Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Unified Causality Analysis Based on the Degrees of Freedom (2410.19469v1)

Published 25 Oct 2024 in stat.ME, cs.AI, cs.LG, econ.EM, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: Temporally evolving systems are typically modeled by dynamic equations. A key challenge in accurate modeling is understanding the causal relationships between subsystems, as well as identifying the presence and influence of unobserved hidden drivers on the observed dynamics. This paper presents a unified method capable of identifying fundamental causal relationships between pairs of systems, whether deterministic or stochastic. Notably, the method also uncovers hidden common causes beyond the observed variables. By analyzing the degrees of freedom in the system, our approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of both causal influence and hidden confounders. This unified framework is validated through theoretical models and simulations, demonstrating its robustness and potential for broader application.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. Hans Reichenbach. The direction of time, volume 65. Univ of California Press, 1956.
  2. Granger causality: A review and recent advances. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9:289–319, 2022.
  3. Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for gaussian variables. Physical review letters, 103(23):238701, 2009.
  4. Spatial convergent cross mapping to detect causal relationships from short time series. Ecology, 96(5):1174–1181, 2015.
  5. Floris Takens. The reconstruction theorem for endomorphisms. Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, 33:231–262, 2002.
  6. Tim Sauer. Reconstruction of dynamical systems from interspike intervals. Physical Review Letters, 72(24):3811, 1994.
  7. Bayesian inference of causal relations between dynamical systems. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 185:115142, 2024.
  8. Complete inference of causal relations between dynamical systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.10806, 2018.
  9. Identifying hidden common causes from bivariate time series: A method using recurrence plots. Physical Review E, 81(1):016203, 2010.
  10. Causality, dynamical systems and the arrow of time. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(7), 2018.
  11. Causal structure learning from multivariate time series in settings with unmeasured confounding. In Proceedings of 2018 ACM SIGKDD workshop on causal discovery, pages 23–47. PMLR, 2018.
  12. Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets. Science advances, 5(11):eaau4996, 2019.
  13. Necessary and sufficient conditions for causal feature selection in time series with latent common causes. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7502–7511. PMLR, 2021.
  14. Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences. Nature Communications, 10(1):2553, June 2019.
  15. J. Runge. Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28(7):075310, July 2018.
  16. Causal inference for time series. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(4):487–505, 2023.
  17. Andreas Gerhardus. Characterization of causal ancestral graphs for time series with latent confounders, 2023.
  18. High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 12615–12625. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  19. LPCMCI: Causal discovery in time series with latent confounders, 2021.
  20. Bootstrap aggregation and confidence measures to improve time series causal discovery. In Causal Learning and Reasoning, pages 979–1007. PMLR, 2024.
  21. Causal discovery for time series from multiple datasets with latent contexts. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 766–776. PMLR, 2023.
  22. Judea Pearl. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009.
  23. An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs. Social science computer review, 9(1):62–72, 1991.
  24. Jiji Zhang. On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. Artificial Intelligence, 172(16-17):1873–1896, 2008.
  25. Jiji Zhang. Causal reasoning with ancestral graphs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(7), 2008.
  26. On learning causal structures from non-experimental data without any faithfulness assumption. In Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 554–582. PMLR, 2020.
  27. Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models. Frontiers in Genetics, 10:524, June 2019.
  28. A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(4):1–37, sep 2020.
  29. A Survey on Causal Inference. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 15(5):1–46, October 2021.
  30. Data-driven causal analysis of observational biological time series. eLife, 11:e72518, aug 2022.
  31. A review of causal discovery methods for molecular network analysis. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 10(10), October 2022.
  32. A Survey on Causal Discovery: Theory and Practice. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 151:101–129, December 2022.
  33. Causal inference for time series. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(7):487–505, 2023.
  34. Causal discovery from temporal data: An overview and new perspectives, 2023.
  35. A survey of methods, challenges and perspectives in causality, 2023.
  36. Deep time series models: A comprehensive survey and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13278, 2024.
  37. Causal deep learning: Encouraging impact on real-world problems through causality. Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, 18(3):200–309, 2024.
  38. Causality for earth science–a review on time-series and spatiotemporal causality methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05746, 2024.
  39. Frank Doehner. Causal representation learning: A quick survey. In Workshop of Fraunhofer IOSB and Institute for Anthropomatics, Vision and Fusion Laboratory, page 21, 2024.
  40. Bridging causal discovery and large language models: A comprehensive survey of integrative approaches and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11068, 2024.
  41. Causal inference meets deep learning: A comprehensive survey. Research, 2024.
  42. Exploring synergies between causal models and largelanguage models for enhanced understanding and inference. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd Asia Conference on Computer Vision, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, pages 1–8, 2024.
  43. Large language models and causal inference in collaboration: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09606, 2024.
  44. Causality and model abstraction. Artificial intelligence, 67(1):143–194, 1994.
  45. Relaxation of some confusions about confounders. Entropy, 23(11):1450, 2021.
  46. Causal discovery of stochastic dynamical systems: A markov chain approach. Mathematics, 11(4):852, 2023.
  47. Jaroslav Stark. Delay embeddings for forced systems. i. deterministic forcing. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 9:255–332, 1999.
  48. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. science, 338(6106):496–500, 2012.
  49. Topological causality in dynamical systems. Physical review letters, 119(9):098301, 2017.
  50. Anna Krakovská. Correlation dimension detects causal links in coupled dynamical systems. Entropy, 21(9):818, 2019.
  51. Chickens, eggs, and causality, or which came first. American journal of agricultural economics, 70(2):237–238, 1988.
  52. Which came first? eggs and chicken in brazil: A new study. REGEN Revista de Gestão, Economia e Negócios, 2(2):87–99, 2021.
  53. Clive WJ Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 424–438, 1969.
  54. Thomas Schreiber. Measuring information transfer. Physical review letters, 85(2):461, 2000.
  55. Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems. Nature communications, 6(1):8502, 2015.
  56. Gain-assisted superluminal light propagation. Nature, 406(6793):277–279, 2000.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to View