Tree Splitting Based Rounding Scheme for Weighted Proportional Allocations with Subsidy (2404.07707v1)
Abstract: We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible items to a set of $n$ heterogeneous agents, aiming at computing a proportional allocation by introducing subsidy (money). It has been shown by Wu et al. (WINE 2023) that when agents are unweighted a total subsidy of $n/4$ suffices (assuming that each item has value/cost at most $1$ to every agent) to ensure proportionality. When agents have general weights, they proposed an algorithm that guarantees a weighted proportional allocation requiring a total subsidy of $(n-1)/2$, by rounding the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. In this work, we revisit the problem and the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. We show that by formulating the fractional allocation returned by the algorithm as a directed tree connecting the agents and splitting the tree into canonical components, there is a rounding scheme that requires a total subsidy of at most $n/3 - 1/6$.
- Fair division of indivisible goods: Recent progress and open questions. Artif. Intell., 322:103965, 2023.
- H. Aziz. Achieving envy-freeness and equitability with monetary transfers. In AAAI, pages 5102–5109. AAAI Press, 2021.
- Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., 36(1):3, 2022.
- Weighted maxmin fair share allocation of indivisible chores. In IJCAI, pages 46–52. ijcai.org, 2019.
- Algorithmic fair allocation of indivisible items: a survey and new questions. SIGecom Exch., 20(1):24–40, 2022.
- Approximate and strategyproof maximin share allocation of chores with ordinal preferences. Mathematical Programming, pages 1–27, 2022.
- A polynomial-time algorithm for computing a pareto optimal and almost proportional allocation. Oper. Res. Lett., 48(5):573–578, 2020.
- Algorithms for max-min share fair allocation of indivisible chores. In AAAI, pages 335–341. AAAI Press, 2017.
- Fair-share allocations for agents with arbitrary entitlements. In EC, page 127. ACM, 2021.
- Achieving envy-freeness with limited subsidies under dichotomous valuations. In IJCAI, pages 60–66. ijcai.org, 2022.
- S. Barman and S. K. Krishnamurthy. On the proximity of markets with integral equilibria. In AAAI, pages 1748–1755, 2019.
- S. Barman and S. K. Krishnamurthy. Approximation algorithms for maximin fair division. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 8(1):5:1–5:28, 2020.
- Fair division of mixed divisible and indivisible goods. Artif. Intell., 293:103436, 2021.
- On approximate envy-freeness for indivisible chores and mixed resources. In APPROX-RANDOM, volume 207 of LIPIcs, pages 1:1–1:23. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021.
- S. Bouveret and M. Lemaître. Characterizing conflicts in fair division of indivisible goods using a scale of criteria. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., 30(2):259–290, 2016.
- S. Brânzei and F. Sandomirskiy. Algorithms for competitive division of chores. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2023.
- One dollar each eliminates envy. In EC, pages 23–39. ACM, 2020.
- E. Budish. The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. In BQGT, page 74:1. ACM, 2010.
- The unreasonable fairness of maximum nash welfare. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 7(3):12:1–12:32, 2019.
- Weighted envy-freeness in indivisible item allocation. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 9(3):18:1–18:39, 2021.
- Improving EFX guarantees through rainbow cycle number. In EC, pages 310–311. ACM, 2021.
- Fair public decision making. In EC, 2017.
- Fair allocation of indivisible goods to asymmetric agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 64:1–20, 2019.
- U. Feige and X. Huang. On picking sequences for chores. In EC, pages 626–655. ACM, 2023.
- A tight negative example for MMS fair allocations. In WINE, volume 13112 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 355–372. Springer, 2021.
- D. Foley. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Economic Essays, pages 45–98, 1967.
- Unified fair allocation of goods and chores via copies. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 11(3-4):1–27, 2023.
- A fair and truthful mechanism with limited subsidy. Games and Economic Behavior, 144:49–70, 2024.
- D. Halpern and N. Shah. Fair division with subsidy. In SAGT, volume 11801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 374–389. Springer, 2019.
- X. Huang and P. Lu. An algorithmic framework for approximating maximin share allocation of chores. In EC, pages 630–631. ACM, 2021.
- X. Huang and E. Segal-Halevi. A reduction from chores allocation to job scheduling. In EC, page 908. ACM, 2023.
- Towards optimal subsidy bounds for envy-freeable allocations. In AAAI, pages 9824–9831. AAAI Press, 2024.
- Almost (weighted) proportional allocations for indivisible chores. In WWW, pages 122–131. ACM, 2022.
- Truthful fair mechanisms for allocating mixed divisible and indivisible goods. In IJCAI, pages 2808–2816. ijcai.org, 2023.
- On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In EC, pages 125–131. ACM, 2004.
- Mixed fair division: A survey. CoRR, abs/2306.09564, 2023.
- E. S. Maskin. On the fair allocation of indivisible goods. In Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, pages 341–349. Springer, 1987.
- H. Moulin. Fair division in the age of internet. Annu. Rev. Econ., 2018.
- Almost envy-free allocations of indivisible goods or chores with entitlements. In AAAI, pages 9901–9908. AAAI Press, 2024.
- H. Steihaus. The problem of fair division. Econometrica, 16:101–104, 1948.
- On the existence of EFX (and pareto-optimal) allocations for binary chores. CoRR, abs/2308.12177, 2023.
- One quarter each (on average) ensures proportionality. In International Conference on Web and Internet Economics, pages 582–599. Springer, 2023.
- Weighted EF1 allocations for indivisible chores. In EC, page 1155. ACM, 2023.
- S. Zhou and X. Wu. Approximately EFX allocations for indivisible chores. Artif. Intell., 326:104037, 2024.