Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment (2405.18634v2)

Published 28 May 2024 in cs.LG, cs.CL, and stat.ML

Abstract: Going beyond mimicking limited human experiences, recent studies show initial evidence that, like humans, LLMs are capable of improving their abilities purely by self-correction, i.e., correcting previous responses through self-examination, in certain circumstances. Nevertheless, little is known about how such capabilities arise. In this work, based on a simplified setup akin to an alignment task, we theoretically analyze self-correction from an in-context learning perspective, showing that when LLMs give relatively accurate self-examinations as rewards, they are capable of refining responses in an in-context way. Notably, going beyond previous theories on over-simplified linear transformers, our theoretical construction underpins the roles of several key designs of realistic transformers for self-correction: softmax attention, multi-head attention, and the MLP block. We validate these findings extensively on synthetic datasets. Inspired by these findings, we also illustrate novel applications of self-correction, such as defending against LLM jailbreaks, where a simple self-correction step does make a large difference. We believe that these findings will inspire further research on understanding, exploiting, and enhancing self-correction for building better foundation models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (88)
  1. Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.00297, 2023a.
  2. Linear attention is (maybe) all you need (to understand transformer optimization). arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.01082, 2023b.
  3. A closer look at in-context learning under distribution shifts. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.16704, 2023.
  4. Detecting language model attacks with perplexity. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.14132, 2023.
  5. Foundational challenges in assuring alignment and safety of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09932, 2024.
  6. Improving adversarial robustness via channel-wise activation suppressing. In ICLR, 2021.
  7. Transformers as statisticians: Provable in-context learning with in-context algorithm selection. In NeurIPS, 2023.
  8. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2212.08073, 2022.
  9. Understanding in-context learning in transformers and llms by learning to learn discrete functions. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.03016, 2023.
  10. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3/4):324–345, 1952.
  11. Defending against alignment-breaking attacks via robustly aligned llm. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.14348, 2023.
  12. Jailbreaking black box large language models in twenty queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08419, 2023.
  13. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. ICML, 2020.
  14. Teaching large language models to self-debug. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.05128, 2023.
  15. When is tree search useful for llm planning? it depends on the discriminator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10890, 2024.
  16. Exploring the robustness of in-context learning with noisy labels. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Reliable and Responsible Foundation Models, 2024.
  17. Transformers implement functional gradient descent to learn non-linear functions in context. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.06528, 2023.
  18. Contrastive chain-of-thought prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2311.09277, 2023.
  19. Multilingual jailbreak challenges in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.06474, 2023.
  20. Causallm is not optimal for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06912, 2023.
  21. Attacks, defenses and evaluations for llm conversation safety: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09283, 2024.
  22. Transformers learn higher-order optimization methods for in-context learning: A study with linear models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.17086, 2023.
  23. The capacity for moral self-correction in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.07459, 2023.
  24. Rarr: Researching and revising what language models say, using language models. In ACL, 2023a.
  25. In-context learning for attention scheme: from single softmax regression to multiple softmax regression via a tensor trick. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02419, 2023b.
  26. What can transformers learn in-context? a case study of simple function classes. NeurIPS, 2022.
  27. Human-instruction-free llm self-alignment with limited samples. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2401.06785, 2024.
  28. Xiaochuang Han. In-context alignment: Chat with vanilla language models before fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.04275, 2023.
  29. Transformer language models without positional encodings still learn positional information, 2022.
  30. Large language models cannot self-correct reasoning yet. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.01798, 2023a.
  31. Catastrophic jailbreak of open-source llms via exploiting generation. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.06987, 2023b.
  32. In-context convergence of transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05249, 2023c.
  33. Baseline defenses for adversarial attacks against aligned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.00614, 2023.
  34. Towards mitigating hallucination in large language models via self-reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06271, 2023.
  35. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.06825, 2023.
  36. Llms can find mathematical reasoning mistakes by pedagogical chain-of-thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06705, 2024.
  37. Language models can solve computer tasks. NEURIPS, 2023.
  38. Certifying llm safety against adversarial prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.02705, 2023.
  39. Open sesame! universal black box jailbreaking of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.01446, 2023.
  40. Confidence matters: Revisiting intrinsic self-correction capabilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12563, 2024.
  41. Transformers as algorithms: Generalization and stability in in-context learning. In ICML, 2023a.
  42. Rain: Your language models can align themselves without finetuning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.07124, 2023b.
  43. The unlocking spell on base llms: Rethinking alignment via in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.01552, 2023.
  44. Criticbench: Benchmarking llms for critique-correct reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14809, 2024.
  45. Autodan: Generating stealthy jailbreak prompts on aligned large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04451, 2023a.
  46. Jailbreaking chatgpt via prompt engineering: An empirical study. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.13860, 2023b.
  47. Are emergent abilities in large language models just in-context learning? arXiv preprint arXiv: 2309.01809, 2023.
  48. R Duncan Luce. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Courier Corporation, 2005.
  49. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. NeurIPS, 2023.
  50. Fight back against jailbreaking via prompt adversarial tuning. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Large Language Models, 2024.
  51. Learning with noisy labels. Advances in neural information processing systems, 26, 2013.
  52. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018.
  53. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. NeurIPS, 2022.
  54. Automatically correcting large language models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03188, 2023.
  55. Bbq: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2110.08193, 2021.
  56. Transformers can optimally learn regression mixture models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2311.08362, 2023.
  57. Refiner: Reasoning feedback on intermediate representations. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.01904, 2023.
  58. Robin L Plackett. The analysis of permutations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 24(2):193–202, 1975.
  59. Fine-tuning aligned language models compromises safety, even when users do not intend to! arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.03693, 2023.
  60. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. ICML, 2021.
  61. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. NeurIPS, 2023.
  62. Self-reflection in llm agents: Effects on problem-solving performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06682, 2024.
  63. "do anything now": Characterizing and evaluating in-the-wild jailbreak prompts on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03825, 2023.
  64. Autoprompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2010.15980, 2020.
  65. Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2023.
  66. Preference ranking optimization for human alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.17492, 2023.
  67. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.09288, 2023.
  68. Llms cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them! arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08516, 2023.
  69. Can large language models really improve by self-critiquing their own plans? arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.08118, 2023.
  70. The art of defending: A systematic evaluation and analysis of llm defense strategies on safety and over-defensiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2401.00287, 2023.
  71. Attention is all you need. NeurIPS, 2017.
  72. Vicuna. "vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90quality, 2023. URL https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-03-30-vicuna/.
  73. Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent. In ICML, 2023.
  74. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461, 2018.
  75. Large language models are implicitly topic models: Explaining and finding good demonstrations for in-context learning. In Workshop on Efficient Systems for Foundation Models, 2023.
  76. Jailbreak and guard aligned language models with only few in-context demonstrations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06387, 2023.
  77. How many pretraining tasks are needed for in-context learning of linear regression? arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.08391, 2023.
  78. Defending chatgpt against jailbreak attack via self-reminders. Nature Machine Intelligence, pages 1–11, 2023.
  79. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10601, 2023.
  80. Low-resource languages jailbreak gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.02446, 2023.
  81. GPT-4 is too smart to be safe: Stealthy chat with LLMs via cipher. In ICLR, 2024.
  82. Trained transformers learn linear models in-context. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.09927, 2023a.
  83. Boosting jailbreak attack with momentum. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Reliable and Responsible Foundation Models, 2024.
  84. What and how does in-context learning learn? bayesian model averaging, parameterization, and generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.19420, 2023b.
  85. Small language models need strong verifiers to self-correct reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2404.17140, 2024.
  86. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.05685, 2023.
  87. Autodan: Automatic and interpretable adversarial attacks on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.15140, 2023.
  88. Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.15043, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Yifei Wang (141 papers)
  2. Yuyang Wu (9 papers)
  3. Zeming Wei (24 papers)
  4. Stefanie Jegelka (122 papers)
  5. Yisen Wang (120 papers)
Citations (8)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

Theoretical Exploration of Self-Correction Mechanisms through In-context Alignment in LLMs

The paper presented in "A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment" explores the theoretical underpinnings of self-correction capabilities in LLMs, employing a perspective grounded in in-context learning (ICL). Recent empirical studies have suggested that LLMs possess the potential to self-correct their outputs in the absence of external feedback, a notion traditionally seen as a haLLMark of human cognition. The paper at hand seeks to formalize and theoretically support this self-corrective potential by viewing it as an alignment task adaptable through in-context learning frameworks.

The authors propose the notion of in-context alignment (ICA) where LLMs refine their outputs dynamically during inference, contingent upon feedback provided within their context. This involves assimilating what the authors term "triplet examples" comprising a query, a response, and a reward. This formulation facilitates the LLM's ability to restrictively adjust its outputs, aligning itself closer to human preferences even in the absence of direct supervision, thus extending the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).

From a theoretical standpoint, the paper chiefly focuses on demonstrating that transformers, the core architecture underlying LLMs, can optimize alignment objectives in an in-context manner. The researchers underpin their paper with a gradient descent framework aimed at minimizing ranking-based objectives, specifically utilizing the Bradley-Terry and Plackett-Luce models. This theoretical construct reveals that components intrinsic to transformers, such as multi-head self-attention (MHSA) and feed-forward networks (FFN), can be systematically adapted to perform optimization tasks traditionally reserved for external training loops, albeit now executed in-context.

The paper meticulously dissects the roles of different components of transformers such as softmax attention, multi-head configurations, and stacked layers. It notes how these elements are critical in decoding the alignment task by facilitating discrete token discrimination, reward ranking, and iterative refinement processes. Interestingly, the theoretical exploration concludes that in the presence of noisy feedback or rewards, the self-correcting ability of the LLM may be compromised, underscoring the dependence of alignment quality on the reliability of internal or self-generated criticism.

The investigation transitions from theoretical constructs to practical validation through synthetic dataset experiments, demonstrating that transformers indeed possess capabilities akin to gradient descent when presented with sufficient in-context examples. The synthetic data experiments anxiously point to the importance of full transformer architectures, deviations from which have been shown to significantly impede in-context alignment efficacy.

Complementing the synthetic validations, the paper also ventures into real-world implications by testing self-correction effects on social bias mitigation and jailbreak attack scenarios. Here, the authors articulate the promise of employing intrinsic self-correction (one devoid of external training) to refine LLMs' alignment postures effectively. The results underline substantial improvements in task-specific alignment efforts, paving pathways for exploring self-corrective measures as a plausible augmentation to LLM alignment strategies.

In conclusion, this research not only furthers our conceptual understanding of LLM self-correction but also emphasizes the profound interplay between architectural design choices and the LLMs' emergent capabilities in context. By embedding a theoretically robust framework to an empirical premise, the paper initiates a discourse on aligning large-scale LLMs with human intentions via self-generated context, potentially propagating future models less dependent on exhaustive fine-tuning phases. The insights granted open new horizons for subsequent explorations into more autonomous AI systems that continuously refine their decision-making processes through reflective self-analysis.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown