Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Large Language Models as Markov Chains (2410.02724v2)

Published 3 Oct 2024 in stat.ML, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: LLMs are remarkably efficient across a wide range of natural language processing tasks and well beyond them. However, a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the LLMs' generalization capabilities remains elusive. In our paper, we approach this task by drawing an equivalence between autoregressive transformer-based LLMs and Markov chains defined on a finite state space. This allows us to study the multi-step inference mechanism of LLMs from first principles. We relate the obtained results to the pathological behavior observed with LLMs such as repetitions and incoherent replies with high temperature. Finally, we leverage the proposed formalization to derive pre-training and in-context learning generalization bounds for LLMs under realistic data and model assumptions. Experiments with the most recent Llama and Gemma herds of models show that our theory correctly captures their behavior in practice.

Citations (4)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper establishes an equivalence between autoregressive language models and Markov chains by mapping context window and vocabulary size to a defined state space.
  • It derives conditions for a unique stationary distribution and analyzes convergence rates influenced by temperature and model parameters.
  • The work presents generalization bounds for pre-training and in-context learning, validated through experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs.

Analysis of "LLMs as Markov Chains"

The paper "LLMs as Markov Chains" presents an intriguing approach to understanding the inference capabilities of LLMs by framing them as Markov chains. This work provides novel insights into the theoretical analysis of LLMs, which have demonstrated remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks.

Key Contributions

  1. Equivalence of LLMs and Markov Chains: The authors establish an equivalence between autoregressive LLMs with a context window of size KK and a vocabulary of size TT, and Markov chains defined on a state space of size O(TK)O(T^K). This formulation captures the probabilistic nature of LLMs and structures their potential input and output sequences comprehensively.
  2. Stationary Distribution and Convergence: The paper derives conditions for the existence of a unique stationary distribution for these Markov chains. The convergence rate to this distribution is analyzed, taking into account model parameters like vocabulary size, context window, and temperature.
  3. Generalization Bounds: The authors provide generalization bounds for pre-training and in-context learning (ICL). Using concentration inequalities, they offer bounds under minimal assumptions, ensuring broad applicability. These results reveal how LLMs generalize from temporal sequences, potentially exceeding frequentist methods in certain respects.
  4. Experimental Validation: Experiments conducted using several contemporary LLMs, including those developed from 2023 to 2024, confirm that these models follow the scaling laws predicted by their theoretical results. Notably, LLMs demonstrated superior capabilities in learning Markov chains compared to traditional methods, especially in handling large state spaces.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

  • Temperature and Exploration:

The paper highlights the role of temperature in the Markov chain analogy, affecting the convergence speed to the stationary distribution. This has practical relevance in adjusting LLMs behavior during inference by merely tuning the temperature.

  • Model and Training Complexity:

The bounds provided give a perspective on the sample complexity of LLMs, indicating dependence on vocabulary size and context window. This has implications for designing more efficient training regimes and understanding the architecture's impact on generalization.

  • Future Directions:

The Markov chain interpretation could lead to new methodologies for further refining LLM inference capabilities, potentially inspiring work in areas such as hierarchical modeling or adaptive temperature scaling.

Conclusion

The paper presents a compelling case for viewing LLMs through the lens of Markov chains. It sheds light on foundational aspects of LLM behavior that were previously less understood, providing tangible theoretical insights and experimental confirmations. As the field of AI progresses, such a perspective could be pivotal in advancing both the theoretical understanding and practical deployment of more efficient and capable LLMs.

HackerNews

  1. Large Language Models as Markov Chains (75 points, 54 comments)
  2. LLMs as Markov Chains (5 points, 0 comments)
  3. Large Language Models as Markov Chains (1 point, 0 comments)