Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-5
GPT-4o
DeepSeek R1 via Azure
2000 character limit reached

IM-Context: In-Context Learning for Imbalanced Regression Tasks (2405.18202v2)

Published 28 May 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Regression models often fail to generalize effectively in regions characterized by highly imbalanced label distributions. Previous methods for deep imbalanced regression rely on gradient-based weight updates, which tend to overfit in underrepresented regions. This paper proposes a paradigm shift towards in-context learning as an effective alternative to conventional in-weight learning methods, particularly for addressing imbalanced regression. In-context learning refers to the ability of a model to condition itself, given a prompt sequence composed of in-context samples (input-label pairs) alongside a new query input to generate predictions, without requiring any parameter updates. In this paper, we study the impact of the prompt sequence on the model performance from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. We emphasize the importance of localized context in reducing bias within regions of high imbalance. Empirical evaluations across a variety of real-world datasets demonstrate that in-context learning substantially outperforms existing in-weight learning methods in scenarios with high levels of imbalance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  2. What learning algorithm is in-context learning? investigations with linear models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  3. Deep evidential regression. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020.
  4. Transformers as statisticians: Provable in-context learning with in-context algorithm selection, 2023.
  5. Simplicity bias in transformers and their ability to learn sparse boolean functions, 2023.
  6. Smogn: a pre-processing approach for imbalanced regression. In First international workshop on learning with imbalanced domains: Theory and applications, pages 36–50. PMLR, 2017.
  7. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  8. Learning imbalanced datasets with label-distribution-aware margin loss. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  9. Data distributional properties drive emergent in-context learning in transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18878–18891, 2022.
  10. Aerodynamic design optimization and shape exploration using generative adversarial networks. In AIAA Scitech 2019 forum, page 2351, 2019.
  11. Andrew Frank. Uci machine learning repository. http://archive. ics. uci. edu/ml, 2010.
  12. What can transformers learn in-context? a case study of simple function classes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:30583–30598, 2022.
  13. RankSim: Ranking similarity regularization for deep imbalanced regression. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2022.
  14. Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5(1):81–102, 1978.
  15. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, volume 2. Springer, 2009.
  16. Pcdgan: A continuous conditional diverse generative adversarial network for inverse design. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery; Data Mining, KDD ’21. ACM, August 2021.
  17. Improving contrastive learning on imbalanced data via open-world sampling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:5997–6009, 2021.
  18. Conr: Contrastive regularizer for deep imbalanced regression. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  19. One step of gradient descent is provably the optimal in-context learner with one layer of linear self-attention. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  20. Colin McDiarmid et al. On the method of bounded differences. Surveys in combinatorics, 141(1):148–188, 1989.
  21. Agedb: the first manually collected, in-the-wild age database. In proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 51–59, 2017.
  22. Pfns4bo: In-context learning for bayesian optimization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 25444–25470. PMLR, 2023.
  23. Transformers can do bayesian inference. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  24. Thomas Nagler. Statistical foundations of prior-data fitted networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 25660–25676. PMLR, 2023.
  25. Abalone. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C55C7W.
  26. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011.
  27. Untrained and Unmatched: Fast and Accurate Zero-Training Classification for Tabular Engineering Data. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(9):091705, 03 2024.
  28. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision, 2021.
  29. Michael Redmond. Communities and Crime. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C53W3X.
  30. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 11 2019.
  31. Balanced mse for imbalanced visual regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7926–7935, 2022.
  32. Deep expectation of real and apparent age from a single image without facial landmarks. International Journal of Computer Vision, 126(2):144–157, 2018.
  33. Moving window regression: A novel approach to ordinal regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18760–18769, June 2022.
  34. Density-based weighting for imbalanced regression. Machine Learning, 110:2187–2211, 2021.
  35. Boris van Breugel and Mihaela van der Schaar. Why tabular foundation models should be a research priority. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01147, 2024.
  36. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  37. Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 35151–35174. PMLR, 2023.
  38. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In Tal Linzen, Grzegorz Chrupała, and Afra Alishahi, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 353–355, Brussels, Belgium, November 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  39. A unified generalization analysis of re-weighting and logit-adjustment for imbalanced learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  40. Variational imbalanced regression: Fair uncertainty quantification via probabilistic smoothing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  41. Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9):1526–1541, 2023.
  42. An explanation of in-context learning as implicit bayesian inference. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  43. Rethinking the value of labels for improving class-imbalanced learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:19290–19301, 2020.
  44. Delving into deep imbalanced regression. In International conference on machine learning, pages 11842–11851. PMLR, 2021.
  45. I-Cheng Yeh. Concrete Compressive Strength. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5PK67.
  46. Deep long-tailed learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.

Summary

  • The paper presents IM-Context, an innovative method that uses localized in-context learning to mitigate bias in imbalanced regression.
  • It demonstrates that selecting only the closest context samples significantly improves accuracy, especially in few-shot and sparse regions.
  • Empirical results on datasets like AgeDB-DIR and STS-B-DIR confirm that IM-Context consistently outperforms traditional in-weight learning approaches.

In-Context Learning for Imbalanced Regression Tasks

Introduction

The challenges of imbalanced regression, distinct from imbalanced classification, are increasingly relevant in various applications like age estimation in computer vision and engineering design. Where traditional regression models often falter due to their bias toward majority labels and a tendency to overfit underrepresented regions, a novel approach dubbed In-Context Learning (ICL) aims to address these limitations. This paper introduces IM-Context, a method leveraging in-context learning for imbalanced regression tasks, demonstrating its efficacy over conventional in-weight learning methods.

Key Concepts and Problem Setting

Imbalanced data distributions complicate the generalization capabilities of regression models. Existing solutions have primarily revolved around in-weight learning, including sample re-weighting and embedding space regularization techniques, which attempt to smooth label distributions or enforce similarity between samples in feature space. These methods rely on gradient updates to model weights, which inherently limit their ability to generalize in tail regions of the data.

In contrast, in-context learning models adapt to new tasks using context examples without any parameter updates. For a given query input, ICL models leverage a sequence of in-context samples—pairs of inputs and corresponding labels—to generate predictions. This paradigm shift offers a potential solution to the overfitting issues faced by in-weight learning models in minority regions.

Methodology

The IM-Context approach addresses the imbalanced regression challenge by emphasizing localized context. Theoretical analysis reveals that using a large, indiscriminate context can bias models toward majority regions. The proposed strategy mitigates this by considering only the 'closest' in-context samples for a new query, which reduces bias and memory requirements.

Empirical studies validate these theoretical findings. The authors showed that, in dense regions, the error remains stable regardless of context size, while in sparse regions, increasing the context size actually worsens performance. The localized approach, which retrieves neighboring samples from both the original training set and an augmented set (inverse density dataset), consistently demonstrates improved performance.

Results

The IM-Context framework was evaluated on eight imbalanced regression tasks. On AgeDB-DIR and IMDB-WIKI-DIR datasets, in-context learning with the proposed localized approach outperforms state-of-the-art in-weight learning methods across many benchmarks. Particularly impressive are its gains in few-shot regions, where traditional methods typically struggle the most. In one instance, the method reduced the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) by 1.4 points in the AgeDB-DIR few-shot category.

Similarly, for STS-B-DIR, which involves text similarity estimation, the localized in-context learning approach yielded substantial improvements in Mean Squared Error (MSE) across all shot regions. In the tabular datasets, which vary widely in feature size and imbalance degree, the localized in-context learning method outperformed several machine learning baselines, notably reducing errors in medium and few-shot regions.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings underscore the potential of in-context learning in addressing imbalanced regression tasks. Practically, these results suggest a shift in how we approach regression in data-scarce environments, favoring models that can adapt contextually without retraining. This has significant implications for fields like personalized medicine, autonomous driving, and financial forecasting, where data imbalance is common, and accurate predictions are critical.

Theoretically, the paper expands on the understanding of how context size influences error, particularly highlighting the trade-offs in dense versus sparse labels. The localized retrieval strategy offers a pathway to mitigate biases inherent in training data distributions.

Future research could explore the application of IM-Context to more complex regression tasks, such as those with multi-dimensional labels, and investigate how other model variants can further enhance performance. Additionally, studying the impact of different sampling strategies on retrieval accuracy and model performance could yield further insights into optimizing in-context learning methodologies for diverse applications.

Conclusion

This paper makes a compelling case for in-context learning as a robust solution to the perennial issue of label imbalance in regression tasks. The IM-Context framework leverages contextual adaptation, significantly outperforming traditional in-weight learning methods, especially in underrepresented regions. These findings mark a step forward in the practical application and theoretical understanding of in-context learning, promising broader, more effective deployment in various high-stake domains.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.