Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Continuous-variable quantum key distribution with noisy squeezed states (2404.05247v2)

Published 8 Apr 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: We address the role of noisy squeezing in security and performance of continuous-variable (CV) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols. Squeezing has long been recognized for its numerous advantages in CV QKD, such as enhanced robustness against channel noise and loss, and improved secret key rates. However, the noise of the squeezed states, that unavoidably originates already from optical loss in the source, raises concerns about its potential exploitation by an eavesdropper. This is particularly relevant if this noise is pessimistically assumed untrusted. We address the allocation of untrusted noise within a squeezed state and show that anti-squeezing noise is typically more harmful for security of the protocols, as it potentially provides more information to an eavesdropper. Although the anti-squeezing noise may not directly contribute to the generated key data, it is involved in parameter estimation and can in fact be harmful even if considered trusted. Our study covers the effects of anti-squeezing noise in both the asymptotic and finite-size regimes. We highlight the positive effects and limitations of imposing trust assumption on anti-squeezing noise. Additionally, we emphasize the detrimental impact of untrusted noise in both fiber and free-space fading links. Our findings offer essential insights for practical implementations and optimization of squeezed-state CV QKD protocols in realistic scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):145, 2002.
  2. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(3):1301–1350, sep 2009.
  3. Practical challenges in quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information, 2:16025, 2016.
  4. Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92(2):025002, 2020.
  5. Advances in quantum cryptography. Advances in Optics and Photonics, 12(4):1012–1236, 2020.
  6. Quantum information with continuous variables. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(2):513, 2005.
  7. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Physical review letters, 88(5):057902, 2002.
  8. Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states. Nature, 421(6920):238–241, 2003.
  9. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nature photonics, 7(5):378–381, 2013.
  10. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 202.81 km of fiber. Physical review letters, 125(1):010502, 2020.
  11. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 100 km fiber with local local oscillator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08156, 2023.
  12. Finite-size analysis of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A, 81:062343, Jun 2010.
  13. Anthony Leverrier. Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution via a gaussian de finetti reduction. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:200501, May 2017.
  14. Quantum distribution of gaussian keys using squeezed states. Phys. Rev. A, 63:052311, Apr 2001.
  15. Alexander I Lvovsky. Squeezed light. Photonics: Scientific Foundations, Technology and Applications, 1:121–163, 2015.
  16. Continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:130501, Mar 2009.
  17. Continuous variable quantum key distribution with modulated entangled states. Nat Commun, 3, Aug 2012.
  18. Squeezed-state quantum key distribution upon imperfect reconciliation. New Journal of Physics, 13(11):113007, nov 2011.
  19. Complete elimination of information leakage in continuous-variable quantum communication channels. npj Quantum Information, 4(1):1–6, 2018.
  20. Entanglement of gaussian states and the applicability to quantum key distribution over fading channels. New Journal of Physics, 14(9):093048, 2012.
  21. Squeezing-enhanced quantum key distribution over atmospheric channels. New Journal of Physics, 22(5):053006, may 2020.
  22. Applicability of squeezed- and coherent-state continuous-variable quantum key distribution over satellite links. Entropy, 23(1), 2021.
  23. Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency. Physical review letters, 117(11):110801, 2016.
  24. Chip-based squeezing at a telecom wavelength. Photonics Research, 7(7):A36–A39, July 2019.
  25. Dependence of the squeezing and anti-squeezing factors of bright squeezed light on the seed beam power and pump beam noise. Optics Letters, 44(7):1789–1792, April 2019.
  26. Continuous-wave 6-dB-squeezed light with 2.5-THz-bandwidth from single-mode PPLN waveguide. APL Photonics, 5(3):036104, March 2020.
  27. Quantum limits on the capacity of multispan links with phase-sensitive amplification. Journal of Lightwave Technology, pages 1–9, 2023.
  28. Implementation of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with composable and one-sided-device-independent security against coherent attacks. Nature communications, 6(1):1–7, 2015.
  29. Gaussian quantum information. Reviews of Modern Physics, 84(2):621, 2012.
  30. Preventing side-channel effects in continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Physical Review A, 93(3):032309, 2016.
  31. Evaluating capacities of bosonic gaussian channels. Phys. Rev. A, 63:032312, Feb 2001.
  32. Optimality of gaussian attacks in continuous-variable quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:190502, Nov 2006.
  33. Unconditional optimality of gaussian attacks against continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:190503, Nov 2006.
  34. Quantifying decoherence in continuous variable systems. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 7(4):R19–R36, feb 2005.
  35. Frédéric Grosshans. Collective attacks and unconditional security in continuous variable quantum keydistribution. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:020504, Jan 2005.
  36. Trusted noise in continuous-variable quantum key distribution: A threat and a defense. Entropy, 18(1), 2016.
  37. Multiedge-type low-density parity-check codes for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Physical Review A, 103(6):062419, 2021.
  38. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution with efficient channel estimation. Phys. Rev. A, 90:062310, Dec 2014.
  39. Anthony Leverrier. Composable security proof for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with coherent states. Physical review letters, 114(7):070501, 2015.
  40. Continuous-variable entanglement distillation of non-gaussian mixed states. Physical Review A, 82(1):012312, 2010.
  41. Extremality of gaussian quantum states. Physical review letters, 96(8):080502, 2006.
  42. Atmospheric quantum channels with weak and strong turbulence. Physical review letters, 117(9):090501, 2016.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 1 like.