Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Greedy Quantum Route-Generation Algorithm (2405.03054v1)

Published 5 May 2024 in quant-ph, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Routing and scheduling problems with time windows have long been important optimization problems for logistics and planning. Many classical heuristics and exact methods exist for such problems. However, there are no satisfactory methods for generating routes using quantum computing (QC), for mainly two reasons: inequality constraints, and the trade-off of feasibility and solution quality. Inequality constraints are typically handled using slack variables; and feasible solutions are found by filtering samples. These challenges are amplified in the presence of noise inherent in QC. Here, we propose a greedy algorithm that generates routes by using information from all samples obtained from the quantum computer. By noticing the relationship between qubits in our formulation as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we designed an algorithm that adaptively constructs a feasible solution. We prove its convergence to a feasible solution, and illustrate its efficacy by solving the Fleet Sizing Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (FSVRPTW). Our computational results show that this method obtains a lower objective value than the current state-of-the-art annealing approaches, both classical and hybrid, for the same amount of time using D-Wave Hybrid Solvers. We also show its robustness to noise on D-Wave Advantage 4.1 through computational results as compared to the filtering approach on DWaveSampler, even when the filtering approach is given a longer annealing time, and a larger sample size.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. A hybrid solution method for the capacitated vehicle routing problem using a quantum annealer. Frontiers in ICT, 6:13, 2019.
  2. A systematic literature review of quantum computing for routing problems. IEEE Access, 10:55805–55817, 2022.
  3. Unconstrained binary models of the travelling salesman problem variants for quantum optimization. Quantum Information Processing, 21(2):67, 2022.
  4. A qubo model for the traveling salesman problem with time windows. Algorithms, 12(11):224, 2019.
  5. Quantum annealing of vehicle routing problem with time, state and capacity. In Quantum Technology and Optimization Problems: First International Workshop, QTOP 2019, Munich, Germany, March 18, 2019, Proceedings 1, pages 145–156. Springer, 2019.
  6. Formulating and solving routing problems on quantum computers. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2:1–17, 2021.
  7. Scaling vehicle routing problem solvers with qubo-based specialized hardware. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC), pages 381–386. IEEE, 2022.
  8. Quantum-assisted solution paths for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), volume 1, pages 648–658. IEEE, 2023.
  9. Dimitris Angelakis. Qubit efficient quantum algorithms for the vehicle routing problem on nisq processors. Bulletin of the American Physical Society, 2024.
  10. Utilizing modern computer architectures to solve mathematical optimization problems: A survey. Computers & Chemical Engineering, page 108627, 2024.
  11. Quantum-assisted greedy algorithms. In IGARSS 2022-2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pages 4911–4914. IEEE, 2022.
  12. Quantum-enhanced greedy combinatorial optimization solver. Science Advances, 9(45):eadi0487, 2023.
  13. Extending relax-and-round combinatorial optimization solvers with quantum correlations. Physical Review A, 109(1):012429, 2024.
  14. Improving performance in combinatorial optimization problems with inequality constraints: An evaluation of the unbalanced penalization method on d-wave advantage, 2023.
  15. John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, August 2018.
  16. Mathematical foundation of quantum annealing. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 49(12), 2008.
  17. Adiabatic quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(1):015002, 2018.
  18. dwave-neal 2014; dwave-neal 0.5.9 documentation — docs.ocean.dwavesys.com. https://docs.ocean.dwavesys.com/projects/neal. [Accessed 26-04-2024].
  19. Marius M Solomon. Algorithms for the vehicle routing and scheduling problems with time window constraints. Operations research, 35(2):254–265, 1987.
  20. Power of pausing: Advancing understanding of thermalization in experimental quantum annealers. Physical Review Applied, 11(4):044083, 2019.
  21. Ocean Documentation 6.10.0 documentation. https://docs.ocean.dwavesys.com/en/stable/docs_cloud/reference/generated/dwave.cloud.solver.StructuredSolver.estimate_qpu_access_time.html. [Accessed 01-05-2024].

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com