Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Project Sid: Many-agent simulations toward AI civilization (2411.00114v1)

Published 31 Oct 2024 in cs.AI and cs.MA

Abstract: AI agents have been evaluated in isolation or within small groups, where interactions remain limited in scope and complexity. Large-scale simulations involving many autonomous agents -- reflecting the full spectrum of civilizational processes -- have yet to be explored. Here, we demonstrate how 10 - 1000+ AI agents behave and progress within agent societies. We first introduce the PIANO (Parallel Information Aggregation via Neural Orchestration) architecture, which enables agents to interact with humans and other agents in real-time while maintaining coherence across multiple output streams. We then evaluate agent performance in agent simulations using civilizational benchmarks inspired by human history. These simulations, set within a Minecraft environment, reveal that agents are capable of meaningful progress -- autonomously developing specialized roles, adhering to and changing collective rules, and engaging in cultural and religious transmission. These preliminary results show that agents can achieve significant milestones towards AI civilizations, opening new avenues for large simulations, agentic organizational intelligence, and integrating AI into human civilizations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. Evaluating multi-agent coordination abilities in large language models, 2023.
  2. Video pretraining (vpt): Learning to act by watching unlabeled online videos. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24639–24654, 2022.
  3. Chateval: Towards better llm-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07201, 2023.
  4. S-agents: self-organizing agents in open-ended environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04578, 2024.
  5. Cognition AI. Devin: The first ai software engineer. https://www.cognition-labs.com/blog, 2024. AI software development system. Accessed: 2024-10-28.
  6. What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Robotics, AI, and Humanity: Science, Ethics, and Policy, pages 43–56, 2021.
  7. Villageragent: A graph-based multi-agent framework for coordinating complex task dependencies in minecraft. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05720, 2024.
  8. Factory AI. Factory ai. https://www.factory.ai/, 2024. Corporate website. Accessed: 2024-10-28.
  9. Minedojo: Building open-ended embodied agents with internet-scale knowledge. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18343–18362, 2022.
  10. s3superscript𝑠3s^{3}italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT: Social-network simulation system with large language model-empowered agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14984, 2023.
  11. Michael S Gazzaniga. Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(8):653–659, 2005.
  12. Sciagents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05556, 2024.
  13. Mindagent: Emergent gaming interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09971, 2023.
  14. The variational bandwidth bottleneck: Stochastic evaluation on an information budget. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.11935, 2020.
  15. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01680, 2024.
  16. Minerl: A large-scale dataset of minecraft demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13440, 2019.
  17. Mastering diverse domains through world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104, 2023.
  18. A survey on large language model-based game agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02039, 2024.
  19. War and peace (waragent): Large language model-based multi-agent simulation of world wars. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17227, 2023.
  20. Understanding the planning of llm agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02716, 2024.
  21. Self-organized agents: A llm multi-agent framework toward ultra large-scale code generation and optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02183, 2024.
  22. SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  23. Lyfe agents: Generative agents for low-cost real-time social interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02172, 2023.
  24. Dspy: Compiling declarative language model calls into self-improving pipelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03714, 2023.
  25. The socialai school: Insights from developmental psychology towards artificial socio-cultural agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07871, 2023.
  26. LangChainAI. Langchain. https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain, 2023. An open-source framework for building applications using large language models.
  27. Camel: Communicative agents for “mind” exploration of large language model society. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:51991–52008, 2023.
  28. Theory of mind for multi-agent collaboration via large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10701, 2023.
  29. Econagent: large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 15523–15536, 2024.
  30. Avalonbench: Evaluating llms playing the game of avalon. In NeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop, 2023.
  31. MadcowD. ell. https://github.com/MadcowD/ell, 2024. GitHub repository.
  32. Alympics: Language agents meet game theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03220, 2023.
  33. Gaia: a benchmark for general ai assistants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12983, 2023.
  34. A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex. Nature neuroscience, 17(12):1661–1663, 2014.
  35. Do embodied agents dream of pixelated sheep: Embodied decision making using language guided world modelling. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 26311–26325. PMLR, 2023.
  36. OpenAI. Openai o1, 2024. Accessed: October 2024.
  37. Comma: A communicative multimodal multi-agent benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07553, 2024.
  38. Webcanvas: Benchmarking web agents in online environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12373, 2024.
  39. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior, 2023.
  40. Social simulacra: Creating populated prototypes for social computing systems. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 1–18, 2022.
  41. Cooperate or collapse: Emergence of sustainability behaviors in a society of llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16698, 2024.
  42. Agent q: Advanced reasoning and learning for autonomous ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07199, 2024.
  43. Chatdev: Communicative agents for software development. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 15174–15186, 2024.
  44. Learning internal representations by error propagation, parallel distributed processing, explorations in the microstructure of cognition, ed. de rumelhart and j. mcclelland. vol. 1. 1986. Biometrika, 71(599-607):6, 1986.
  45. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  46. Roger W Sperry. Split-brain approach to learning problems. The neu, 1967.
  47. Medagents: Large language models as collaborators for zero-shot medical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10537, 2023.
  48. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023.
  49. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2024.
  50. Battleagentbench: A benchmark for evaluating cooperation and competition capabilities of language models in multi-agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15971, 2024.
  51. Knowledge graph prompting for multi-document question answering. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 19206–19214, 2024.
  52. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022.
  53. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1):103–128, 1983.
  54. Simulating public administration crisis: A novel generative agent-based simulation system to lower technology barriers in social science research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06957, 2023.
  55. Large multimodal agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15116, 2024.
  56. Exploring large language models for communication games: An empirical study on werewolf. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04658, 2023.
  57. Auto-gpt for online decision making: Benchmarks and additional opinions, 2023.
  58. ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
  59. Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9556–9567, 2024.
  60. Building cooperative embodied agents modularly with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02485, 2023.
  61. Exploring collaboration mechanisms for llm agents: A social psychology view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02124, 2023.
  62. A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model based agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13501, 2024.
  63. Competeai: Understanding the competition dynamics of large language model-based agents. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024.
  64. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854, 2023.
  65. Language agents as optimizable graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16823, 2024.

Summary

  • The paper presents the PIANO architecture as a new cognitive framework enabling autonomous agent societies to form specialized roles.
  • The paper shows agents adapt and modify collective rules, mirroring democratic processes in human governance.
  • The paper demonstrates that agent-driven cultural evolution in a Minecraft setting offers tangible insights into long-term civilizational progression.

An Analytical Review of "Project Sid: Many-Agent Simulations toward AI Civilization"

The paper "Project Sid: Many-Agent Simulations toward AI Civilization" by Altera.AL details a comprehensive exploration into the possibilities of simulating large-scale autonomous agent societies. This work introduces a new cognitive architecture named PIANO (Parallel Information Aggregation via Neural Orchestration) and evaluates the agents' performance in a simulated Minecraft environment. It emphasizes the agents' ability to develop specialized roles, adhere to and modify collective rules, and facilitate cultural progression within these simulated civilizations.

PIANO Architecture

PIANO serves as the cognitive backbone of the agents, focused on improving their autonomy and real-time interactions. By utilizing concurrent modules and a bottlenecked decision-making controller, PIANO addresses common issues such as incoherence across output streams that typically impair multi-agent systems. This architecture mimics the orchestration and parallel execution seen in biological brains, enhancing real-time responsiveness without losing the ability to perform complex, multi-threaded tasks.

Evaluating Agent Performance

The paper proposes novel benchmarks to assess civilizational progress. The role of agents is evaluated based on their ability to autonomously adopt and transition between specialized roles within an artificial society, highlighting their capability of forming professional identities. Another benchmark involves the implementation and adaptation of collective rules akin to legal frameworks within human societies.

Key Findings and Contributions

  1. Specialization: Agents, guided by PIANO, spontaneously formed diverse societal roles such as farmers, engineers, and explorers. These roles emerged through interactions within the Minecraft environment. The capability of agents to engage in specialized activities aligned with societal goals reflects a significant step toward complex agent civilizations.
  2. Collective Rules: Through simulations involving taxation laws, agents demonstrated adherence to and the capability to democratically amend these rules based on community feedback, mirroring democratic processes observed in human societies.
  3. Cultural and Religious Transmission: The paper expands into analyzing the spread of cultural memes and religion within larger populations of 500 agents. The propagation of these cultural elements mirrors the diversity and dynamics of human cultural evolution, facilitating an understanding of how diverse beliefs and ideas can coexist and disseminate in large agent societies.
  4. Long-term Civilizational Progression: The evolution from small group interactions to complex societal behaviors implies a potential for AI agents to mimic the organizational intelligence found in human civilizations.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The advancements in modeling agent societies at such scales offer profound theoretical implications for understanding emergent societal behaviors and the construction of automated ecosystems. From a practical perspective, these simulations could prove invaluable in domains like urban planning, autonomous governance, and societal management, providing insights into systemic interactions and development dynamics.

Speculations on Future Developments

As AI continues to progress, the integration of such sophisticated agent-based systems into human societies could offer new dimensions to digital ecosystems, potentially redefining human-machine interactions and the role of AI in our socio-economic structures. The challenges lie in overcoming the constraints related to vision, spatial reasoning, and the innate drives necessary for holistic societal advancement.

Conclusion

The paper "Project Sid" lays foundational work in the simulation of AI civilizations through many-agent systems. It provides a robust framework and set of benchmarks, demonstrating meaningful agent organization, specialization, and progression. Despite certain limitations related to spatial capabilities and inherent motivations, the findings set a precedent for the exploration of large-scale, organized AI societies that could one day coalesce with human civilization. The insights garnered from such simulations could pave the way for new advancements in artificial general intelligence and our understanding of societal evolution.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube