Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Enhancing Q&A with Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning: A Comparative Study (2404.11792v2)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.AI

Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of domain-specific model fine-tuning and of reasoning mechanisms on the performance of question-answering (Q&A) systems powered by LLMs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Using the FinanceBench SEC financial filings dataset, we observe that, for RAG, combining a fine-tuned embedding model with a fine-tuned LLM achieves better accuracy than generic models, with relatively greater gains attributable to fine-tuned embedding models. Additionally, employing reasoning iterations on top of RAG delivers an even bigger jump in performance, enabling the Q&A systems to get closer to human-expert quality. We discuss the implications of such findings, propose a structured technical design space capturing major technical components of Q&A AI, and provide recommendations for making high-impact technical choices for such components. We plan to follow up on this work with actionable guides for AI teams and further investigations into the impact of domain-specific augmentation in RAG and into agentic AI capabilities such as advanced planning and reasoning.

Enhancing Question-Answering AI with Fine-Tuning and Iterative Reasoning on Financial Data

Introduction

The evolution of AI-powered question-answering systems has progressed significantly with the development of LLMs and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques. Despite their capabilities, these systems often struggle with domain-specific queries, such as those derived from financial data. This paper explores the impact of model fine-tuning and iterative reasoning on the performance of question-answering systems using the FinanceBench dataset, which involves complex queries from SEC financial filings.

Fine-Tuning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The research presents a detailed examination of fine-tuning both the embedding and generative models within RAG systems:

  • Embedding Models: Typically handle the indexing and retrieval of relevant text segments. Fine-tuning these models on domain-specific datasets enables more accurate retrieval of contextually relevant information.
  • Generative Models: Responsible for synthesizing answers from the retrieved information. Fine-tuning these models can enhance their ability to generate coherent and contextually accurate responses.

The paper reports that fine-tuning embedding models notably enhances retrieval accuracy, thereby leading to better performance of the generative model in constructing the final answers.

Iterative Reasoning Enhancements

Beyond model fine-tuning, the incorporation of iterative reasoning mechanisms also plays a crucial role. The paper experiments with an Observe-Orient-Decide-Act (OODA) loop, a framework for continuous information assessment and decision-making. By applying this iterative process, the system adjusts its strategies based on new information and feedback, significantly enhancing the depth and accuracy of its outputs.

Experimental Setup and Results

The experiments compare several configurations:

  • Generic RAG systems,
  • Systems with either the retriever or generator or both fine-tuned, and
  • Systems enhanced with OODA reasoning loops.

The findings are substantial, highlighting that:

  • Fine-tuned retrievers contribute more significantly to system performance than fine-tuned generators.
  • Systems employing OODA reasoning exhibit a marked improvement in generating accurate and contextually appropriate answers, outperforming even fully fine-tuned models.

Implications and Future Research

The implications of these findings suggest practical approaches for improving the performance of question-answering systems in specialized domains like finance. Particularly, the benefits of fine-tuning embedding models and incorporating iterative reasoning mechanisms like OODA are clear.

In future work, the authors suggest exploring:

  • More sophisticated augmentation strategies for information retrieval,
  • The combination of fine-tuned models with iterative reasoning processes, and
  • The development of benchmarks and evaluation metrics for other specialized industrial applications.

Conclusion

This paper underscores the importance of tailored adjustments to both the technical components and the reasoning frameworks of AI systems for domain-specific applications. The successful application of these methodologies to financial question-answering tasks suggests a promising avenue for extending these techniques to other complex, knowledge-intensive domains.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters and Arman Cohan “Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer”, 2020 arXiv:2004.05150 [cs.CL]
  2. John Richard Boyd “Patterns of Conflict”, 1986 URL: http://d-n-i.net/second_level/boyd_military.htm
  3. “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners”, 2020 arXiv:2005.14165 [cs.CL]
  4. “HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data”, 2020 arXiv:2004.07347 [cs.CL]
  5. “Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context”, 2019 arXiv:1901.02860 [cs.LG]
  6. “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding”, 2018 arXiv:1810.04805 [cs.CL]
  7. Robert E. Enck “The OODA Loop” In Home Health Care Management & Practice 24.3, 2012, pp. 123–124 DOI: 10.1177/1084822312439314
  8. “Retrieval-Generation Synergy Augmented Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2310.05149 [cs.CL]
  9. “Prompt-Guided Retrieval Augmentation for Non-Knowledge-Intensive Tasks”, 2023 arXiv:2305.17653 [cs.CL]
  10. “Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP”, 2019 arXiv:1902.00751 [cs.LG]
  11. “RAVEN: In-Context Learning with Retrieval-Augmented Encoder-Decoder Language Models”, 2024 arXiv:2308.07922 [cs.CL]
  12. “FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering”, 2023 arXiv:2311.11944 [cs.CL]
  13. “Active Retrieval Augmented Generation”, 2023 arXiv:2305.06983 [cs.CL]
  14. “Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Small Language Models in Knowledge-Intensive Tasks”, 2023 arXiv:2305.18395 [cs.CL]
  15. “UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System”, 2020 arXiv:2005.00700 [cs.CL]
  16. Yann LeCun “A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence”, 2022 URL: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=BZ5a1r-kVsf
  17. “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks”, 2021 arXiv:2005.11401 [cs.CL]
  18. “RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach”, 2019 arXiv:1907.11692 [cs.CL]
  19. “Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback”, 2023 arXiv:2303.17651 [cs.CL]
  20. “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer”, 2023 arXiv:1910.10683 [cs.LG]
  21. “DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter”, 2020 arXiv:1910.01108 [cs.CL]
  22. “PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change”, 2022 arXiv:2206.10498 [cs.CL]
  23. “Attention Is All You Need”, 2017 arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]
  24. “Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoning”, 2023 arXiv:2305.00633 [cs.CL]
  25. “Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2305.10601 [cs.CL]
  26. “Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2310.07554 [cs.IR]
  27. “Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structures”, 2024 arXiv:2402.03620 [cs.AI]
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Zooey Nguyen (7 papers)
  2. Anthony Annunziata (1 paper)
  3. Vinh Luong (2 papers)
  4. Sang Dinh (6 papers)
  5. Quynh Le (4 papers)
  6. Anh Hai Ha (2 papers)
  7. Chanh Le (1 paper)
  8. Hong An Phan (2 papers)
  9. Shruti Raghavan (4 papers)
  10. Christopher Nguyen (9 papers)
Citations (2)