Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 419 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Revisiting the apparent horizon finding problem with multigrid methods (2404.16511v2)

Published 25 Apr 2024 in gr-qc, astro-ph.HE, and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: Apparent horizon plays an important role in numerical relativity as it provides a tool to characterize the existence and properties of black holes on three-dimensional spatial slices in 3+1 numerical spacetimes. Apparent horizon finders based on different techniques have been developed. In this paper, we revisit the apparent horizon finding problem in numerical relativity using multigrid-based algorithms. We formulate the nonlinear elliptic apparent horizon equation as a linear Poisson-type equation with a nonlinear source, and solve it using a multigrid algorithm with Gauss-Seidel line relaxation. A fourth order compact finite difference scheme in spherical coordinates is derived and employed to reduce the complexity of the line relaxation operator to a tri-diagonal matrix inversion. The multigrid-based apparent horizon finder developed in this work is capable of locating apparent horizons in generic spatial hypersurfaces without any symmetries. The finder is tested with both analytic data, such as Brill-Lindquist multiple black hole data, and numerical data, including off-centered Kerr-Schild data and dynamical inspiraling binary black hole data. The obtained results are compared with those generated by the current fastest finder AHFinderDirect (Thornburg, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 743, 2003), which is the default finder in the open source code Einstein Toolkit. Our finder performs comparatively in terms of accuracy, and starts to outperform AHFinderDirect at high angular resolutions (\sim 1\circ) in terms of speed. Our finder is also more flexible to initial guess, as opposed to the Newton's method used in AHFinderDirect. This suggests that the multigrid algorithm provides an alternative option for studying apparent horizons, especially when high resolutions are needed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Ashtekar A and Krishnan B 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68(10) 104030
  2. Ashtekar A and Krishnan B 2004 Living Reviews in Relativity 7 1–91
  3. Baiotti L and Rezzolla L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(14) 141101
  4. Barros S R 1991 Journal of Computational Physics 92 313–348
  5. Baruch G, Fibich G and Tsynkov S 2009 Journal of Computational Physics 228 3789–3815
  6. Baumgarte T W and Shapiro S L 2010 Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer (Cambridge University Press)
  7. Bozzola G 2021 The Journal of Open Source Software 6 3099
  8. Brandt A 1977 Mathematics of computation 31 333–390
  9. Brandt S and Brügmann B 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(19) 3606–3609
  10. Briggs W L, Henson V E and McCormick S F 2000 A multigrid tutorial (SIAM)
  11. Brill D R and Lindquist R W 1963 Phys. Rev. 131(1) 471–476
  12. Britt S, Tsynkov S and Turkel E 2010 Journal of Scientific Computing 45 26–47
  13. Cheong P C K, Lin L M and Li T G F 2020 Classical and Quantum Gravity 37 145015
  14. Choptuik M and Unruh W G 1986 General relativity and gravitation 18 813–843
  15. Collatz L 1960 The numerical treatment of differential equations (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg)
  16. Deriaz E 2020 BIT Numerical Mathematics 60 199–233
  17. East W E, Ramazanoğlu F M and Pretorius F 2012 Phys. Rev. D 86(10) 104053
  18. Ge Y 2010 Journal of Computational Physics 229 6381–6391
  19. Hawking S W and Ellis G F R 1973 The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press)
  20. Lai M C and Tseng J M 2007 Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 201 175–181
  21. Lin L M and Novak J 2007 Classical and Quantum Gravity 24 2665
  22. Misner C W, Thorne K S and Wheeler J A 1973 Gravitation (Macmillan)
  23. Penrose R 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett. 14(3) 57–59
  24. Pook-Kolb D, Hennigar R A and Booth I 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(18) 181101
  25. Schnetter E 2003 Classical and Quantum Gravity 20 4719
  26. Schnetter E, Krishnan B and Beyer F 2006 Phys. Rev. D 74(2) 024028
  27. Shibata M 1997 Phys. Rev. D 55(4) 2002–2013
  28. Thornburg J 1996 Phys. Rev. D 54(8) 4899–4918
  29. Thornburg J 2003 Classical and Quantum Gravity 21 743
  30. Thornburg J 2007 Living Reviews in Relativity 10 1–68
  31. Trottenberg U, Oosterlee C W and Schuller A 2000 Multigrid (Elsevier)
  32. Wesseling P 1992 An introduction to multigrid methods (Wiley)
  33. Zhang J 2002 Journal of Computational Physics 179 170–179
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)