Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 78 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Geometry of Constrained Optimization: Constrained Gradient Flows via Reparameterization: A-Stable Implicit Schemes, KKT from Stationarity, and Geometry-Respecting Algorithms (2508.18764v1)

Published 26 Aug 2025 in math.OC

Abstract: Gradient-flow (GF) viewpoints unify and illuminate optimization algorithms. Yet most GF analyses focus on unconstrained settings. We develop a geometry-respecting framework for constrained problems by (i) reparameterizing feasible sets with maps whose Jacobians vanish on the boundary (orthant/box) or are rank (n{-}1) (simplex), (ii) deriving flows in the parameter space which induce feasible primal dynamics, (iii) discretizing with A-stable implicit schemes solvable by robust inner loops (Modified Gauss-Newton or a KL-prox (negative-entropy) inner solver), and (iv) proving that stationarity of the dynamics implies KKT-with complementary slackness arising from a simple kinematic mechanism (''null speed'' or ''constant dual speed with vanishing Jacobian''). We also give a Stiefel-manifold treatment where Riemannian stationarity coincides with KKT. These results yield efficient, geometry-respecting algorithms for each constraint class. We include a brief A-stability discussion and present numerical tests (NNLS, simplex- and box-constrained least squares, orthogonality) demonstrating stability, accuracy, and runtime efficiency of the implicit schemes.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)