Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

StreamBench: Towards Benchmarking Continuous Improvement of Language Agents (2406.08747v2)

Published 13 Jun 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Recent works have shown that LLM agents are able to improve themselves from experience, which is an important ability for continuous enhancement post-deployment. However, existing benchmarks primarily evaluate their innate capabilities and do not assess their ability to improve over time. To address this gap, we introduce StreamBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to evaluate the continuous improvement of LLM agents over an input-feedback sequence. StreamBench simulates an online learning environment where LLMs receive a continuous flow of feedback stream and iteratively enhance their performance. In addition, we propose several simple yet effective baselines for improving LLMs on StreamBench, and provide a comprehensive analysis to identify critical components that contribute to successful streaming strategies. Our work serves as a stepping stone towards developing effective online learning strategies for LLMs, paving the way for more adaptive AI systems in streaming scenarios. Source code: https://github.com/stream-bench/stream-bench. Benchmark website: https://stream-bench.github.io.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Cheng-Kuang Wu (11 papers)
  2. Zhi Rui Tam (8 papers)
  3. Chieh-Yen Lin (7 papers)
  4. Yun-Nung Chen (104 papers)
  5. Hung-yi Lee (327 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

An Overview of "StreamBench: Towards Benchmarking Continuous Improvement of Language Agents"

The paper entitled "StreamBench: Towards Benchmarking Continuous Improvement of Language Agents" introduces an innovative framework designed to evaluate and enhance the continuous learning capabilities of LLM agents. Traditional benchmarks have largely focused on assessing LLMs based on static capabilities without considering their potential for improvement through accumulated experience and feedback over time. StreamBench bridges this gap by offering a benchmark that simulates an online learning environment where LLMs iteratively enhance their performance through a sequence of input and feedback.

Key Contributions and Methodology

The paper introduces StreamBench, which stands as a pioneering effort to evaluate LLM agents' continuous improvement capabilities in streaming scenarios. This benchmark specifically evaluates how well LLMs develop over a sequence of interactions, measuring their ability to enhance task performance based on feedback received. Importantly, the authors also present baselines for continuous improvement strategies, highlighting effective components that contribute to successful online learning.

The benchmark is rigorously formulated to involve a streaming scenario with a sequence of inputs, an agent, and an external environment providing feedback. The agent, enhanced with components such as external memory and retrievers, continuously updates its capabilities. The environment provides a feedback signal to facilitate learning, simulating an online learning setup. Importantly, the methodologies proposed are designed to manage significant computational costs that arise when updating model parameters in large foundation models.

Baselines and Experimental Setup

The authors evaluate several algorithms including GrowPrompt and MemPrompt, which utilize memory components to retain information from past interactions. The innovative Self-StreamICL approach stores only correct output examples, enhancing performance significantly over incorrect counterparts. The paper reveals that the use of correct self-generated output is crucial for effective streaming strategies.

Additionally, the Multi-Agentic-Memory StreamICL (MAM-StreamICL) is introduced as a cost-effective, multi-agent framework where multiple agents share a common memory. This setup demonstrates additional performance gains over individual agents, underscoring the potential of collaborative memory sharing among LLMs. The paper found that this approach notably outperforms individual memory approaches, while maintaining a similar average cost to that of a single agent.

Findings and Implications

The results from testing across tasks, including text-to-SQL, Python programming, tool use, medical diagnosis, and question answering, highlight the efficacy of streaming learning strategies over traditional per-instance optimizations. Notably, MAM-StreamICL consistently achieves superior results. This finding is pivotal, showing that even state-of-art LLMs can further improve by employing streaming strategies.

The insights from StreamBench suggest several avenues for future research. Notably, the ability of models to effectively leverage experiential learning mechanisms could inform new architectures that inherently accommodate continuous improvement. This work lays a foundational framework for developing adaptive, online learning strategies for LLMs, potentially revolutionizing their adaptability in dynamic environments.

Conclusion

The advent of StreamBench is a meaningful step forward in the evaluation and development of LLMs. By focusing on continuous improvement in streaming scenarios, this paper paves the way for creating LLMs that can adapt and evolve over time post-deployment. The provision of a standardized, empirical benchmarking tool like StreamBench facilitates further exploration in this promising area, with potential applications spanning numerous real-world tasks. Researchers are encouraged to investigate these methodologies further, amplifying the adaptability and efficiency of intelligent systems.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com