Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 187 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Asymmetric Long-Step Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods with Dual Centering (2503.10155v1)

Published 13 Mar 2025 in math.OC

Abstract: In this paper, we develop a new asymmetric framework for solving primal-dual problems of Conic Optimization by Interior-Point Methods (IPMs). It allows development of efficient methods for problems, where the dual formulation is simpler than the primal one. The problems of this type arise, in particular, in Semidefinite Optimization (SDO), for which we propose a new method with very attractive computational cost. Our long-step predictor-corrector scheme is based on centering in the dual space. It computes the affine-scaling predicting direction by the use of the dual barrier function, controlling the tangent step size by a functional proximity measure. We show that for symmetric cones, the search procedure at the predictor step is very cheap. In general, we do not need sophisticated Linear Algebra, restricting ourselves only by Cholesky factorization. However, our complexity bounds correspond to the best known polynomial-time results. Moreover, for symmetric cones the bounds automatically depend on the minimal barrier parameter between the primal or the dual feasible sets. We show by SDO-examples that the corresponding gain can be very big. We argue that the dual framework is more suitable for adjustment to the actual complexity of the problem. As an example, we discuss some classes of SDO-problems, where the number of iterations is proportional to the square root of the number of linear equality constraints. Moreover, the computational cost of one iteration there is similar to that one for Linear Optimization. We support our theoretical developments by preliminary but encouraging numerical results with randomly generated SDO-problems of different size.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube