Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning (2405.20139v1)

Published 30 May 2024 in cs.CL, cs.LG, and cs.AI
GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning

Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) represent human-crafted factual knowledge in the form of triplets (head, relation, tail), which collectively form a graph. Question Answering over KGs (KGQA) is the task of answering natural questions grounding the reasoning to the information provided by the KG. LLMs are the state-of-the-art models for QA tasks due to their remarkable ability to understand natural language. On the other hand, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for KGQA as they can handle the complex graph information stored in the KG. In this work, we introduce GNN-RAG, a novel method for combining language understanding abilities of LLMs with the reasoning abilities of GNNs in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) style. First, a GNN reasons over a dense KG subgraph to retrieve answer candidates for a given question. Second, the shortest paths in the KG that connect question entities and answer candidates are extracted to represent KG reasoning paths. The extracted paths are verbalized and given as input for LLM reasoning with RAG. In our GNN-RAG framework, the GNN acts as a dense subgraph reasoner to extract useful graph information, while the LLM leverages its natural language processing ability for ultimate KGQA. Furthermore, we develop a retrieval augmentation (RA) technique to further boost KGQA performance with GNN-RAG. Experimental results show that GNN-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance in two widely used KGQA benchmarks (WebQSP and CWQ), outperforming or matching GPT-4 performance with a 7B tuned LLM. In addition, GNN-RAG excels on multi-hop and multi-entity questions outperforming competing approaches by 8.9--15.5% points at answer F1.

Combining LLMs and Graph Neural Networks for Improved Knowledge Graph Question Answering

The paper presented explores a novel method titled "Gnn-Rag," which synergistically integrates LLMs with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to enhance the performance of Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA). This approach bridges the strengths of LLMs in understanding natural language and the capabilities of GNNs in processing complex graph structures. The underlying challenge of KGQA is to accurately answer natural language questions using the structured information stored in Knowledge Graphs (KGs).

Core Contributions

  1. Framework Design: Gnn-Rag is designed to leverage the dense subgraph reasoning capabilities of GNNs for initial retrieval of candidate answers. These candidates are then verbalized and fed into LLMs for final answer generation. This multi-stage process capitalizes on the unique advantages of GNNs in graph traversal and LLMs in language understanding.
  2. Retrieval Augmentation (RA): The authors introduce a retrieval augmentation technique that further refines the retrieval process by combining outputs from GNN-based retrievers and LLM-based retrievers, thereby enhancing the diversity and accuracy of the retrieved information.
  3. Comprehensive Evaluation: Using two widely recognized KGQA benchmarks—WebQSP and CWQ—the paper demonstrates that Gnn-Rag outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. Remarkably, Gnn-Rag with retrieval augmentation achieves up to 15.5 percentage points improvement in complex question answering tasks.

Experimental Results

The empirical results underscore several key findings:

  • Multi-Hop and Multi-Entity Questions: Gnn-Rag particularly excels in handling multi-hop and multi-entity questions, surpassing competing approaches by substantial margins (8.9–15.5 percentage points in answer F1).
  • Efficiency: Gnn-Rag achieves these improvements without the need for extensive computational resources commonly associated with larger LMs like GPT-4. For instance, Gnn-Rag matches or outperforms GPT-4 using a tuned LLaMA2-Chat-7B model.
  • Faithfulness in Answering: Case studies provided in the paper illustrate how Gnn-Rag improves the faithfulness of LLMs by ensuring that the reasoning paths used for answering are well-grounded in the KG.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of this research are multifaceted, both practically and theoretically:

  • Practical Applications: The Gnn-Rag framework can be highly beneficial in applications requiring accurate and up-to-date information retrieval from expansive databases, such as search engines and virtual assistants. By integrating GNNs and LLMs, the method achieves a balance of computational efficiency and high accuracy.
  • Theoretical Insights: The method brings forth valuable insights into hybrid models that combine graph-based and language-based learning. It paves the way for future research to further refine such hybrid approaches and explore their applications in other domains.

Looking forward, the research opens several avenues:

  1. Scalability to Larger KGs: Future work could explore the scalability of Gnn-Rag to even larger KGs, perhaps integrating distributed GNN techniques or exploring more sophisticated retrieval augmentation methods.
  2. Adaptation to Other Tasks: The principles of combining GNNs with LLMs can be adapted and extended to other graph-based tasks, such as recommendation systems or bioinformatics.
  3. Enhanced Retrieval Techniques: Further refinement of the retrieval augmentation process could involve advanced ensemble methods or the integration of additional context-aware components.

Conclusion

Gnn-Rag represents a significant step forward in the field of KGQA by effectively combining the reasoning strengths of GNNs with the language comprehension capabilities of LLMs. This innovative method demonstrates superior performance on complex QA tasks while maintaining efficiency, potentially setting a new standard for future research in hybrid AI models.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Costas Mavromatis (11 papers)
  2. George Karypis (110 papers)
Citations (18)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Reddit Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Reddit

  1. GNN in RAG method (1 point, 2 comments)