Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 42 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Novel Development of LLM Driven mCODE Data Model for Improved Clinical Trial Matching to Enable Standardization and Interoperability in Oncology Research (2410.19826v1)

Published 18 Oct 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Each year, the lack of efficient data standardization and interoperability in cancer care contributes to the severe lack of timely and effective diagnosis, while constantly adding to the burden of cost, with cancer costs nationally reaching over $208 billion in 2023 alone. Traditional methods regarding clinical trial enroLLMent and clinical care in oncology are often manual, time-consuming, and lack a data-driven approach. This paper presents a novel framework to streamline standardization, interoperability, and exchange of cancer domains and enhance the integration of oncology-based EHRs across disparate healthcare systems. This paper utilizes advanced LLMs and Computer Engineering to streamline cancer clinical trials and discovery. By utilizing FHIR's resource-based approach and LLM-generated mCODE profiles, we ensure timely, accurate, and efficient sharing of patient information across disparate healthcare systems. Our methodology involves transforming unstructured patient treatment data, PDFs, free-text information, and progress notes into enriched mCODE profiles, facilitating seamless integration with our novel AI and ML-based clinical trial matching engine. The results of this study show a significant improvement in data standardization, with accuracy rates of our trained LLM peaking at over 92% with datasets consisting of thousands of patient data. Additionally, our LLM demonstrated an accuracy rate of 87% for SNOMED-CT, 90% for LOINC, and 84% for RxNorm codes. This trumps the current status quo, with LLMs such as GPT-4 and Claude's 3.5 peaking at an average of 77%. This paper successfully underscores the potential of our standardization and interoperability framework, paving the way for more efficient and personalized cancer treatment.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube