Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 187 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Identifying the electromagnetic counterparts of LISA massive black hole binaries in archival LSST data (2403.18751v1)

Published 27 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: The Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will catalogue the light-curves of up to 100 million quasars. Among these there can be up to approximately 100 ultra-compact massive black hole (MBH) binaries, which 5-15 years later can be detected in gravitational waves (GWs) by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Here we assume that GWs from a MBH binary have been detected by LISA, and we assess whether or not its electromagnetic (EM) counterpart can be uniquely identified in archival LSST data as a periodic quasar. We use the binary's properties derived from the LISA waveform, such as the past evolution of its orbital frequency, its total mass, distance and sky localization, to predict the redshift, magnitude and historical periodicity of the quasar expected in the archival LSST data. We then use Monte Carlo simulations to compute the false alarm probability, i.e. the number of quasars in the LSST catalogue matching these properties by chance, based on the (extrapolated) quasar luminosity function, the sampling cadence of LSST, and intrinsic ``damped random walk (DRW)" quasar variability. We perform our analysis on four fiducial LISA binaries, with total masses and redshifts of $(M_{\rm bin}/{\rm M_{\odot}},z) = (3\times105,0.3)$, $(3\times106,0.3)$, $(107,0.3)$ and $(107,1)$. While DRW noise and aliasing due to LSST's cadence can produce false periodicities by chance, we find that the frequency chirp of the LISA source during the LSST observations washes out these noise peaks and allows the genuine source to stand out in Lomb-Scargle periodograms. We find that all four fiducial binaries yield excellent chances to be uniquely identified, with false alarm probabilities below $10{-5}$, a week or more before their merger. This then enables deep follow-up EM observations targeting the individual EM counterparts during their inspiral stage.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com