Distributional Encoding

• Distributional Encoding is a set of techniques that represent data via full empirical distributions rather than static point estimates.
• It powers applications in learned compression and Gaussian Process regression by adapting to input-specific statistics and reducing errors such as the amortization gap.
• Its flexible approach enhances kernel methods and dimensionality reduction while maintaining statistical fidelity and computational efficiency across diverse scenarios.

Distributional encoding (DE) refers to a collection of techniques and representations focused on capturing, transmitting, or leveraging the full distributional characteristics of data—be it in the form of input representations, compressed codes, model latent variables, or structures in supervised and unsupervised learning. DE has become a central concept spanning applications in information theory, learned compression, machine learning, kernel methods, and scientific modeling, offering principled solutions for both computational efficiency and statistical accuracy.

1. Foundational Principles of Distributional Encoding

Distributional encoding generalizes the idea that, instead of representing elements (such as samples, categories, or latent codes) by single points (e.g., mean values or static parameters), one encodes them via their empirical or estimated distributions. In compression and learning, this typically enables tighter matching between the actual data statistics and the models or coding systems responsible for processing, transmitting, or generating data.

A classic setting in learned compression demonstrates DE’s motivation: the widely used entropy bottleneck, as introduced by Ballé et al. (2018), compresses latent representations under a fixed, dataset-level probabilistic model. However, as observed by Ulhaq and Bajić (2406.13059), real world latents often diverge substantially from this fixed model on a per-input basis, creating a mismatch—the “amortization gap”—that penalizes achievable compression rates.

Similarly, in regression with categorical inputs, representing a qualitative category solely by its mean response value is inadequate; a distributional encoding captures all available information about the variability and empirical structure within each category (2506.04813).

2. Distributional Encoding in Learned Compression

The application of DE in neural image and data compression involves dynamically estimating and encoding the distribution of latent variables for each input instance, rather than relying on a single static, amortized prior.

• Dynamic Distribution Estimation: For each input $x$, the quantized latent code $\hat{y}$ is histogrammed (using a differentiable kernel density estimator) to yield an empirical probability mass function (pmf) per latent channel.
• Side-Information Transmission: The estimated pmf is itself compressed (typically via lightweight 1D convolutional transforms, much more efficient than traditional hyperpriors) and sent as side-information alongside the main latent data.
• Adaptive Decoding: The decoder reconstructs the pmf and uses it to decompress the latent code with minimal mismatch.

The rate achieved by using the empirically estimated distribution $p_j$ for encoding channel $j$ (instead of an amortized $\hat{p}_j$) is: $$R = \sum_{j=1}^{M} \sum_{i=1}^{B} -p_{ji} \log \hat{p}_{ji}$$ The approach reduces the Bj{\o}ntegaard-Delta (BD) rate by 7.10% compared to standard fully-factorized bottlenecks, with computational cost (MACs per pixel) an order of magnitude lower than comparable hyperprior methods (2406.13059).

Model (Transform)	Parameters (M)	MAC/pixel
DE (small)	0.029	10
Scale Hyperprior (small)	1.04	1,364
DE (large)	0.097	126
Scale Hyperprior (large)	2.40	3,285

This demonstrates how DE can act as a plug-in enhancement to learned compression, achieving rate savings and high efficiency.

3. Distributional Encoding in Gaussian Process Regression

In Gaussian Process (GP) regression with categorical (qualitative) inputs, DE represents each categorical variable by the empirical distribution of its associated outputs (responses), instead of a point summary such as the mean.

• Encoding Mechanism: For each input category (e.g., $u_t$ taking value $l$), associate the conditional empirical distribution $\hat{P}^Y_{t, l}$ observed in training.
• Kernel Construction: Define the GP kernel using a product over continuous ($k_\mathrm{cont}$) and distributional ($k_\mathcal{P}$) kernel components:

$$k(w^{(i)}, w^{(j)}) = \prod_{s=1}^{p} k_{\mathrm{cont}}(x^{(i)}_s, x^{(j)}_s)\prod_{t=1}^{q} k_{\mathcal{P}}(\hat{P}^Y_{t, u^{(i)}_t}, \hat{P}^Y_{t, u^{(j)}_t})$$

• Characteristic Kernels: $k_\mathcal{P}$ can be MMD-based or Wasserstein-based, e.g.,

$$k_{\mathrm{MMD}}(P, Q) = \exp\left(-\gamma \mathrm{MMD}^2(P, Q)\right), \quad k_{W_2}(P, Q) = \exp\left(-\gamma W_2^\beta(P, Q)\right)$$

This allows GPs to robustly handle both continuous and categorical variables, naturally leveraging auxiliary data and multi-task settings. Empirical studies find DE methods rival or surpass leading latent variable GP approaches in predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and data efficiency, particularly when sample sizes per category are small or auxiliary data are available (2506.04813).

4. Broader Applications and Extensions

Distributional encoding principles extend to numerous domains:

• Pattern Mining: DE underpins closed pattern mining for interval and distribution-valued data, representing uncertainty or group structure via atomic constraints on quantiles or cdfs, enabling robust and interpretable symbolic pattern discovery (2212.04849).
• Generative Modeling and Dimensionality Reduction: The Distributional Principal Autoencoder (DPA) ensures that reconstructed data are identically distributed to the original data by training the decoder to match the full conditional distribution given a latent embedding, extending autoencoder frameworks to guarantee distributional faithfulness across the latent space (2404.13649, 2502.11583). This supports applications in scientific data analysis (climate, genomics) and suggests new families of generative models.
• Kernel Methods for Categorical Data: By encoding qualitative inputs as empirical distributions and using characteristic kernels, one seamlessly integrates non-metric structures into kernel machines for regression, classification, and Bayesian optimization (2506.04813).

5. Advantages and Implementation Considerations

Distributional encoding offers several notable advantages:

• Statistical Fidelity: By matching actual (or empirical) distributions rather than point estimates, DE methods achieve tighter fits, reduced error (e.g., lower KL divergence for compression, improved regret in GPs), and preservation of higher-order or tail properties.
• Computational Efficiency: In compression, transmitting only a compact encoding of a per-input distribution can be an order of magnitude more efficient than full hyperprior architectures.
• Flexibility and Extensibility: DE can be applied in settings ranging from side-information transmission in neural compression to GP regression with discrete, continuous, or even multi-output data.

However, there are implementation considerations:

• The empirical estimation of distributions may require kernel smoothing or regularization, especially under small sample sizes.
• There is a trade-off between the fidelity of the transmitted distribution (side-information rate) and total bitrate or model complexity, necessitating careful tuning in practice.
• When selecting kernels (e.g., MMD, Wasserstein), computational cost, positive definiteness, and dimensionality should be accounted for.

6. Impact and Future Directions

Distributional encoding represents a bridge between information theory, modern machine learning, and statistical modeling, systematically incorporating uncertainty and population variability into core algorithms. Its adoption in learned compression is already yielding improved rate-distortion trade-offs and hardware efficiency. In kernel methods and regression with categorical data, DE enables the integration of complex, data-driven representations with plug-and-play replacements for legacy encodings.

Future research directions include more sophisticated distributional representations (e.g., parametric or learned generative codes), scalable DE mechanisms for high-dimensional or structured distributions, and cross-domain applications in scientific simulation, generative modeling, and uncertainty quantification. As empirical validation demonstrates, DE is both practically effective and theoretically grounded, supporting state-of-the-art results across its growing range of applications.

---

Domain	Distributional Encoding Mechanism	Main Advantage
Neural Compression	Per-input adaptive distribution, side-information coding	Reduces amortization gap, efficient
GP Regression	Empirical output distribution per categorical level	Expressive, data-efficient
Pattern Mining	Quantile/cdf constraints per distributional attribute	Robust, interpretable patterns
Dimensionality Reduction	Conditional distribution matching via DPA	Distributionally lossless, generative