Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning Deep Dynamical Systems using Stable Neural ODEs (2404.10622v2)

Published 16 Apr 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Learning complex trajectories from demonstrations in robotic tasks has been effectively addressed through the utilization of Dynamical Systems (DS). State-of-the-art DS learning methods ensure stability of the generated trajectories; however, they have three shortcomings: a) the DS is assumed to have a single attractor, which limits the diversity of tasks it can achieve, b) state derivative information is assumed to be available in the learning process and c) the state of the DS is assumed to be measurable at inference time. We propose a class of provably stable latent DS with possibly multiple attractors, that inherit the training methods of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, thus, dropping the dependency on state derivative information. A diffeomorphic mapping for the output and a loss that captures time-invariant trajectory similarity are proposed. We validate the efficacy of our approach through experiments conducted on a public dataset of handwritten shapes and within a simulated object manipulation task.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Sylvain Calinon “Learning from demonstration (programming by demonstration)” In Encyclopedia of robotics Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018, pp. 1–8
  2. “Collaborative interaction models for optimized human-robot teamwork” In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020, pp. 11221–11228 IEEE
  3. “Human-in-the-Loop Optimization of Active Back-Support Exoskeleton Assistance Via Lumbosacral Joint Torque Estimation” In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2023, pp. 6090–6096 IEEE
  4. Stefan Schaal “Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?” In Trends in cognitive sciences 3.6 Elsevier, 1999, pp. 233–242
  5. “Mixture of attractors: A novel movement primitive representation for learning motor skills from demonstrations” In IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3.2 IEEE, 2018, pp. 926–933
  6. S Mohammad Khansari-Zadeh and Aude Billard “Learning stable nonlinear dynamical systems with gaussian mixture models” In IEEE Transactions on Robotics 27.5 IEEE, 2011, pp. 943–957
  7. S Mohammad Khansari-Zadeh and Aude Billard “Learning control Lyapunov function to ensure stability of dynamical system-based robot reaching motions” In Robotics and Autonomous Systems 62.6 Elsevier, 2014, pp. 752–765
  8. “Euclideanizing flows: Diffeomorphic reduction for learning stable dynamical systems” In Learning for Dynamics and Control, 2020, pp. 630–639 PMLR
  9. “Dynamical movement primitives: learning attractor models for motor behaviors” In Neural computation 25.2 MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA journals-info …, 2013, pp. 328–373
  10. J Zico Kolter and Gaurav Manek “Learning stable deep dynamics models” In Advances in neural information processing systems 32, 2019
  11. Klaus Neumann and Jochen J Steil “Learning robot motions with stable dynamical systems under diffeomorphic transformations” In Robotics and Autonomous Systems 70 Elsevier, 2015, pp. 1–15
  12. Jiechao Zhang, Hadi Beik Mohammadi and Leonel Rozo “Learning Riemannian Stable Dynamical Systems via Diffeomorphisms” In 6th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2022
  13. “Neural ordinary differential equations” In Advances in neural information processing systems 31, 2018
  14. “Learning Robust State Observers using Neural ODEs” In Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference, 2023, pp. 208–219 PMLR
  15. Lucas Böttcher, Nino Antulov-Fantulin and Thomas Asikis “AI Pontryagin or how artificial neural networks learn to control dynamical systems” In Nature communications 13.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2022, pp. 333
  16. “Near-optimal control of dynamical systems with neural ordinary differential equations” In Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3.4 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 045004
  17. “Deeppose: Human pose estimation via deep neural networks” In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2014, pp. 1653–1660
  18. Ivan Dario Jimenez Rodriguez, Aaron Ames and Yisong Yue “LyaNet: A Lyapunov framework for training neural ODEs” In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2022, pp. 18687–18703 PMLR
  19. Spencer M Richards, Felix Berkenkamp and Andreas Krause “The lyapunov neural network: Adaptive stability certification for safe learning of dynamical systems” In Conference on Robot Learning, 2018, pp. 466–476 PMLR
  20. Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein and Samy Bengio “Density estimation using real nvp” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.08803, 2016
  21. “Using the averaged Hausdorff distance as a performance measure in evolutionary multiobjective optimization” In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 16.4 IEEE, 2012, pp. 504–522
  22. Patrick Kidger “On neural differential equations” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02435, 2022
  23. “robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learning” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.12293, 2020
  24. “What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03298, 2021
  25. “Roboturk: A crowdsourcing platform for robotic skill learning through imitation” In Conference on Robot Learning, 2018, pp. 879–893 PMLR
  26. Bibit Bianchini, Mathew Halm and Michael Posa “Simultaneous Learning of Contact and Continuous Dynamics” In Conference on Robot Learning, 2023, pp. 3966–3978 PMLR
  27. Daniel E Koditschek and Elon Rimon “Robot navigation functions on manifolds with boundary” In Advances in applied mathematics 11.4 Elsevier, 1990, pp. 412–442
  28. Jorge Cortes “Discontinuous dynamical systems” In IEEE Control Systems Magazine 28.3, 2008, pp. 36–73 DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2008.919306

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel StableNODE framework that guarantees Lyapunov stability for latent dynamical systems with multiple attractors.
  • The approach uses a corrective signal and diffeomorphic mappings to overcome state derivative limitations in learning from demonstrations.
  • Experimental results demonstrate enhanced trajectory learning and precise manipulation compared to traditional dynamical systems methods.

Provably Stable Latent Dynamical Systems with Multiple Attractors for Learning Robotic Tasks

Introduction to Latent Dynamical Systems in Robotics

Learning from demonstrations (LfD) has emerged as a powerful methodology enabling robots to acquire and execute complex behaviors by observing and imitating expert demonstrations, thereby bridging the gap between human expertise and robotic capabilities. This approach is pivotal for tasks requiring intricate motion patterns, smoothness, and stability—qualities that are challenging to encode in models directly. Among different frameworks for encoding such traits, Dynamical Systems (DS) stand out due to their robustness, flexibility, and the innate capability to ensure stability and smoothness. Despite these advantages, traditional DS learning frameworks are not without limitations, notably assuming a singular attractor, reliance on state derivative information, and measurability of the system's state during inference, which restricts their applicability and complicates the learning process.

Advancements in Neural ODEs and Stability

This paper introduces a class of provably stable latent DS that leverages the underlying principles of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) but significantly extends their utility by enabling the learning of DS with multiple attractors and without the necessity for state derivative information. This development is particularly advantageous in applications where such information is cumbersome or impossible to obtain directly. By incorporating a novel corrective signal into the latent dynamics, the framework ensures the stability of the learned system across the entire phase space. Additionally, it proposes a diffeomorphic mapping for the output space and a loss function capturing time-invariant trajectory similarity, facilitating the learning process from demonstrations.

Theoretical Foundations and Model Implementation

At the core of the proposed Stable Neural ODEs (StableNODEs) is a learning framework that guarantees Lyapunov stability, even in the presence of multiple attractors. This is achieved by a corrective signal that adjusts the nominal dynamics based on a candidate Lyapunov function's behavior, ensuring that the system's trajectories remain bounded and converge asymptotically to the designated attractors set. Moreover, the framework utilizes diffeomorphic mappings in the output space, enabling a direct and meaningful specification of attractors in terms of the task at hand, an aspect critical for tasks involving precise goal-directed behaviors.

Experimental Validation and Implications

The paper validates the proposed StableNODE framework through extensive experiments on a publicly available dataset of handwritten shapes and a simulated object manipulation task, demonstrating superior performance in trajectory learning when compared to existing DS learning methods. These results highlight the potential of StableNODEs in capturing complex behaviors and facilitating robotic learning in varying contexts, from imitating human motion to executing precise manipulation tasks with undefined object positions.

Future Directions in Robotics and AI

The implications of this research extend beyond the immediate task of learning from demonstrations, opening avenues for developing robotic systems capable of understanding and replicating human-like intricate movements in a stable and predictable manner. The flexibility and robustness of the proposed learning paradigm hold promise for a wide array of applications within robotics and potentially other domains where learning complex spatial and temporal patterns is crucial. Future work could explore minimizing unwanted critical points in Lyapunov functions and extending the framework to learn discontinuous DS, further broadening the scope of tasks that robots can learn and perform reliably.

In sum, this paper offers significant contributions towards making robots more adaptable, capable, and safe in performing tasks that require complex motion patterns, laying a foundation for future advancements in robotics and LfD.