Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

CrowdCounter: A benchmark type-specific multi-target counterspeech dataset (2410.01400v1)

Published 2 Oct 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Counterspeech presents a viable alternative to banning or suspending users for hate speech while upholding freedom of expression. However, writing effective counterspeech is challenging for moderators/users. Hence, developing suggestion tools for writing counterspeech is the need of the hour. One critical challenge in developing such a tool is the lack of quality and diversity of the responses in the existing datasets. Hence, we introduce a new dataset - CrowdCounter containing 3,425 hate speech-counterspeech pairs spanning six different counterspeech types (empathy, humor, questioning, warning, shaming, contradiction), which is the first of its kind. The design of our annotation platform itself encourages annotators to write type-specific, non-redundant and high-quality counterspeech. We evaluate two frameworks for generating counterspeech responses - vanilla and type-controlled prompts - across four LLMs. In terms of metrics, we evaluate the responses using relevance, diversity and quality. We observe that Flan-T5 is the best model in the vanilla framework across different models. Type-specific prompts enhance the relevance of the responses, although they might reduce the language quality. DialoGPT proves to be the best at following the instructions and generating the type-specific counterspeech accurately.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Punyajoy Saha (27 papers)
  2. Abhilash Datta (3 papers)
  3. Abhik Jana (14 papers)
  4. Animesh Mukherjee (154 papers)

Summary

Analysis of "CrowdCounter: A Benchmark Type-Specific Multi-Target Counterspeech Dataset"

The paper "CrowdCounter: A Benchmark Type-Specific Multi-Target Counterspeech Dataset" introduces a novel dataset aimed at enhancing the generation and diversity of counterspeech, a strategic response to hate speech. The research is grounded in the challenges faced by moderators and users in crafting effective counterspeech while balancing freedom of expression. Below, I explore the key aspects presented in the paper and discuss the implications and future directions for AI in this domain.

Dataset Introduction

The core contribution of this paper is the CrowdCounter dataset, consisting of 3,425 pairs of hate speech and corresponding counterspeech spanning six distinct types: empathy, humor, questioning, warning, shaming, and contradiction. This dataset is noteworthy for its diverse range of responses and targets, overcoming limitations found in previous datasets, which lacked in quality and variety. The authors employed a crowd-sourced annotation approach characterized by specific instructions to ensure the production of high-quality, type-specific counterspeech.

Frameworks for Counterspeech Generation

The paper evaluates two frameworks—vanilla and type-specific prompts—across four LLMs: Flan-T5, DialoGPT, and two variants from the Llama series. Flan-T5 performs best in the vanilla framework based on metrics such as relevance, quality, and diversity. However, DialoGPT demonstrates the highest effectiveness in generating type-specific counterspeech, accurately aligning with given types.

Comprehensive Evaluation Metrics

The authors conducted a thorough evaluation using a combination of referential, diversity, and quality metrics. These assessments revealed that type-specific prompts improved the relevance of the generated responses while causing a slight decrease in language quality. Such findings highlight a trade-off that researchers may need to navigate as they strive for both pertinent and articulate counterspeech.

Comparative Dataset Analysis

CrowdCounter is also compared with other popular datasets like Gab and Reddit, emphasizing its superior diversity and readability. With an average of 2.58 counterspeech responses per hate speech, CrowdCounter stands apart in terms of nuanced engagement with abusive content, providing a richer training ground for AI models.

Implications for AI Development

This work draws attention to the importance of designing sophisticated datasets to address complex issues surrounding hate speech moderation. The dataset's emphasis on type-specific counterspeech opens up new avenues for the development of AI models capable of generating contextually relevant and societally sensitive responses. The nuanced understanding showcased in this dataset could facilitate model training to create more adaptive and human-like interactions in content moderation systems.

Future Directions

Future research stemming from this dataset could explore expanding the multilingual potential of counterspeech generation to enhance cross-cultural applicability. Additionally, more robust models can be developed focusing on maintaining language quality while achieving type-specific relevance, allowing for more balanced counterspeech generation.

Overall, "CrowdCounter: A Benchmark Type-Specific Multi-Target Counterspeech Dataset" lays the groundwork for future advancements in the field of counterspeech generation, encouraging the development of intelligent and nuanced AI systems equipped to handle the intricacies of online hate speech effectively.