Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Beyond the Buzz: Strategic Paths for Enabling Useful NISQ Applications (2405.14561v1)

Published 23 May 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: There is much debate on whether quantum computing on current NISQ devices, consisting of noisy hundred qubits and requiring a non-negligible usage of classical computing as part of the algorithms, has utility and will ever offer advantages for scientific and industrial applications with respect to traditional computing. In this position paper, we argue that while real-world NISQ quantum applications have yet to surpass their classical counterparts, strategic approaches can be used to facilitate advancements in both industrial and scientific applications. We have identified three key strategies to guide NISQ computing towards practical and useful implementations. Firstly, prioritizing the identification of a "killer app" is a key point. An application demonstrating the distinctive capabilities of NISQ devices can catalyze broader development. We suggest focusing on applications that are inherently quantum, e.g., pointing towards quantum chemistry and material science as promising domains. These fields hold the potential to exhibit benefits, setting benchmarks for other applications to follow. Secondly, integrating AI and deep-learning methods into NISQ computing is a promising approach. Examples such as quantum Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Differentiable Quantum Circuits (DQC) demonstrate the synergy between quantum computing and AI. Lastly, recognizing the interdisciplinary nature of NISQ computing, we advocate for a co-design approach. Achieving synergy between classical and quantum computing necessitates an effort in co-designing quantum applications, algorithms, and programming environments, and the integration of HPC with quantum hardware. The interoperability of these components is crucial for enabling the full potential of NISQ computing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Co-Design quantum simulation of nanoscale NMR. Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (Nov 2022), 043089. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043089
  2. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 7779 (Oct. 2019), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
  3. Quantum speed-up for unsupervised learning. Machine Learning 90, 2 (Feb. 2013), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-012-5316-5
  4. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Reviews of Modern Physics 94, 1 (2022), 015004.
  5. Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 7671 (Sept. 2017), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
  6. Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits. Nature Communications 12, 1 (March 2021), 1791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w
  7. Computation of Molecular Spectra on a Quantum Processor with an Error-Resilient Algorithm. Phys. Rev. X 8 (Feb 2018), 011021. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011021
  8. Variational fast forwarding for quantum simulation beyond the coherence time. npj Quantum Information 6, 1 (Sept. 2020), 82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-00302-0
  9. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature 607, 7920 (July 2022), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6
  10. Variational quantum algorithm for molecular geometry optimization. Phys. Rev. A 104 (Nov 2021), 052402. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.052402
  11. Electronic density response of warm dense matter. Physics of Plasmas 30, 3 (2023), 032705. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0138955
  12. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028 arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph].
  13. Jay Gambetta. 2022. IBM Quantum Computing Blog | Quantum-centric supercomputing: The next wave of computing. (2022). https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/next-wave-quantum-centric-supercomputing
  14. Craig Gidney and Martin Ekerå. 2021. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits. Quantum 5 (April 2021), 433. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433
  15. XPRIZE Google Quantum AI. 2024. Quantum for real-world impact. https://www.xprize.org/prizes/qc-apps
  16. An initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits. Quantum 3 (Dec. 2019), 214. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-09-214
  17. Modelling carbon capture on metal-organic frameworks with quantum computing. EPJ Quantum Technology 9, 1 (Dec. 2022), 37. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00155-w
  18. Quantum Algorithm for Linear Systems of Equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (Oct 2009), 150502. Issue 15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502
  19. The data-driven future of high-energy-density physics. Nature 593 (2021), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03382-w
  20. Disentangling Hype from Practicality: On Realistically Achieving Quantum Advantage. Commun. ACM 66, 5 (apr 2023), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571725
  21. Tadashi Kadowaki and Hidetoshi Nishimori. 1998. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58 (Nov 1998), 5355–5363. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355
  22. Solving nonlinear differential equations with differentiable quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. A 103 (May 2021), 052416. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052416
  23. NISQ computing: where are we and where do we go? AAPPS Bulletin 32, 1 (Sept. 2022), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43673-022-00058-z
  24. Quantum principal component analysis. Nature Physics 10, 9 (Sept. 2014), 631–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3029
  25. Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems. Phys. Rev. A 101 (Jan 2020), 010301. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.010301
  26. Quantum simulation of electronic structure with a transcorrelated Hamiltonian: improved accuracy with a smaller footprint on the quantum computer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (2020), 24270–24281. Issue 42. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP04106H
  27. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications 5, 1 (July 2014), 4213. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213
  28. John Preskill. 2018. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2 (Aug. 2018), 79. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
  29. Quantum Support Vector Machine for Big Data Classification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (Sep 2014), 130503. Issue 13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.130503
  30. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 29 (2017), 7555–7560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619152114
  31. Resource-efficient quantum algorithm for protein folding. npj Quantum Information 7, 1 (Feb. 2021), 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00368-4
  32. Teague Tomesh and Margaret Martonosi. 2021. Quantum Codesign. IEEE Micro 41, 5 (2021), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2021.3094461
  33. Quantum algorithms for nearest-neighbor methods for supervised and unsupervised learning. Quantum Info. Comput. 15, 3–4 (mar 2015), 316–356.
Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com