Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Training and Evaluating Language Models with Template-based Data Generation (2411.18104v3)

Published 27 Nov 2024 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: The rapid advancement of LLMs such as GPT-3, PaLM, and Llama has significantly transformed natural language processing, showcasing remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating language. However, these models often struggle with tasks requiring complex reasoning, particularly in mathematical problem-solving, due in part to the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality, domain-specific datasets necessary for training sophisticated reasoning abilities. To address this limitation, we introduce Template-based Data Generation (TDG), a novel approach that leverages LLMs (GPT-4) to automatically generate parameterized meta-templates, which are then used to synthesize a vast array of high-quality problems and solutions. Leveraging TDG, we create TemplateMath Part I: TemplateGSM, a dataset comprising over 7 million synthetically generated grade school math problems--each accompanied by code-based and natural language solutions--with the potential to generate an effectively unlimited number more. This dataset alleviates the scarcity of large-scale mathematical datasets and serves as a valuable resource for pre-training, fine-tuning, and evaluating LLMs in mathematical reasoning. Our method not only enables the generation of virtually infinite data but also elevates data augmentation to a new level by using GPT-4 for meta-template generation, ensuring diverse and high-quality problem structures. The TemplateMath Part I: TemplateGSM dataset is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/math-ai/TemplateGSM. The code is available at https://github.com/iiis-ai/TemplateMath.

Summary

  • The paper presents the Template-based Data Generation framework that leverages GPT-4 to create parameterized meta-templates for scalable math problem synthesis.
  • It integrates simultaneous problem and answer verification with reject sampling to ensure data quality and correctness.
  • The approach yields over 7 million diverse synthetic grade school math problems, enhancing LLM training for improved reasoning capabilities.

An Expert Overview of Template-based Data Generation for LLMs

The paper, "Training and Evaluating LLMs with Template-based Data Generation," addresses a critical bottleneck in the development of LLMs: the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality domain-specific datasets essential for tasks involving sophisticated reasoning, particularly in mathematical problem-solving. The authors introduce Template-based Data Generation (TDG), a methodological framework that leverages advanced LLMs, specifically GPT-4, to automatically generate parameterized meta-templates. These templates are instrumental in synthesizing vast repositories of high-caliber problems and their corresponding solutions.

Key Contributions and Methodology

This work builds on the capability of LLMs such as GPT-3, PaLM, and Llama in natural language processing tasks, yet acknowledges their limitations in rigorous logical reasoning tasks associated with mathematics. The TDG framework surpasses traditional data augmentation techniques by enabling the generation of data with virtually unlimited variety and quality, achieved through GPT-4's generation of meta-templates. These meta-templates encapsulate a diverse set of problem structures, allowing for scalability and enhanced data quality.

The authors detail the TDG process, highlighting key phases:

  • Generation of Meta-Templates: GPT-4 is employed to create comprehensive templates that map to a wide spectrum of mathematical problem types. These templates include variable components allowing for parameter variability.
  • Simultaneous QA Generation and Verification: The method integrates problem generation with solution verification, utilizing code-based and natural language formats to ensure the consistency and correctness of generated problem-solution pairs. A reject-sampling-based verification ensures only valid pairs contribute to the dataset.

Research Outcomes

The TDG framework culminates in the TemplateMath Part I: TemplateGSM dataset, which encompasses over 7 million synthetic grade school math problems, each supplementing code-executed and language-based solutions. The dataset, accessible via Hugging Face, promises to bridge the gap in mathematical reasoning resources, providing a robust foundation for pre-training and fine-tuning LLMs. Notably, the dataset's size and diversity—underpinned by 7,473 distinct meta-templates—highlight its potential in training models with improved reasoning and generalization capabilities.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of TemplateGSM are profound both practically and theoretically. Practically, it offers a high-quality, scalable dataset crucial for developing LLMs that require extensive training on mathematical reasoning tasks. Theoretically, by introducing diverse problem structures, TDG exemplifies a significant step toward generating datasets that simulate real-world complexity and variability.

Looking ahead, several areas could further develop this research:

  • Expansion to Higher-Level Mathematics: Current templates focus on grade school mathematics. Extending the framework to cover advanced mathematical domains could be challenging yet rewarding.
  • Mitigating Template Bias: The authors note potential template bias, where models might overly fit the generated template patterns. Future work could explore mechanisms to diversify and reduce template influence.
  • Multilingual Dataset Generation: Extending TDG for multilingual context could enhance the training of globally applicable LLMs.
  • Human Evaluation and Educational Value Assessment: Incorporating human feedback for the generated problems could refine the quality and ensure educational value aligns with learning objectives.

In conclusion, this work lays foundational groundwork for the synthesis of high-quality datasets through TDG, presenting a compelling solution to current data limitations within mathematical reasoning contexts. However, it also opens avenues for further inquiry, testing the limits of synthetic problem generation in advancing the capabilities of LLMs in reasoning and beyond.