Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

CounterQuill: Investigating the Potential of Human-AI Collaboration in Online Counterspeech Writing (2410.03032v1)

Published 3 Oct 2024 in cs.HC, cs.AI, and cs.CY

Abstract: Online hate speech has become increasingly prevalent on social media platforms, causing harm to individuals and society. While efforts have been made to combat this issue through content moderation, the potential of user-driven counterspeech as an alternative solution remains underexplored. Existing counterspeech methods often face challenges such as fear of retaliation and skill-related barriers. To address these challenges, we introduce CounterQuill, an AI-mediated system that assists users in composing effective and empathetic counterspeech. CounterQuill provides a three-step process: (1) a learning session to help users understand hate speech and counterspeech; (2) a brainstorming session that guides users in identifying key elements of hate speech and exploring counterspeech strategies; and (3) a co-writing session that enables users to draft and refine their counterspeech with CounterQuill. We conducted a within-subjects user study with 20 participants to evaluate CounterQuill in comparison to ChatGPT. Results show that CounterQuill's guidance and collaborative writing process provided users a stronger sense of ownership over their co-authored counterspeech. Users perceived CounterQuill as a writing partner and thus were more willing to post the co-written counterspeech online compared to the one written with ChatGPT.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Xiaohan Ding (41 papers)
  2. Kaike Ping (4 papers)
  3. Uma Sushmitha Gunturi (4 papers)
  4. Buse Carik (6 papers)
  5. Sophia Stil (2 papers)
  6. Lance T Wilhelm (15 papers)
  7. Taufiq Daryanto (4 papers)
  8. James Hawdon (3 papers)
  9. Sang Won Lee (23 papers)
  10. Eugenia H Rho (2 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

An Examination of Human-AI Collaboration in Counterspeech Writing: Introducing CounterQuill

The research paper titled "CounterQuill: Investigating the Potential of Human-AI Collaboration in Online Counterspeech Writing" focuses on addressing the challenge of online hate speech through an innovative system termed CounterQuill. As social media continues to be a breeding ground for hate speech, this paper is positioned within a growing body of research exploring user-driven solutions that transcend traditional content moderation methods.

Problem Context and Proposed Solution

The paper identifies existing barriers to effective user-driven counterspeech, such as apprehensions about retaliation and challenges related to writing skills. It highlights the inadequacies in existing AI-generated counterspeech, which often lacks personalization and emotional resonance. In this context, the researchers introduce CounterQuill, an AI-mediated system designed to support users in drafting nuanced, empathetic counterspeech. CounterQuill is structured into three distinct sessions—learning, brainstorming, and co-writing—to equip users with both the knowledge and the tools necessary for effective counterspeech creation.

  1. Learning Session: This initial phase educates users about the nuances of hate speech and effective counterspeech strategies, particularly focusing on empathy-based approaches. This educational foundation aims to heighten awareness and understanding of both explicit and implicit hate speech dynamics.
  2. Brainstorming Session: By guiding users through a structured reflection process, this session aids in identifying the critical components of hate speech, such as targeted identities and dehumanizing language. With AI-driven feedback, users are encouraged to consider potential empathetic counter-responses.
  3. Co-Writing Session (CounterQuill): In this session, AI assistants provide real-time feedback and refinement suggestions, empowering users to tailor their counterspeech. Features such as selective rewriting and tone customization help align the output with personal user expression.

Methodology and Evaluation

The effectiveness of CounterQuill was empirically evaluated through a within-subjects user paper involving 20 participants. The design compared users' experiences and outputs when utilizing CounterQuill versus ChatGPT, a baseline generative AI tool. A multifaceted approach was employed to assess participants' perceptions, including NASA-TLX workload assessments and custom measures addressing users' confidence, satisfaction, and willingness to post counterspeech online.

The statistical analysis of the NASA-TLX ratings revealed that CounterQuill was associated with significantly higher performance scores compared to ChatGPT, albeit requiring greater physical and temporal demand—indicative of the enhanced effort integral to the AI-human collaborative process. Notably, users reported lower frustration levels with CounterQuill, highlighting its supportive framework in mitigating the challenges of counterspeech writing.

Key Findings and Implications

Findings from the paper suggest several dimensions in which CounterQuill enhances the counterspeech writing experience:

  • Enhanced Ownership and Engagement: Participants expressed a stronger sense of ownership over the counterspeech co-authored with CounterQuill, correlating with their level of cognitive effort and customization during the writing process. This sense of investment influenced a greater willingness to share their responses publicly on social media.
  • Adapted Learning and Empathy: Through guided learning and feedback mechanisms, participants demonstrated improved capabilities in identifying and articulating the impacts of hate speech. The integration of empathy-based approaches was effective in crafting responses that were not only assertive but also constructive.
  • User-Centric Customization: CounterQuill’s capacity to assist users in selectively refining and personalizing their counterspeech was recognized as a significant improvement over conventional AI writing assistants, which often fail to accommodate individual user perspectives and emotional tones.

Conclusion and Future Directions

This research underscores the potential of human-AI collaboration in enhancing user agency and effectiveness in counterspeech creation. The paper paves the way for further exploration into embedding such AI-mediated tools within social media platforms, allowing real-time assistance in the face of online hate speech. Future work may involve long-term field studies to validate CounterQuill's impact on user behavior and its role in fostering healthier online discourse.

CounterQuill exemplifies an incremental step towards equipping users with the necessary skills and confidence to engage constructively with online hate, setting a foundation for future developments in AI-mediated counterspeech strategies.