Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Diffusion Guided Language Modeling (2408.04220v1)

Published 8 Aug 2024 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: Current LLMs demonstrate remarkable proficiency in text generation. However, for many applications it is desirable to control attributes, such as sentiment, or toxicity, of the generated language -- ideally tailored towards each specific use case and target audience. For auto-regressive LLMs, existing guidance methods are prone to decoding errors that cascade during generation and degrade performance. In contrast, text diffusion models can easily be guided with, for example, a simple linear sentiment classifier -- however they do suffer from significantly higher perplexity than auto-regressive alternatives. In this paper we use a guided diffusion model to produce a latent proposal that steers an auto-regressive LLM to generate text with desired properties. Our model inherits the unmatched fluency of the auto-regressive approach and the plug-and-play flexibility of diffusion. We show that it outperforms previous plug-and-play guidance methods across a wide range of benchmark data sets. Further, controlling a new attribute in our framework is reduced to training a single logistic regression classifier.

Diffusion Guided LLMing: A Review

The paper, authored by Justin Lovelace, Varsha Kishore, Yiwei Chen, and Kilian Q. Weinberger, titled "Diffusion Guided LLMing," introduces a hybrid approach that combines the fluency of autoregressive (AR) LLMs (LMs) with the flexibility of diffusion-based models. This method, termed Diffusion Guided LLMing (DGLM), aims to produce text that not only maintains the high quality typical of AR models but also allows for fine-grained attribute control through lightweight guidance mechanisms.

Overview

The work addresses a significant gap in current LM methodologies—the need for controllable text generation that adheres to specific attributes such as sentiment or toxicity. Traditional AR models, while proficient in generating coherent text, struggle with attribute control, especially without fine-tuning, which can degrade performance. In contrast, diffusion models offer a natural framework for plug-and-play control but suffer from higher perplexity.

DGLM merges these two paradigms by employing a diffusion model to generate latent semantic proposals that guide an AR model. The result is a system that leverages the strengths of both approaches: AR models' fluency and diffusion models' controllability.

Methodology

The methodology comprises three major components:

  1. Semantic Proposal Conditioning: The authors utilize Sentence-T5 for embedding continuations, which are then converted into soft prompts through a lightweight prompt generator. This generator is fine-tuned to ensure that the AR decoder generates text aligned with these embeddings.
  2. Semantic Diffusion: A diffusion model operates in the latent space of Sentence-T5, generating potential text continuations iteratively. This model, structured as a transformer, learns to condition on text prefixes to propose plausible continuations.
  3. Plug-and-Play Control: Using a Monte-Carlo approximation for gradient-based guidance, the model allows for effective plug-and-play control. This approach facilitates incorporating simple classifiers to guide text generation according to desired attributes.

Experimental Results

The empirical results are robust, demonstrating that DGLM achieves lower perplexity and higher diversity than existing plug-and-play methods across a variety of datasets. For instance:

  • On the C4 dataset, DGLM achieved a perplexity of 19.8 and a diversity score of 54.0 with a guidance weight of 3.0, outperforming GPT-2 and other baseline methods.
  • The method also demonstrated significant improvements in controlled generation tasks, such as reducing toxicity and modifying sentiment, without compromising fluency.

One standout feature is DGLM's ability to add new attributes by training a single logistic regression classifier, showcasing its scalability and efficiency.

Implications

Theoretical Implications

From a theoretical standpoint, DGLM underscores the potential of integrating discrete and continuous generation paradigms. By decoupling the training from attribute control, the approach simplifies the addition of new control dimensions. This also invites further research into more complex classifiers that could handle a broader spectrum of attributes.

Practical Implications

Practically, the approach offers significant benefits for applications requiring tailored text generation. For instance, customer service chatbots can maintain appropriate emotional tones, or content moderation systems can dynamically adjust language to mitigate toxicity. The ability to efficiently implement fine-grained control without extensive model retraining presents compelling cost and performance advantages.

Future Directions

The paper identifies several avenues for further exploration. These include:

  • Complex Attribute Control: Extending beyond simple classifiers to handle nuanced attributes.
  • Efficiency Improvements: Optimizing the diffusion process to further reduce the overhead associated with short text generation.
  • Robustness and Safety: Enhancing the model's capabilities to ensure reliable control under all possible operational scenarios.

Conclusion

DGLM represents a significant advancement in the field of controllable text generation. By hybridizing diffusion and AR models, the authors provide a framework that achieves a balance between fluency and flexibility. While challenges remain, particularly regarding computational efficiency and complex attribute handling, the foundational contributions of this work pave the way for the development of more adaptable and nuanced LLMs.

In summary, Diffusion Guided LLMing presents a compelling approach that effectively addresses current limitations in LM controllability, showcasing marked improvements in both empirical performance and practical applicability.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Justin Lovelace (7 papers)
  2. Varsha Kishore (8 papers)
  3. Yiwei Chen (19 papers)
  4. Kilian Q. Weinberger (105 papers)
Citations (3)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com