Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 86 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 204 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Does the HCN/CO ratio trace the star-forming fraction of gas? II. Variations in CO and HCN Emissivity (2410.00243v2)

Published 30 Sep 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We model emissivities of the HCN and CO $J=1-0$ transitions using measured properties of clouds found in normal star forming galaxies and more extreme systems. These models are compared with observations of HCN and CO $J=1-0$ transitions. We combine these model emissivities with predictions of gravoturbulent models of star formation, explore the impact of excitation and optical depth on CO and HCN emission, and assess if observed HCN/CO ratios track the fraction of gravitationally-bound dense gas, $f_\mathrm{grav}$, in molecular clouds. Our modeled HCN/CO ratios and emissivities are consistent with measurements from observations. CO emission shows a range of optical depths across different environments, from optically thick in normal galaxies to moderately optically thin in extreme systems. HCN is only moderately optically thick, with significant subthermal excitation in both normal and extreme galaxies. We find an anticorrelation between HCN/CO and $f_\mathrm{grav}$ as predicted by gravoturbulent models of star formation. Instead this ratio tracks gas at moderate densities ($n>10{3.5}\ \mathrm{cm}{-3}$), which is below the standard dense gas threshold of $n>10{4.5}\ \mathrm{cm}{-3}$. Variations in CO emissivity depend strongly on optical depth, due to variations in the dynamics of the cloud gas. HCN emissivity depends more strongly on excitation, and thus does not directly track variations in CO emissivity. We conclude that a single line ratio, such as HCN/CO, will not consistently track the fraction of gravitationally-bound, star-forming gas if the critical density for star formation varies in molecular clouds. This work highlights important uncertainties that need to be considered when observationally applying an HCN conversion factor in order to estimate the dense (i.e. $n>10{4.5}\ \mathrm{cm}{-3}$) gas content in nearby galaxies.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube