Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Network-Aware Scheduling for Remote Gate Execution in Quantum Data Centers (2504.20176v1)

Published 28 Apr 2025 in quant-ph, cs.DC, cs.NI, and cs.PF

Abstract: Modular quantum computing provides a scalable approach to overcome the limitations of monolithic quantum architectures by interconnecting multiple Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) through a quantum network. In this work, we explore and evaluate two entanglement scheduling strategies-static and dynamic-and analyze their performance in terms of circuit execution delay and network resource utilization under realistic assumptions and practical limitations such as probabilistic entanglement generation, limited communication qubits, photonic switch reconfiguration delays, and topology-induced contention. We show that dynamic scheduling consistently outperforms static scheduling in scenarios with high entanglement parallelism, especially when network resources are scarce. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of communication qubit coherence time, modeled as a cutoff for holding EPR pairs, and demonstrate that aggressive lookahead strategies can degrade performance when coherence times are short, due to premature entanglement discarding and wasted resources. We also identify congestion-free BSM provisioning by profiling peak BSM usage per switch. Our results provide actionable insights for scheduler design and resource provisioning in realistic quantum data centers, bringing system-level considerations closer to practical quantum computing deployment.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

Evaluating Scheduling Strategies in Quantum Data Centers for Distributed Quantum Computing

This paper presents an investigation into the scheduling strategies within quantum data centers (QDCs) for distributed quantum computing (DQC), focusing on the effective allocation of resources for entanglement generation. The research examines both static and dynamic scheduling methodologies while considering realistic network constraints such as probabilistic entanglement generation, limited communication qubits, and the operational limits of Bell-state measurement (BSM) modules.

Overview of Quantum Data Center Architecture

The authors unveil a comprehensive framework by employing modular quantum computing that interconnects multiple Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) through a Clos topology—an architecture designed to optimize resource distribution and minimize execution delays. This modular infrastructure is crucial for addressing the intrinsic scaling challenges of quantum processors, enabling the execution of non-local gates which necessitate entanglement between distant qubits.

Key Contributions

Essentially, this work proposes and rigorously evaluates two distinct entanglement scheduling strategies: static scheduling (with expected latency and probabilistic simulation) and dynamic scheduling. The static approach assumes deterministic entanglement generation time, aligning with previous studies, whereas the dynamic scheduler is adaptive to entanglement generation success and exploits gate dependency hierarchies to initiate processes opportunistically. This adaptability leads to significant reductions in execution delays by allowing immediate progression upon completion of parent gates.

Evaluation and Results

Through a series of simulations using benchmark quantum circuits—Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), Quantum Volume (QV), and QAOA—the authors meticulously investigate the performance implications of these scheduling strategies under varied cross-rack entanglement success probabilities. The dynamic scheduler consistently outperforms in contexts with intricate gate parallelism, particularly within circuits characterized by high interconnectivity, such as QAOA.

Furthermore, the paper explores the impacts of communication qubit coherence times, examining a lookahead strategy that actively generates entanglement for forthcoming DAG layers. This proactive approach holds potential for reduced execution delays, though constrained coherence windows necessitate cautious calibration to avoid resource wastage through EPR pair decoherence.

Practical Implications

The insights gleaned from this research have profound implications for the design of QDC orchestration systems, guiding the optimization of resource provisioning. Importantly, this work contributes to understanding the intricate balance of gate scheduling, network resource limitations, and communication protocols within emerging quantum frameworks.

Future Directions

Looking forward, the findings encourage further exploration into more sophisticated, network-aware partitioning algorithms that could enhance the ratio of intra-rack entanglement processes—historically less resource-intensive than cross-rack operations. Additionally, implementing reactive protocols in anticipation of entanglement decoherence presents an avenue for maintaining high resource utilization, bolstering system performance despite the temporal constraints of quantum memory.

In summary, this paper provides essential insights into resource allocation strategies critical for efficient quantum data center operations and underscores the importance of dynamically adaptable systems in future advancements in distributed quantum computing.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube