, τa\tau_a is a key stopping time, marking events like position liquidations, option triggers (e.g., drawdown/Russian options), or sudden shifts in risk exposure.

2. Joint Law at the Drawdown Epoch: The Sextuple Law

The paper derives, via excursion-theoretic and compensation arguments, an explicit joint law for the sextuple of random variables observed at the first drawdown epoch: (τa,  Gˉτa,  Xˉτa,  Xτa,  aYτa,  Yτaa)(\tau_a,\; \bar{G}_{\tau_a},\; \bar{X}_{\tau_a},\; \underline{X}_{\tau_a},\; a - Y_{\tau_a^-},\; Y_{\tau_a} - a) where:

  • τa\tau_a: the first time YY exceeds aa,
  • Gˉτa\bar{G}_{\tau_a}: the last time prior to τa\tau_a when XX attained its supremum,
  • Xˉτa\bar{X}_{\tau_a}: the running supremum at τa\tau_a,
  • Xτa\underline{X}_{\tau_a}: the running infimum at τa\tau_a,
  • aYτaa - Y_{\tau_a^-}: the undershoot (distance just before exceeding aa),
  • YτaaY_{\tau_a} - a: the overshoot (by how much YY exceeds aa at τa\tau_a).

The law of this sextuple is expressed explicitly via the scale function W(q)W^{(q)}, its right-derivative W+(q)(a)W^{(q)\prime}_+(a), the Lévy measure Λ\Lambda, and the resolvent measure: λ(a,q)=W+(q)(a)W(q)(a),Ra(q)(dy)=[λ(a,q)1W(q)(dy)W(q)(y)dy].\lambda(a, q) = \frac{W^{(q)\prime}_+(a)}{W^{(q)}(a)}, \qquad R_a^{(q)}(dy) = [\lambda(a,q)^{-1} W^{(q)}(dy) - W^{(q)}(y)dy ]. In particular, the joint Laplace transform for events like a jump-induced crossing (overshoot nonzero) is: Ex[eqτarGˉτa;Ao]=W(q+r)((xu)a)W(q+r)(a)Fq+r,q,a(v(x(u+a)))Ra(q)(dy)  Λ(yadh),\mathbb{E}_x [e^{-q \tau_a - r \bar{G}_{\tau_a}}; A_o] = \frac{W^{(q+r)}((x-u) \wedge a)}{W^{(q+r)}(a)} \cdot F_{q+r, q, a}(v - (x \vee (u+a))) \cdot R_a^{(q)}(dy)\; \Lambda(y-a-dh), with Fp,q,a(y)=λ(a,q)exp(λ(a,p)y)F_{p,q,a}(y) = \lambda(a, q) \exp(-\lambda(a, p) y), and AoA_o specifying the appropriate region in path-space for a jump crossing. Alternative formulas are given for the creeping case (no overshoot).

This explicit, high-dimensional law enables not only the timing but also a detailed reconstruction of the process geometry at the drawdown—critical for applications requiring path-level information (option payoffs, risk attribution).

3. Scale Functions and Lévy Measure: Analytic Foundations

The scale function W(q)W^{(q)} is central to the representation of exit-related quantities in spectrally negative Lévy processes. For Laplace exponent ψ(θ)\psi(\theta), it is defined via

0eθxW(q)(x)dx=1ψ(θ)q,θ>Φ(q)\int_0^{\infty} e^{-\theta x} W^{(q)}(x) dx = \frac{1}{\psi(\theta) - q},\quad \theta > \Phi(q)

with right-inverse Φ(q)\Phi(q). The W(q)W^{(q)} is strictly increasing and continuous on [0,)[0, \infty), yielding explicit solutions to boundary crossing and first passage problems.

The Lévy measure Λ\Lambda determines the jump intensity and is essential to capturing the statistics of overshoots in jump crossings. Both W(q)W^{(q)} and Λ\Lambda are combined in the law for the full sextuple at τa\tau_a, as detailed above.

Relatedly, other functionals such as the resolvent Ra(q)R_a^{(q)} and Z(q)(x)=1+q0xW(q)(z)dzZ^{(q)}(x) = 1 + q \int_0^x W^{(q)}(z)dz appear in these path-dependent distributions, providing a complete toolkit for analytic evaluation.

4. Significance of τa\tau_a in Risk, Option Pricing, and Portfolio Management

The first drawdown epoch τa\tau_a demarcates the first time an underperformance relative to the running maximum exceeds aa. This is fundamentally important for several reasons:

  • Risk Management: τa\tau_a can trigger automatic trading responses, such as liquidation or position rebalancing upon reaching a prescribed loss from a peak.
  • Performance Measurement: Pathwise knowledge at τa\tau_a (i.e., the sextuple) provides insight into the severity and abruptness of losses, discriminating between jump and diffusive drawdown mechanisms.
  • Option Pricing: In path-dependent, drawdown-sensitive options (e.g., Russian or drawdown options), τa\tau_a is the relevant stopping time for payoff computation.
  • Portfolio Constraints: Investors or funds may include drawdown-based constraints, making the distribution of τa\tau_a and associated path functionals core to compliance and expected loss analysis.

The explicit formulas for the sextuple inform the probability that a drawdown occurs before a rally and are directly applicable in semi-analytic option pricing and risk quantification.

5. Application to Exponential Lévy Models and Practical Computation

In exponential Lévy models for asset prices, St=S0exp(Xt)S_t = S_0 \exp(X_t), the relative drawdown is simply: SˉtSt=exp(Yt)\frac{\bar{S}_t}{S_t} = \exp(Y_t) so a relative drawdown crossing level aa—or equivalently, a percentage drop α\alpha from the peak—has a=log(1α)a = -\log(1-\alpha). The first drawdown epoch is then

τa=inf{t0:Yt>a}.\tau_a = \inf\{ t \ge 0 : Y_t > a \}.

The sextuple law delivers, in closed form (by substitution of W(q)W^{(q)} and Λ\Lambda appropriate for the model), probabilities for drawdown preceding a rally, the distribution of losses at stopping, and expected payouts for various financial derivatives. For example, in Carr and Wu’s S&P 500 model with negative jumps, the scale function can often be written in terms of Mittag-Leffler functions, yielding almost fully analytic pricing of drawdown-contingent features.

6. Implementation, Extensions, and Impact

From an implementation perspective, the scale function must be computed (e.g., via Laplace inversion or explicit formula, if available) for the chosen Lévy model. Given W(q)W^{(q)} and Λ\Lambda, all terms in the sextuple law are directly evaluable. Models with stable or compound Poisson jumps are tractable, and the theory extends naturally to more complex spectrally one-sided processes.

These formulas underpin simulation schemes, closed-form evaluation for exotic options, and the modeling of risk measures directly linked to historical peaks and troughs.

7. Summary and Theoretical Integration

The theory in "On the drawdown of completely asymmetric Lévy processes" (Mijatovic et al., 2011) provides a unified and explicit analytic framework for:

  • describing the sample path structure of drawdowns at first passage,
  • computing joint distributions of stopping times and associated functionals,
  • rigorously linking fluctuation theory (scale function analysis) with practical risk, option pricing, and portfolio management applications in finance.

The approach connects deep probabilistic structure—excursion theory, compensation, and Lévy process fluctuation identities—with fully implementable formulas, ensuring both theoretical rigor and applied utility for high-frequency risk management and advanced financial engineering.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)