Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Understanding the Impact of Referent Design on Scale Perception in Immersive Data Visualization (2403.16018v1)

Published 24 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Referents are often used to enhance scale perception in immersive visualizations. Common referent designs include the considerations of referent layout (side-by-side vs. in-situ) and referent size (small vs. medium vs. large). This paper introduces a controlled user study to assess how different referent designs affect the efficiency and accuracy of scale perception across different data scales, on the performance of the size-matching task in the virtual environment. Our results reveal that in-situ layouts significantly enhance accuracy and confidence across various data scales, particularly with large referents. Linear regression analyses further confirm that in-situ layouts exhibit greater resilience to changes in data scale. For tasks requiring efficiency, medium-sized referents emerge as the preferred choice. Based on these findings, we offer design guidelines for selecting referent layouts and sizes in immersive visualizations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Thinking Outside the Lab: VR Size & Depth Perception in the Wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00584 (2021).
  2. Exploring the design space of immersive urban analytics. Visual Informatics 1, 2 (2017), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2017.11.002
  3. Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2426–2435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.210
  4. Perceiving distance in virtual reality: theoretical insights from contemporary technologies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378, 1869 (2023), 20210456. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0456 arXiv:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.2021.0456
  5. Empirically Evaluating the Effects of Perceptual Information Channels on the Size Perception of Tangibles in Near-Field Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00086
  6. Velocity Constancy in a Virtual Reality Environment. Perception 29, 12 (2000), 1423–1435. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3115 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1068/p3115 PMID: 11257966.
  7. Ralph Norman Haber and Charles A Levin. 2001. The independence of size perception and distance perception. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 7 (2001), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194530
  8. Size and shape constancy in consumer virtual reality. Behavior Research Methods 52 (2020), 1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01336-9
  9. The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 111, 1 (2014), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00394.2013 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00394.2013 PMID: 24089402.
  10. Waqas Javed and Niklas Elmqvist. 2012. Exploring the design space of composite visualization. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2012.6183556
  11. Peripheral Stimulation and its Effect on Perceived Spatial Scale in Virtual Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 4 (2013), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.37
  12. Perceived Space in the HTC Vive. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 15, 1, Article 2 (jul 2017), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106155
  13. Size-Constancy in the CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16, 2 (04 2007), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.2.172
  14. In-situ or side-by-side? A user study on augmented reality maintenance instructions in blind areas. Computers in Industry 144 (2023), 103795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103795
  15. Data Visceralization: Enabling Deeper Understanding of Data Using Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (2021), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030435
  16. Design Patterns for Situated Visualization in Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 30, 1 (2024), 1324–1335. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327398
  17. Welcome to Wonderland: The Influence of the Size and Shape of a Virtual Hand On the Perceived Size and Shape of Virtual Objects. PLOS ONE 8, 7 (07 2013), null. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068594
  18. Pearl: Physical Environment based Augmented Reality Lenses for In-Situ Human Movement Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 381, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580715
  19. The Effects of Scene Complexity, Stereovision, and Motion Parallax on Size Constancy in a Virtual Environment. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2007.352464
  20. The relationship between the body and the environment in the virtual world: The interpupillary distance affects the body size perception. PLOS ONE 15, 4 (04 2020), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232290
  21. A Comparison of Spatiotemporal Visualizations for 3D Urban Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 1 (2023), 1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209474
  22. Effects of scale change on distance perception in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 8, 4, Article 26 (dec 2008), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043603.2043608
  23. Object Size Perception in Immersive Virtual Reality: Avatar Realism Affects the Way We Perceive. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 647–648. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446318
  24. Virtual Hand Realism Affects Object Size Perception in Body-Based Scaling. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798040
  25. Judgments of Object Size and Distance across Different Virtual Reality Environments: A Preliminary Study. Applied Sciences 11, 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311510
  26. The Plausibility Paradox for Resized Users in Virtual Environments. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.655744
  27. The Plausibility Paradox For Scaled-Down Users In Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00014
  28. Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378, 1869 (2023), 20210464. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0464
  29. Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? Presence 13, 5 (2004), 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746042545292
  30. Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size of the World. PLOS ONE 6, 5 (05 2011), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195
  31. Body size illusions influence perceived size of objects: a validation of previous research in virtual reality. Virtual Reality 24, 3 (2020), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00402-z
  32. Effects of View Layout on Situated Analytics for Multiple-View Representations in Immersive Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 1 (2023), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209475
  33. Comparing the Effects of Visual Realism on Size Perception in VR versus Real World Viewing through Physical and Verbal Judgments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2721–2731. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247109
  34. Embedded Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608
  35. Understanding 3D Data Videos: From Screens to Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis56936.2023.00029

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets