Hey, Teacher, (Don't) Leave Those Kids Alone: Standardizing HRI Education (2404.00024v1)
Abstract: Creating a standardized introduction course becomes more critical as the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) becomes more established. This paper outlines the key components necessary to provide an undergraduate with a sufficient foundational understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of this field and provides proposed course content. It emphasizes the importance of creating a course with theoretical and experimental components to accommodate all different learning preferences. This manuscript also advocates creating or adopting a universal platform to standardize the hands-on component of introductory HRI courses, regardless of university funding or size. Next, it recommends formal training in how to read scientific articles and staying up-to-date with the latest relevant papers. Finally, it provides detailed lecture content and project milestones for a 15-week semester. By creating a standardized course, researchers can ensure consistency and quality are maintained across institutions, which will help students as well as industrial and academic employers understand what foundational knowledge is expected.
- Have I Got the Power? Analysing and Reporting Statistical Power in HRI. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11, 2, Article 16 (feb 2022), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3495246
- Jacob Bishop and Matthew A Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, 23–1200.
- G*Power: Statistical Power Analyses for Mac and Windows. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower
- Uwe Gerecke and Bernardo Wagner. 2007. The challenges and benefits of using robots in higher education. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 13, 1 (2007), 29–43.
- Guy Hoffman and Xuan Zhao. 2020. A primer for conducting experiments in human–robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 1 (2020), 1–31.
- Srinivasan Keshav. 2007. How to read a paper. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37, 3 (2007), 83–84.
- Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest 9, 3 (2008), 105–119.
- Laurel Riek and Don Howard. 2014. A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. Proceedings of we robot (2014).
- Hello Robot. 2024. Stretch Research Edition. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://hello-robot.com/product
- UM Robotics. 2023. The MBot Ecosystem. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://mbot.robotics.umich.edu
- RobotLab. 2024. NAO Robot Power V6 Standard Edition for Research. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.robotlab.com/higher-ed-robots/store/nao-power-v6-standard-edition
- David Rose. 2000. Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology 15, 4 (2000), 47–51.
- Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In ACM SIGCHI/SIGART International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) (HRI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121241.1121249
- James E Stice. 1987. Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering education 77, 5 (1987), 291–96.
- The Robotics Debates Team. 2022. Debates on the Future of Robotics Research. Online. Retrieved Jan, 2024 from https://www.roboticsdebates.org