Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Language (2412.08686v1)

Published 11 Dec 2024 in cs.CL, cs.CY, and cs.LG

Abstract: Interpretability methods seek to understand LLM representations, yet the outputs of most such methods -- circuits, vectors, scalars -- are not immediately human-interpretable. In response, we introduce LatentQA, the task of answering open-ended questions about model activations in natural language. Towards solving LatentQA, we propose Latent Interpretation Tuning (LIT), which finetunes a decoder LLM on a dataset of activations and associated question-answer pairs, similar to how visual instruction tuning trains on question-answer pairs associated with images. We use the decoder for diverse reading applications, such as extracting relational knowledge from representations or uncovering system prompts governing model behavior. Our decoder also specifies a differentiable loss that we use to control models, such as debiasing models on stereotyped sentences and controlling the sentiment of generations. Finally, we extend LatentQA to reveal harmful model capabilities, such as generating recipes for bioweapons and code for hacking.

Summary

  • The paper introduces LatentQA, a novel method that translates LLM activations into human-readable language, outperforming conventional scalar or circuit techniques.
  • It employs Latent Interpretation Tuning by fine-tuning a decoder on activation-question pairs, thereby improving prediction accuracy and model guidance.
  • Empirical results show significant gains in debiasing and safety controls, underscoring its potential for advancing AI transparency and interpretability.

Insights on LatentQA: Decoding Model Activations

The paper "LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Language" introduces an innovative approach to enhancing the interpretability of LLMs through a task called LatentQA. This task involves answering open-ended questions about model activations in natural language, which could facilitate a deeper understanding of the latent space of LLMs. The authors propose a novel framework, Latent Interpretation Tuning (Lit), to address this task by fine-tuning a decoder LLM on a dataset of activations paired with corresponding question-answer pairs. This approach draws inspiration from methods used in visual instruction tuning, with an emphasis on leveraging natural language to explore the representations stored within LLMs.

Framework and Methodology

LatentQA is positioned as a solution to the challenges posed by traditional interpretability methods, which often map the latent space to less intuitive forms such as scalars or circuits. By utilizing Latent Interpretation Tuning, the authors fine-tune a decoder LLM to predict the properties of future model completions based on current activations. This is achieved by training the decoder on a curated dataset that pairs model activations with natural language labels, enabling the model to respond to questions about latent activations in a human-interpretable way.

The Lit framework operates by capturing activations from prompts input to the target LLM, which are then input to the decoder. Through this setup, the decoder learns to read relevant information about the model's internal representations and tendencies. The authors evaluate their approach in two principal ways: reading latent activations to extract information and using the decoder to control LLM behavior.

Results and Implications

The empirical evaluation of the decoder demonstrates its efficacy in both extracting relational knowledge and uncovering hidden system prompts. In experiments involving relational tasks, the Lit method outperforms conventional techniques such as linear probing and prior LatentQA systems, showing significant improvements in accuracy. This suggests that the decoder LLM can harness its language understanding abilities to generalize beyond the specific dataset it was trained on.

In terms of practical control over LLM behavior, the paper highlights the capability of the decoder to steer models towards desired objectives, such as reducing bias or controlling sentiment in generated content. Notably, the decoder is able to debias models significantly more effectively than traditional methods like prompting or linear representation edits. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate the potential of Lit to elicit harmful capabilities in a controlled manner, signaling an avenue for robustly auditing LLMs' safety.

The ability to read and manipulate the internal states of LLMs through natural language questions opens new doors for both interpretability research and practical applications. On a theoretical level, LatentQA expands our understanding of how LLMs represent knowledge internally, potentially informing the design of more transparent models. Practically, this approach could enhance the controllability and reliability of LLMs in real-world deployments.

Future Directions

Looking forward, the paper hints at the potential of scaling both the model size and dataset size in future iterations of Latent Interpretation Tuning. As larger models and richer datasets become available, LatentQA systems could become more robust and versatile. Additionally, incorporating diverse types of data and exploring different units of analysis in LLM architectures could further enhance interpretability capabilities.

In conclusion, "LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Language" provides a significant contribution to the field of interpretability, proposing a novel methodology that leverages natural language for interpreting and controlling latent representations in LLMs. The demonstrated successes of Lit in both interpretability tasks and behavior control showcase its promise as a tool for researchers and practitioners aiming to enhance the transparency and safety of AI systems. As the field advances, LatentQA may play a crucial role in the development of more interpretable and controllable AI models.