Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PerOS: Personalized Self-Adapting Operating Systems in the Cloud (2404.00057v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CR, and cs.OS
PerOS: Personalized Self-Adapting Operating Systems in the Cloud

Abstract: Operating systems (OSes) are foundational to computer systems, managing hardware resources and ensuring secure environments for diverse applications. However, despite their enduring importance, the fundamental design objectives of OSes have seen minimal evolution over decades. Traditionally prioritizing aspects like speed, memory efficiency, security, and scalability, these objectives often overlook the crucial aspect of intelligence as well as personalized user experience. The lack of intelligence becomes increasingly critical amid technological revolutions, such as the remarkable advancements in ML. Today's personal devices, evolving into intimate companions for users, pose unique challenges for traditional OSes like Linux and iOS, especially with the emergence of specialized hardware featuring heterogeneous components. Furthermore, the rise of LLMs in ML has introduced transformative capabilities, reshaping user interactions and software development paradigms. While existing literature predominantly focuses on leveraging ML methods for system optimization or accelerating ML workloads, there is a significant gap in addressing personalized user experiences at the OS level. To tackle this challenge, this work proposes PerOS, a personalized OS ingrained with LLM capabilities. PerOS aims to provide tailored user experiences while safeguarding privacy and personal data through declarative interfaces, self-adaptive kernels, and secure data management in a scalable cloud-centric architecture; therein lies the main research question of this work: How can we develop intelligent, secure, and scalable OSes that deliver personalized experiences to thousands of users?

PerOS: Personalized OSes in the Cloud with Machine Learning

Overview

PerOS proposes a next-generation operating system (OS) that infuses ML—particularly LLMs—to offer users a highly personalized computing experience. Unlike conventional OSes focusing primarily on performance and security, PerOS emphasizes the value of intelligent, adaptive, and personalized user interactions.

Declarative User Interface

The Current Landscape

Traditional user interfaces have evolved from command-line interactions to graphical and touch interfaces. While these developments enhanced accessibility, they also introduced a rigidity that forces users to think like developers.

The Promise of PerOS

PerOS leverages LLMs to move beyond static UIs, introducing a dynamic, voice-activated, or text-based interface that can interpret user commands in natural language. For instance, imagine asking your OS to "undo the most recent commit, remove all CSV files larger than 10 MB, and push the changes to GitHub." This is more intuitive than a sequence of shell commands and makes the OS easier to navigate, even for novice users.

Key Challenges and Methods

  1. Data Collection: Training requires a comprehensive dataset comprising user requests and correct responses.
  2. Conciseness and Consistency: Ensuring LLMs provide concise and consistent answers.
  3. Integration with Kernel: Efficient interaction between LLM-generated commands and kernel operations.

The paper suggests a layered approach, starting with text-based interactions and gradually expanding to multi-modal interactions like voice and images. The results aim to provide a smoother and more intuitive experience, potentially reducing user frustration with traditional command-line interfaces.

Adaptive Kernel and Subsystems

The Current Landscape

Modern OS kernels like Linux are designed to be general-purpose and face challenges tuning themselves to match evolving hardware and user needs effectively.

The Promise of PerOS

PerOS proposes an adaptive kernel that configures and tunes itself according to users' patterns. This dynamically adaptive nature promises more efficient resource usage, such as better memory management, optimized scheduling, and improved storage efficiency.

Key Areas of Focus

  1. Configurations and Tuning:
    • Adaptive CPU timings and memory allocations.
  2. System Policies:
    • Algorithms for memory allocation, CPU scheduling, and cache management.
  3. System functionalities:
    • Learning memory translation and data block indexing for efficient file handling.

Key Challenges and Methods

  1. Performance and Latency: Ensuring the ML models don't introduce latency to kernel operations.
  2. Model Integration: Complexity in embedding ML models within kernel subsystems.
  3. Evaluation Metrics: Establishing appropriate benchmarks and baselines for adaptive kernel performance.

The paper narrows its focus to storage and filesystem configurations, aiming to dynamically adjust based on user patterns, which can lead to more efficient disk use and faster data retrieval times.

Secure and Scalable Architecture in the Cloud

The Current Landscape

Most ML-powered systems face hurdles related to scalability and data privacy, especially when implemented in a cloud environment.

The Promise of PerOS

PerOS utilizes thin-client computing (TCC), serverless models, and privacy-preserving ML (PPML) to achieve both scalability and security.

  1. Thin-Client Computing: Leveraging centralized computing resources hosted in the cloud, making high computational power accessible through lightweight client devices.
  2. Serverless Computing: Utilizing serverless architecture for efficient resource management and cost savings.
  3. Privacy-Preserving ML: Employing cryptography and secure computation methods to protect personal data.

Key Challenges and Methods

  1. Data Privacy and Security: Ensuring robust encryption and stringent access control.
  2. Performance and Latency: Managing the latency introduced by cloud-based computation.
  3. Engineering Complexity: Seamlessly integrating TCC, serverless, and PPML requires significant engineering efforts.

The architecture accommodates scalability to manage usage spikes and supports sharing resources among trusted groups, thus optimizing costs and improving energy efficiency in cloud environments.

Future Implications and Speculation

PerOS potentially marks a significant step towards more intelligent, adaptive, and user-friendly computing. If successful, it can alter how users interact with their devices, making OSes more intuitive and tailored to individual needs. Moreover, its design principles could influence future developments in other tech domains, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and Internet of Things (IoT).

However, challenges remain, including ensuring real-time performance, addressing sophisticated security threats, and balancing the cost of deployment against the benefits. Future research could focus on extending PerOS's capabilities to multi-modal interactions, real-time adaptive frameworks, and broader security models, aligning with ongoing advancements in network technologies and computational models.

In conclusion, PerOS represents a progressive approach to OS design, wherein ML and cloud technologies converge to create an intelligent, adaptive user experience. It stands as a testament to how AI can be interwoven into our daily tools, enhancing our interactions and making technology more responsive and personalized.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (103)
  1. G. AG. Openvas - open vulnerability assessment scanner. https://www.openvas.org/, 2023.
  2. Firecracker: Lightweight virtualization for serverless applications. In Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2020. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211567076.
  3. High-definition routing congestion prediction for large-scale fpgas. 2020 25th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), pages 26–31, 2020. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:214692445.
  4. Reducing power consumption of mobile thin client devices. 2009. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:37738031.
  5. R. S. Amant and L. Zettlemoyer. User interface softbots. In AAAI/IAAI, 2000. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5413725.
  6. Low-power, high-performance analog neural branch prediction. 2008 41st IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 447–458, 2008. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14553490.
  7. Amazon. Amazon mechanical turk. https://www.mturk.com, 2023.
  8. AMD. Adaptive soc for any application from cloud to edge. https://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/acap/versal.html, 2023.
  9. Apple. Apple unveils m3, m3 pro, and m3 max, the most advanced chips for a personal computer. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/10/apple-unveils-m3-m3-pro-and-m3-max-the-most-advanced-chips-for-a-personal-computer/, 2023.
  10. Energy-aware resource scheduling for serverless edge computing. 2022 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGrid), pages 190–199, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:250715298.
  11. J. Axboe. Flexible i/o tester. https://github.com/axboe/fio, 2023.
  12. N. Bansal and M. Harchol-Balter. Analysis of srpt scheduling: investigating unfairness. In Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, 2001. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6418437.
  13. Cypress: input size-sensitive container provisioning and request scheduling for serverless platforms. Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Cloud Computing, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253385775.
  14. Packet routing in dynamically changing networks: A reinforcement learning approach. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 1993. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:364332.
  15. Netherite: Efficient execution of serverless workflows. Proc. VLDB Endow., 15:1591–1604, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:249916915.
  16. Evidence-based static branch prediction using machine learning. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 19:188–222, 1997. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8865665.
  17. Quality of experience in remote virtual desktop services. 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2013), pages 1352–1357, 2013. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:10213123.
  18. Intelligent interfaces through interactive planners. Interact. Comput., 12:545–564, 2000. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5527993.
  19. Building accountability into the internet of things: the iot databox model. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, 4:39–55, 2018.
  20. Fast and accurate estimation of quality of results in high-level synthesis with machine learning. 2018 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM), pages 129–132, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5078393.
  21. Thin client computing solutions in low-and high-motion scenarios. In International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS’07), pages 38–38. IEEE, 2007.
  22. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. ArXiv, abs/2305.14314, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258841328.
  23. A q-learning based self-adaptive i/o communication for 2.5d integrated many-core microprocessor and memory. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65:1185–1196, 2016. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:30396137.
  24. A circuit-architecture co-optimization framework for exploring nonvolatile memory hierarchies. ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO), 10:1 – 22, 2013. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:624945.
  25. O. Etzioni and D. S. Weld. A softbot-based interface to the internet. Commun. ACM, 37:72–76, 1994. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2447472.
  26. Os agents: Using ai techniques in the operating system environment. 1993. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11991416.
  27. Operating system scheduling on heterogeneous core systems. 2007. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14823905.
  28. Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling in nocs with supervised and reinforcement learning techniques. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 68:375–389, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52840323.
  29. An open-source benchmark suite for microservices and their hardware-software implications for cloud & edge systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 3–18, 2019.
  30. Horizon: Facebook’s open source applied reinforcement learning platform. ArXiv, abs/1811.00260, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53204036.
  31. Google. Write your application as a modular binary. deploy it as a set of microservices. https://serviceweaver.dev, 2023.
  32. H. Hè. In-vitro serverless clusters.
  33. G. Heiser. The sel4 microkernel–an introduction. The seL4 Foundation, 1, 2020.
  34. F. Hublet. The databank model. Master’s thesis, ETH Zurich, 2021.
  35. Energy-efficient application resource scheduling using machine learning classifiers. Proceedings of the 47th International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:195348382.
  36. A. A. T. Isstaif and R. Mortier. Towards latency-aware linux scheduling for serverless workloads. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on SErverless Systems, Applications and MEthodologies, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258486714.
  37. Towards more intelligent and interactive interfaces. In The Florida AI Research Society, 1999. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13371719.
  38. D. A. Jiménez and C. Lin. Dynamic branch prediction with perceptrons. Proceedings HPCA Seventh International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, pages 197–206, 2001. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3184222.
  39. Learning-based application-agnostic 3d noc design for heterogeneous manycore systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 68:852–866, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53046469.
  40. D.-C. Juan and D. Marculescu. Power-aware performance increase via core/uncore reinforcement control for chip-multiprocessors. In International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2012. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15136374.
  41. Hermod: principled and practical scheduling for serverless functions. Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Cloud Computing, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253385680.
  42. Communication-efficient graph neural networks with probabilistic neighborhood expansion analysis and caching. ArXiv, abs/2305.03152, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258546707.
  43. Cascadexml: Rethinking transformers for end-to-end multi-resolution training in extreme multi-label classification. ArXiv, abs/2211.00640, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253255408.
  44. J. Kim and K. Lee. Practical cloud workloads for serverless faas. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pages 477–477, 2019.
  45. The case for learned index structures. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data, 2017. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6038777.
  46. Tab2know: Building a knowledge base from tables in scientific papers. In International Workshop on the Semantic Web, 2020a. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226229411.
  47. Tab2know: Building a knowledge base from tables in scientific papers. In The Semantic Web–ISWC 2020: 19th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Greece, November 2–6, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 19, pages 349–365. Springer, 2020b.
  48. Kubernetes. Production-grade container orchestration. https://kubernetes.io, 2023.
  49. Thin-client computing for supporting the qos of streaming media in mobile devices. In Communication Systems and Applications, 2006. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:394966.
  50. Muse: Secure inference resilient to malicious clients. In IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2021. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232216360.
  51. On learning-based methods for design-space exploration with high-level synthesis. 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), pages 1–7, 2013. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12059048.
  52. G. Lyon. Nmap: the network mapper - free security scanner. https://nmap.org/, 2023.
  53. Comparison of two ict solutions: desktop pc versus thin client computing. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18:861–871, 2013.
  54. Remote access protocols for desktop-as-a-service solutions. PLoS ONE, 14, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:58022821.
  55. Orion and the three rights: Sizing, bundling, and prewarming for serverless dags. In USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2022a. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252819711.
  56. Wisefuse: Workload characterization and dag transformation for serverless workflows. Abstract Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGMETRICS/IFIP PERFORMANCE Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, 2022b. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:249282028.
  57. N. Mahmoudi and H. Khazaei. Performance modeling of serverless computing platforms. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 10:2834–2847, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226587161.
  58. Microsoft. Discover the power of ai with copilot in windows. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/copilot-ai-features, 2023.
  59. P. Mohassel and Y. Zhang. Secureml: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 19–38, 2017. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11605311.
  60. H. Moore. Metasploit. https://www.metasploit.com/, 2023.
  61. Ray: A distributed framework for emerging {{\{{AI}}\}} applications. In 13th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 18), pages 561–577, 2018.
  62. A comparison of thin-client computing architectures. 2000.
  63. OpenAI. Gpt-4 turbo. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8555510-gpt-4-turbo, 2023.
  64. Late breaking results: An efficient learning-based approach for performance exploration on analog and rf circuit synthesis. 2019 56th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), pages 1–2, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:163164981.
  65. Valorising the iot databox: creating value for everyone. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 28(1):e3125, 2017.
  66. R. P. A. Petrick. Planning for desktop services. 2007. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55963917.
  67. Stateful serverless computing with crucial. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 31:1 – 38, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247300542.
  68. Neuro-noc: Energy optimization in heterogeneous many-core noc using neural networks in dark silicon era. 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pages 1–5, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53084745.
  69. Serverless workflows for containerised applications in the cloud continuum. Journal of Grid Computing, 19, 2021. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235901547.
  70. Icebreaker: warming serverless functions better with heterogeneity. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247026551.
  71. Improving the qoe of citrix thin client users. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 1–6, 2010. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1769656.
  72. The interactive performance of slim: a stateless, thin-client architecture. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 33(5):32–47, 1999.
  73. Serverless in the wild: Characterizing and optimizing the serverless workload at a large cloud provider. ArXiv, abs/2003.03423, 2020. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212633767.
  74. Learning execution through neural code fusion. ArXiv, abs/1906.07181, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:189999405.
  75. Fireworks: a fast, efficient, and safe serverless framework using vm-level post-jit snapshot. Proceedings of the Seventeenth European Conference on Computer Systems, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247765574.
  76. Prebaking functions to warm the serverless cold start. Proceedings of the 21st International Middleware Conference, 2020. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:228085887.
  77. Optimized mobile thin clients through a mpeg-4 bifs semantic remote display framework. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 61:447–470, 2011. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2181477.
  78. Dbos: A dbms-oriented operating system. Proc. VLDB Endow., 15:21–30, 2021. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:245827586.
  79. H. Song. Sumpy: A fuzzy software agent. 2007. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1371386.
  80. SpaceX. Starlink. https://www.starlink.com/, 2023.
  81. Parallel virtualized memory translation with nested elastic cuckoo page tables. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246472365.
  82. Leaftl: A learning-based flash translation layer for solid-state drives. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 2, pages 442–456, 2023.
  83. Statistical user behavior detection and qoe evaluation for thin client services. Computer Science and Information Systems, 12(2):587–605, 2015.
  84. Minix 3: status report and current research. login: The USENIX Magazine, 2010.
  85. Distributed task scheduling in serverless edge computing networks for the internet of things: A learning approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9:19634–19648, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248188338.
  86. V. Tarasov. Filebench – a model based file system workload generator, 2018.
  87. I. Tenable. Nessus vulnerability scanner: Network security solution. https://www.tenable.com/products/nessus, 2023.
  88. Elf: An extensive, lightweight and flexible research platform for real-time strategy games. ArXiv, abs/1707.01067, 2017. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1160900.
  89. Benchmarking, analysis, and optimization of serverless function snapshots. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2021. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:231699170.
  90. Accurate operation delay prediction for fpga hls using graph neural networks. 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD), pages 1–9, 2020. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:221727103.
  91. D. Vengerov. A reinforcement learning framework for utility-based scheduling in resource-constrained systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 25:728–736, 2009. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12769472.
  92. Flint: A platform for federated learning integration. ArXiv, abs/2302.12862, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257220077.
  93. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. ArXiv, abs/2203.11171, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247595263.
  94. Piranha: A gpu platform for secure computation. In IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:250361679.
  95. T. Weibel. Smart-umass trace repository. https://traces.cs.umass.edu/index.php/Storage/Storage, 2013.
  96. Sol: safe on-node learning in cloud platforms. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246275770.
  97. S. Whiteson and P. Stone. Corrected version : See errata section adaptive job routing and scheduling. 2005. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9636537.
  98. Providing occupancy as a service with databox. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Smart Cities and Fog Computing, pages 29–34, 2018.
  99. The performance of remote display mechanisms for thin-client computing. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track, pages 131–146, 2002.
  100. Characterizing serverless platforms with serverlessbench. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SoCC ’20. Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3419111.3421280. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3419111.3421280.
  101. Learning driven parallelization for large-scale video workload in hybrid cpu-gpu cluster. Proceedings of the 47th International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:195348830.
  102. Sinan: Ml-based and qos-aware resource management for cloud microservices. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2021. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232118940.
  103. Aquatope: Qos-and-uncertainty-aware resource management for multi-stage serverless workflows. Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 1, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:254927697.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (1)
  1. Hongyu Hè (4 papers)
Citations (1)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com