Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Hey, Teacher, (Don't) Leave Those Kids Alone: Standardizing HRI Education (2404.00024v1)

Published 20 Mar 2024 in cs.RO, cs.CY, and cs.HC

Abstract: Creating a standardized introduction course becomes more critical as the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) becomes more established. This paper outlines the key components necessary to provide an undergraduate with a sufficient foundational understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of this field and provides proposed course content. It emphasizes the importance of creating a course with theoretical and experimental components to accommodate all different learning preferences. This manuscript also advocates creating or adopting a universal platform to standardize the hands-on component of introductory HRI courses, regardless of university funding or size. Next, it recommends formal training in how to read scientific articles and staying up-to-date with the latest relevant papers. Finally, it provides detailed lecture content and project milestones for a 15-week semester. By creating a standardized course, researchers can ensure consistency and quality are maintained across institutions, which will help students as well as industrial and academic employers understand what foundational knowledge is expected.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Have I Got the Power? Analysing and Reporting Statistical Power in HRI. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11, 2, Article 16 (feb 2022), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495246
  2. Jacob Bishop and Matthew A Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, 23–1200.
  3. G*Power: Statistical Power Analyses for Mac and Windows. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower
  4. Uwe Gerecke and Bernardo Wagner. 2007. The challenges and benefits of using robots in higher education. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 13, 1 (2007), 29–43.
  5. Guy Hoffman and Xuan Zhao. 2020. A primer for conducting experiments in human–robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 1 (2020), 1–31.
  6. Srinivasan Keshav. 2007. How to read a paper. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37, 3 (2007), 83–84.
  7. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest 9, 3 (2008), 105–119.
  8. Laurel Riek and Don Howard. 2014. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. Proceedings of we robot (2014).
  9. Hello Robot. 2024. Stretch Research Edition. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://hello-robot.com/product
  10. UM Robotics. 2023. The MBot Ecosystem. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://mbot.robotics.umich.edu
  11. RobotLab. 2024. NAO Robot Power V6 Standard Edition for Research. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.robotlab.com/higher-ed-robots/store/nao-power-v6-standard-edition
  12. David Rose. 2000. Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology 15, 4 (2000), 47–51.
  13. Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In ACM SIGCHI/SIGART International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) (HRI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121249
  14. James E Stice. 1987. Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering education 77, 5 (1987), 291–96.
  15. The Robotics Debates Team. 2022. Debates on the Future of Robotics Research. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.roboticsdebates.org

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com