Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 99 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

EEvA: Fast Expert-Based Algorithms for Buffer Page Replacement (2405.00154v1)

Published 30 Apr 2024 in cs.DB

Abstract: Optimal page replacement is an important problem in efficient buffer management. The range of replacement strategies known in the literature varies from simple but efficient FIFO-based algorithms to more accurate but potentially costly methods tailored to specific data access patterns. The principal issue in adopting a pattern-specific replacement logic in a DB buffer manager is to guarantee non-degradation in general high-load regimes. In this paper, we propose a new family of page replacement algorithms for DB buffer manager which demonstrate a superior performance wrt competitors on custom data access patterns and imply a low computational overhead on TPC-C. We provide theoretical foundations and an extensive experimental study on the proposed algorithms which covers synthetic benchmarks and an implementation in an open-source DB kernel evaluated on TPC-C.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Fifo queues are all you need for cache eviction. In Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pages 130–149, 2023.
  2. Fifo cache analysis for wcet estimation: A quantitative approach. In 2013 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pages 296–301. IEEE, 2013.
  3. Fifo can be better than lru: the power of lazy promotion and quick demotion. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, pages 70–79, 2023.
  4. Fast and exact analysis for lru caches. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 3(POPL):1–29, 2019.
  5. Evaluation techniques for storage hierarchies. IBM Systems journal, 9(2):78–117, 1970.
  6. Eelru: simple and effective adaptive page replacement. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 27(1):122–133, 1999.
  7. Cflru: a replacement algorithm for flash memory. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Compilers, architecture and synthesis for embedded systems, pages 234–241, 2006.
  8. Cfdc: a flash-aware replacement policy for database buffer management. In Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on data management on new hardware, pages 15–20, 2009.
  9. The lru-k page replacement algorithm for database disk buffering. Acm Sigmod Record, 22(2):297–306, 1993.
  10. Caching strategies to improve disk system performance. Computer, 27(3):38–46, 1994.
  11. Principles of database buffer management. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 9(4):560–595, 1984.
  12. 2q: a low overhead high performance buffer management replacement algorithm. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 439–450. Citeseer, 1994.
  13. Tinylfu: A highly efficient cache admission policy. ACM Transactions on Storage (ToS), 13(4):1–31, 2017.
  14. Onlinemin: A fast strongly competitive randomized paging algorithm. Theory of Computing Systems, 56:22–40, 2015.
  15. Competitive paging algorithms. Journal of Algorithms, 12(4):685–699, 1991.
  16. A strongly competitive randomized paging algorithm. Algorithmica, 6(1):816–825, 1991.
  17. A primal-dual randomized algorithm for weighted paging. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 59(4):1–24, 2012.
  18. Competitive algorithms for block-aware caching. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pages 161–172, 2022.
  19. A survey on ai for storage. CCF Transactions on High Performance Computing, 4(3):233–264, 2022.
  20. Online algorithms with advice: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(2):1–34, 2017.
  21. Competitive caching with machine learned advice. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 68(4):1–25, 2021.
  22. Laszlo A. Belady. A study of replacement algorithms for a virtual-storage computer. IBM Systems journal, 5(2):78–101, 1966.
  23. A survey of machine learning for computer architecture and systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(3):1–39, 2022.
  24. Learning to cache with no regrets. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 235–243. IEEE, 2019.
  25. Driving cache replacement with {{\{{ML-based}}\}}{{\{{LeCaR}}\}}. In 10th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems (HotStorage 18), 2018.
  26. Learning cache replacement with CACHEUS. In 19th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST 21), pages 341–354, 2021.
  27. Prediction, learning, and games. Cambridge university press, 2006.
  28. Elad Hazan et al. Introduction to online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2(3-4):157–325, 2016.
  29. Following the perturbed leader for online structured learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1034–1042. PMLR, 2015.
  30. A survey on indexing techniques for big data: taxonomy and performance evaluation. Knowledge and information systems, 46:241–284, 2016.
  31. Handbook of Markov decision processes: methods and applications, volume 40. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  32. openGauss. Enterprise-grade open-source relational database. https://opengauss.org/en/, (accessed April, 2024).
  33. TPC-C. Online transaction processing benchmark. https://www.tpc.org/tpcc/, (accessed April, 2024).
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces an expert-based framework that leverages online convex optimization to optimize DBMS buffer page replacement and reduce transaction latency.
  • The paper's experimental evaluation shows that EEvA variants, such as EEvA-Greedy and EEvA-T, consistently outperform traditional FIFO and recency-based approaches in lowering miss rates.
  • The paper demonstrates that the EEvA framework can balance computational efficiency with improved buffer hit ratios, making it well-suited for modern DBMS deployments.

Expert-Based Algorithms for Buffer Page Replacement in Database Systems

The paper "EEvA: Fast Expert-Based Algorithms for Buffer Page Replacement" addresses the persistent challenge of page replacement in database management systems (DBMS) buffer management. The research delineates an innovative family of algorithms, branded as EEvA, which harness the power of expert systems to optimize the page replacement process while minimizing computational overhead, even under high-load conditions. This approach competes directly with traditional methods ranging from simple FIFO-based to intricate recency- and frequency-based strategies.

The core contribution of the paper lies in establishing a novel expert-based framework capable of effectively tackling varying data access patterns while maintaining superior performance metrics concerning buffer hit ratios and transaction latencies. The authors propose several heuristic-based instances of the EEvA algorithm, including EEvA-Greedy, EEvA-Seq, and EEvA-T, each suited for different operational scenarios or constraints.

One of the key strengths of the paper is its theoretical foundation, explicating the alignment between optimal page replacement and online convex optimization. Particularly interesting is how buffer state dynamics are captured via a Markov Decision Process (MDP), facilitating the quantification of regret bounds that underscore the efficacy of the EEvA approach.

The in-depth experimental evaluation constitutes another substantial aspect of the research. Through synthetic benchmarks as well as a comparative implementation in an open-source DB kernel, the paper evidences EEvA's superior performance over contemporary strategies across various metrics and scenarios. For example, EEvA-T and EEvA-Greedy consistently emerge as notably effective in minimizing miss rates while EEvA-Seq demonstrates the potential for low computational overhead, reinforcing its viability for real-world DBMS deployments.

In exploring practical implications, the paper's findings point towards the adaptability of the EEvA framework in modern DB systems, wherein storage technologies like SSDs necessitate more nuanced eviction strategies to align with I/O operation speed advancements. The reduced computational cost associated with EEvA algorithms further enhances their appeal for applications requiring efficient buffer utilization without substantial impacts on query latency.

Furthermore, the research hints at broader applications within AI and machine learning contexts, particularly in relation to expert systems and online learning mechanisms. Future exploration could focus on expanding the use of expert-based models, potentially integrating them with ML-based algorithms to further augment prediction accuracy and system adaptability.

In conclusion, the paper offers a rigorous yet accessible suite of methodologies for optimizing DBMS buffer management. Its innovative approach in leveraging online learning paradigms introduces promising avenues for both theoretical and practical advancements. The implications of EEvA's success hold significant potential for shaping future developments in sophisticated, high-efficiency data systems.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.