Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tree Splitting Based Rounding Scheme for Weighted Proportional Allocations with Subsidy (2404.07707v1)

Published 11 Apr 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible items to a set of $n$ heterogeneous agents, aiming at computing a proportional allocation by introducing subsidy (money). It has been shown by Wu et al. (WINE 2023) that when agents are unweighted a total subsidy of $n/4$ suffices (assuming that each item has value/cost at most $1$ to every agent) to ensure proportionality. When agents have general weights, they proposed an algorithm that guarantees a weighted proportional allocation requiring a total subsidy of $(n-1)/2$, by rounding the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. In this work, we revisit the problem and the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. We show that by formulating the fractional allocation returned by the algorithm as a directed tree connecting the agents and splitting the tree into canonical components, there is a rounding scheme that requires a total subsidy of at most $n/3 - 1/6$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Fair division of indivisible goods: Recent progress and open questions. Artif. Intell., 322:103965, 2023.
  2. H. Aziz. Achieving envy-freeness and equitability with monetary transfers. In AAAI, pages 5102–5109. AAAI Press, 2021.
  3. Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., 36(1):3, 2022.
  4. Weighted maxmin fair share allocation of indivisible chores. In IJCAI, pages 46–52. ijcai.org, 2019.
  5. Algorithmic fair allocation of indivisible items: a survey and new questions. SIGecom Exch., 20(1):24–40, 2022.
  6. Approximate and strategyproof maximin share allocation of chores with ordinal preferences. Mathematical Programming, pages 1–27, 2022.
  7. A polynomial-time algorithm for computing a pareto optimal and almost proportional allocation. Oper. Res. Lett., 48(5):573–578, 2020.
  8. Algorithms for max-min share fair allocation of indivisible chores. In AAAI, pages 335–341. AAAI Press, 2017.
  9. Fair-share allocations for agents with arbitrary entitlements. In EC, page 127. ACM, 2021.
  10. Achieving envy-freeness with limited subsidies under dichotomous valuations. In IJCAI, pages 60–66. ijcai.org, 2022.
  11. S. Barman and S. K. Krishnamurthy. On the proximity of markets with integral equilibria. In AAAI, pages 1748–1755, 2019.
  12. S. Barman and S. K. Krishnamurthy. Approximation algorithms for maximin fair division. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 8(1):5:1–5:28, 2020.
  13. Fair division of mixed divisible and indivisible goods. Artif. Intell., 293:103436, 2021.
  14. On approximate envy-freeness for indivisible chores and mixed resources. In APPROX-RANDOM, volume 207 of LIPIcs, pages 1:1–1:23. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021.
  15. S. Bouveret and M. Lemaître. Characterizing conflicts in fair division of indivisible goods using a scale of criteria. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., 30(2):259–290, 2016.
  16. S. Brânzei and F. Sandomirskiy. Algorithms for competitive division of chores. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2023.
  17. One dollar each eliminates envy. In EC, pages 23–39. ACM, 2020.
  18. E. Budish. The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. In BQGT, page 74:1. ACM, 2010.
  19. The unreasonable fairness of maximum nash welfare. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 7(3):12:1–12:32, 2019.
  20. Weighted envy-freeness in indivisible item allocation. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 9(3):18:1–18:39, 2021.
  21. Improving EFX guarantees through rainbow cycle number. In EC, pages 310–311. ACM, 2021.
  22. Fair public decision making. In EC, 2017.
  23. Fair allocation of indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 64:1–20, 2019.
  24. U. Feige and X. Huang. On picking sequences for chores. In EC, pages 626–655. ACM, 2023.
  25. A tight negative example for MMS fair allocations. In WINE, volume 13112 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 355–372. Springer, 2021.
  26. D. Foley. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Economic Essays, pages 45–98, 1967.
  27. Unified fair allocation of goods and chores via copies. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 11(3-4):1–27, 2023.
  28. A fair and truthful mechanism with limited subsidy. Games and Economic Behavior, 144:49–70, 2024.
  29. D. Halpern and N. Shah. Fair division with subsidy. In SAGT, volume 11801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 374–389. Springer, 2019.
  30. X. Huang and P. Lu. An algorithmic framework for approximating maximin share allocation of chores. In EC, pages 630–631. ACM, 2021.
  31. X. Huang and E. Segal-Halevi. A reduction from chores allocation to job scheduling. In EC, page 908. ACM, 2023.
  32. Towards optimal subsidy bounds for envy-freeable allocations. In AAAI, pages 9824–9831. AAAI Press, 2024.
  33. Almost (weighted) proportional allocations for indivisible chores. In WWW, pages 122–131. ACM, 2022.
  34. Truthful fair mechanisms for allocating mixed divisible and indivisible goods. In IJCAI, pages 2808–2816. ijcai.org, 2023.
  35. On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In EC, pages 125–131. ACM, 2004.
  36. Mixed fair division: A survey. CoRR, abs/2306.09564, 2023.
  37. E. S. Maskin. On the fair allocation of indivisible goods. In Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, pages 341–349. Springer, 1987.
  38. H. Moulin. Fair division in the age of internet. Annu. Rev. Econ., 2018.
  39. Almost envy-free allocations of indivisible goods or chores with entitlements. In AAAI, pages 9901–9908. AAAI Press, 2024.
  40. H. Steihaus. The problem of fair division. Econometrica, 16:101–104, 1948.
  41. On the existence of EFX (and pareto-optimal) allocations for binary chores. CoRR, abs/2308.12177, 2023.
  42. One quarter each (on average) ensures proportionality. In International Conference on Web and Internet Economics, pages 582–599. Springer, 2023.
  43. Weighted EF1 allocations for indivisible chores. In EC, page 1155. ACM, 2023.
  44. S. Zhou and X. Wu. Approximately EFX allocations for indivisible chores. Artif. Intell., 326:104037, 2024.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com