Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 58 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Exploring How LLMs Capture and Represent Domain-Specific Knowledge (2504.16871v2)

Published 23 Apr 2025 in cs.LG

Abstract: We study whether LLMs inherently capture domain-specific nuances in natural language. Our experiments probe the domain sensitivity of LLMs by examining their ability to distinguish queries from different domains using hidden states generated during the prefill phase. We reveal latent domain-related trajectories that indicate the model's internal recognition of query domains. We also study the robustness of these domain representations to variations in prompt styles and sources. Our approach leverages these representations for model selection, mapping the LLM that best matches the domain trace of the input query (i.e., the model with the highest performance on similar traces). Our findings show that LLMs can differentiate queries for related domains, and that the fine-tuned model is not always the most accurate. Unlike previous work, our interpretations apply to both closed and open-ended generative tasks

Summary

Exploring How LLMs Capture and Represent Domain-Specific Knowledge

The paper "Exploring How LLMs Capture and Represent Domain-Specific Knowledge" dives into the intricacies of identifying how LLMs process and internalize domain-specific information. The central hypothesis presented is that LLMs can encode distinctive representations of domain-specific information within their hidden states during the prefill phase, offering unique insights into their contextual understanding of queries from different domains.

Key Contributions

The authors investigate this hypothesis through empirical studies involving various LLM architectures. They utilize a mix of generative models including Gemma-2B, Phi-3-mini-3.8B, Llama2-7B, and Mistral-7B, alongside an encoder model, DeBERTa. Analyzing the hidden state activations across layers, they explore if these activations form latent domain-related trajectories, a concept indicating the model's ability to separate and represent domain-specific information internally.

Latent Domain Representations: The research evidences that the hidden states of LLMs consistently capture domain-specific signals, which are robust to variations in prompt styles and query sources. Specifically, the trajectories identified suggest that models inherently differentiate domains beyond surface-level textual features.

Robustness Across Tasks and Models: The paper reveals that these latent representations are stable across different architectures and remain post fine-tuning, pointing to the pre-trained model's powerful capacity to generalize from learned domain nuances rather than simply encoding factual recall.

Model Selection Enhancement: By employing an LLM Hidden States Classifier, the paper showcases an improvement in model selection for domain-specific tasks. It outperforms traditional semantic and token-based classification approaches, achieving a notable 12.3% accuracy improvement compared to domain fine-tuned models. This highlights the utility of leveraging internal representations over explicit domain fine-tuning for tasks requiring cross-domain generalization, such as in legal, medical, and mathematical reasoning contexts.

Experimental Design and Findings

The authors approach their investigation methodically, conducting experiments across datasets capturing a variety of domain-specific queries. By using the MMLU dataset and additional specialized domains like GSM8K and MEDMCQA, they ensure a robust evaluation environment. One finding of particular interest is the ability of LLMs to maintain domain-related distinctions even when trained on a mixture of domain-related prompts, emphasizing the stability of these hidden state representations.

Furthermore, the results indicated that reducing layer computations sacrifices performance, particularly in open-ended tasks such as GSM8K. This affirms the importance of deeper layers in preserving the nuanced comprehension of complex queries.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are significant. On a practical level, the insights into domain-specific knowledge representation enhance the model selection strategy, allowing for more efficient and contextually aware model deployment. It emphasizes a shift from reliance on explicit fine-tuning towards exploiting the generalization capacities inherent within the LLM's hidden states.

Theoretically, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of how LLMs encode and differentiate complex domain-specific information. This understanding is crucial for advancing transparency and interpretability in AI systems, and could serve as a foundation for future research exploring similar mechanisms in larger models or alternative architectures.

Moving forward, further exploration into the applicability of these findings within larger, more diverse LLMs, and across a broader spectrum of domains, could prove invaluable. Additionally, integrating this approach with emerging techniques in model interpretability could help bridge the gap between model reasoning and human understanding, promoting safer and more reliable AI systems.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com