Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 117 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Box Contraction for Solving Linear Systems via Simulated and Quantum Annealing (2405.03029v1)

Published 5 May 2024 in cs.CE

Abstract: Solving linear systems of equations is an important problem in science and engineering. Many quantum algorithms, such as the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm (for quantum-gate computers) and the box algorithm (for quantum-annealing machines), have been proposed for solving such systems. The focus of this paper is on improving the efficiency of the box algorithm. The basic principle behind this algorithm is to transform the linear system into a series of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems, which are then solved on annealing machines. The computational efficiency of the box algorithm is entirely determined by the number of iterations, which, in turn, depends on the box contraction ratio, typically set to 0.5. Here, we show through theory that a contraction ratio of 0.5 is sub-optimal and that we can achieve a speed-up with a contraction ratio of 0.2. This is confirmed through numerical experiments where a speed-up between $20 \%$ to $60 \%$ is observed when the optimal contraction ratio is used.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. \bibcommenthead
  2. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering p. 75 (2022)
  3. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 23(6) (2023)
  4. Physical review letters 103(15), 150502 (2009)
  5. A. Ambainis, Variable time amplitude amplification and a faster quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.4458 (2010)
  6. SIAM Journal on Computing 46(6), 1920–1950 (2017)
  7. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2333(1), 012023 (2022)
  8. PRX Quantum 3(4), 040303 (2022)
  9. J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018)
  10. Physical review letters 110(25), 250504 (2013)
  11. arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.7087 (2014)
  12. Reports on Progress in Physics 83(5), 054401 (2020)
  13. Reports on Progress in Physics (2022)
  14. PloS one 13(12), e0206653 (2018)
  15. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10576 (2022)
  16. Physical Review A 104(3), 032426 (2021)
  17. Physical Review A 99(5), 052355 (2019)
  18. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 395, 115014 (2022)
  19. IEEE Transactions on Computers 71(4), 838–850 (2021)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com