Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
116 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban Robots (2403.06774v1)

Published 4 Mar 2024 in cs.HC and cs.RO

Abstract: As intelligent agents transition from controlled to uncontrolled environments, they face challenges that sometimes exceed their operational capabilities. In many scenarios, they rely on assistance from bystanders to overcome those challenges. Using robots that get stuck in urban settings as an example, we investigate how agents can prompt bystanders into providing assistance. We conducted four focus group sessions with 17 participants that involved bodystorming, where participants assumed the role of robots and bystander pedestrians in role-playing activities. Generating insights from both assumed robot and bystander perspectives, we were able to identify potential non-verbal help-seeking strategies (i.e., addressing bystanders, cueing intentions, and displaying emotions) and factors shaping the assistive behaviours of bystanders. Drawing on these findings, we offer design considerations for help-seeking urban robots and other agents operating in uncontrolled environments to foster casual collaboration, encompass expressiveness, align with agent social categories, and curate appropriate incentives.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (100)
  1. Presenting and Exploring Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction Design Through Bodystorming. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62037-0_15
  2. Aino Ahtinen and Kirsikka Kaipainen. 2020. Learning and teaching experiences with a persuasive social robot in primary school–findings and implications from a 4-month field study. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, Virtual Event, 73–84.
  3. The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Nanjing, China, 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525516
  4. Dobrosovestnova Anna and Reinboth Tim. 2023. Helping-as-Work and Helping-as-Care: Mapping Ambiguities of Helping Commercial Delivery Robots. Social Robots in Social Institutions: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 366 (2023), 239. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220623
  5. Somebody help me, please?!” Interaction Design Framework for Needy Mobile Service Robots. In 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). IEEE, Genoa, Italy, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625721
  6. Robots And Racism. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171260
  7. Human-Agent Collaboration: Can an Agent Be a Partner?. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI EA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1289–1294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051138
  8. Timothy W. Bickmore and Rosalind W. Picard. 2005. Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (jun 2005), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867
  9. Polite and Unambiguous Requests Facilitate Willingness to Help an Autonomous Delivery Robot and Favourable Social Attributions. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Naples, Italy, 1620–1626. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870
  10. Human-agent interaction. Handbook of human-machine interaction null (2017), 283–302.
  11. Michael E Bratman. 1992. Shared cooperative activity. The philosophical review 101, 2 (1992), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  13. Needy Robots - Designing Requests for Help Using Insights from Social Psychology. In 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). IEEE, Genoa, Italy, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625724
  14. Help! I Can’t Reach the Buttons: Facilitating Helping Behaviors Towards Robots. In Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems, Stuart P. Wilson, Paul F.M.J. Verschure, Anna Mura, and Tony J. Prescott (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 354–358.
  15. Elizabeth Cha and Maja Matarić. 2016. Using nonverbal signals to request help during human-robot collaboration. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, Daejeon, South Korea, 5070–5076. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759744
  16. Usage intention of social robots for domestic purpose: From security, privacy, and legal perspectives. Information Systems Frontiers 26 (2021), 1–16.
  17. ”How are you today, Panda the Robot?” – Affectiveness, Playfulness and Relatedness in Human-Robot Collaboration in the Factory Context. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Waterloo, Canada, 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515351
  18. Nazli Cila. 2022. Designing Human-Agent Collaborations: Commitment, Responsiveness, and Support. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 420, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517500
  19. Products as Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the IoT Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025797
  20. Prompting Prosocial Human Interventions in Response to Robot Mistreatment. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374781
  21. Paul Coulton and Joseph Galen Lindley. 2019. More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things. The Design Journal 22, 4 (2019), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320
  22. Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2853–2862. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702176
  23. Crowdsourcing urban form and function. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 29, 5 (2015), 720–741.
  24. Wizard of Oz studies: why and how. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Orlando, Florida, USA) (IUI ’93). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/169891.169968
  25. Robots in Need: How Patterns of Emotional Behavior Influence Willingness to Help. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378301
  26. Anna Dobrosovestnova and Tim Reinboth. 2023. Helping-as-Work and Helping-as-Care: Mapping Ambiguities of Helping Commercial Delivery Robots. Social Robots in Social Institutions: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 366 (2023), 239. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220623
  27. With a Little Help of Humans. An Exploratory Study of Delivery Robots Stuck in Snow. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Virtual Event, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900588
  28. Becoming a Robot - Overcoming Anthropomorphism with Techno-Mimesis. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376507
  29. Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor’s voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 90 (2019), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027
  30. Friederike Eyssel and Frank Hegel. 2012. (s) he’s got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 9 (2012), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x
  31. Observed sidewalk autonomous delivery robot interactions with pedestrians and bicyclists. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 18 (2023), 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100789
  32. Petra Gemeinboeck and Rob Saunders. 2017. Movement Matters: How a Robot Becomes Body. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing (London, United Kingdom) (MOCO ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077981.3078035
  33. Petra Gemeinboeck and Rob Saunders. 2018. Human-Robot Kinesthetics: Mediating Kinesthetic Experience for Designing Affective Non-humanlike Social Robots. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Nanjing, China, 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525596
  34. Petra Gemeinboeck and Rob Saunders. 2023. Dancing with the Nonhuman: A Feminist, Embodied, Material Inquiry into the Making of Human-Robot Relationships. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580036
  35. Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström. 2020. Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues 36, 4 (2020), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612
  36. Desiree Godin and Mansour Zahedi. 2014. Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review. In Design’s Big Debates - DRS International Conference 2014, Youn-Kyung Lim, Kristina Niedderer, Johan Redstrom, Erik Stolterman, and Anu Valtonen (Eds.). Design Research Society, Umea, Sweden, null. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2014/researchpapers/85
  37. Greg P Griffin and Junfeng Jiao. 2019. Crowdsourcing bike share station locations: Evaluating participation and placement. Journal of the American Planning Association 85, 1 (2019), 35–48.
  38. Ed Groff. 1995. Laban movement analysis: Charting the ineffable domain of human movement. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 66, 2 (1995), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1995.10607038
  39. Industrial robotics. Springer handbook of robotics null (2016), 1385–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_54
  40. A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Paris, France, 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343887
  41. Fritz Heider and Marianne Simmel. 1944. An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American journal of psychology 57, 2 (1944), 243–259.
  42. Michael A. Hogg. 2016. Social Identity Theory. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1
  43. Stop and Smell the Chalk Flowers: A Robotic Probe for Investigating Urban Interaction with Physicalised Displays. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376676
  44. What Will It Take to Help a Stuck Robot? Exploring Signaling Methods for a Mobile Robot. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’22). IEEE Press, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 797–801.
  45. Helge Hüttenrauch and Kerstin Severinson Eklundh. 2003. To help or not to help a service robot. In The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. IEEE, Millbrae, CA, USA, 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251875
  46. Autonomous robotic street sweeping: Initial attempt for curbside sweeping. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 72–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2017.7889234
  47. Coactive Design: Designing Support for Interdependence in Joint Activity. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 3, 1 (feb 2014), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Johnson
  48. Matthew Johnson and Alonso Vera. 2019. No AI Is an Island: The Case for Teaming Intelligence. AI Magazine 40, 1 (Mar. 2019), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i1.2842
  49. Initiating interactions in order to get help: Effects of social framing on people’s responses to robots’ requests for assistance. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Edinburgh, Scotland, 999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926383
  50. Kacie Kinzer. 2009. Tweenbots. http://www.tweenbots.com/ Accessed: August,2023.
  51. Recovering from Failure by Asking for Help. Auton. Robots 39, 3 (oct 2015), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015-9460-1
  52. Hideyuki Kobayashi and Shunji Ota. 2000. The semantic network of KANSEI words. Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. ’cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions’ (cat. no.0 1 (2000), 690–694 vol.1. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:30966513
  53. Lenneke Kuijer and Elisa Giaccardi. 2018. Co-Performance: Conceptualizing the Role of Artificial Agency in the Design of Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173699
  54. What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. In 2013 IEEE RO-MAN. IEEE, Gyeongju, South Korea, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628441
  55. Expressing Robot Incapability. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171276
  56. Deep learning. nature 521, 7553 (2015), 436–444.
  57. The Unboxing Experience: Exploration and Design of Initial Interactions Between Children and Social Robots. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 151, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501955
  58. Wen-Ying Lee and Malte Jung. 2020. Ludic-HRI: Designing Playful Experiences with Robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 582–584. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3377429
  59. Lessons From a Robot Asking for Directions In-the-Wild. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580159
  60. Robot citizenship: A design perspective. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement 87 (2019), 81–89.
  61. Comparing Social Robot, Screen and Voice Interfaces for Smart-Home Control. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 580–628. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025786
  62. Research through Design Approaches in Human-Robot Interaction. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 685–687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3444868
  63. Human–Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585
  64. Betti Marenko and Philip Van Allen. 2016. Animistic design: how to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman. Digital Creativity 27, 1 (2016), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2016.1145127
  65. Patterns of Effective Human-Agent Teams. In CHI ’23 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 224, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585608
  66. Mitsuo Nagamachi. 1995. Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15, 1 (1995), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5 Kansei Engineering: An Ergonomic Technology for product development.
  67. Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, New York.
  68. A Design Methodology for Abstracting Character Archetypes onto Robotic Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing (Genoa, Italy) (MOCO ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212721.3212809
  69. Triin Palmipuu. 2021. Pelgulinlane Taivo aitab iga päev pakiroboteid: nad paluvad nii härdalt abi. postimees. https://naine.postimees.ee/7406578/pelgulinlane-taivo-aitab-iga-paevpakiroboteid-nad-paluvad-nii-hardalt-abi Accessed:2023.
  70. Designing Better Human-Robot Interactions Through Enactment, Engagement, and Reflection. In Proceedings of the CUI@ HRI Workshop at the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’23). ACM/IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden, null.
  71. Ready for robots? Assessment of autonomous delivery robot operative accessibility in German cities. Journal of Urban Mobility 2 (2022), 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100036
  72. Isabel Prochner and Danny Godin. 2022. Quality in research through design projects: Recommendations for evaluation and enhancement. Design Studies 78 (2022), 101061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101061
  73. Empathizing with robots: Fellow feeling along the anthropomorphic spectrum. In 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops. IEEE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2009.5349423
  74. Is someone in this office available to help me? Proactively seeking help from spatially-situated humans. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 66 (2012), 205–221.
  75. The Forgotten in HRI: Incidental Encounters with Robots in Public Spaces. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656–657. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3374852
  76. Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy. Science Robotics 3, 19 (2018), eaao6760.
  77. Robots moving out of the laboratory - detecting interaction levels and human contact in noisy school environments. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759). IEEE, Kurashiki, Okayama Japan, 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374822
  78. Pericle Salvini. 2018. Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 100 (2018), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.007
  79. Diffraction-in-Action: Designerly Explorations of Agential Realism Through Lived Data. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 540, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502029
  80. Bodystorming as Embodied Designing. Interactions 17, 6 (nov 2010), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/1865245.1865256
  81. Voice in Human–Agent Interaction: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 4, Article 81 (may 2021), 43 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386867
  82. Thomas B. Sheridan. 2016. Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges. Human Factors 58, 4 (2016), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364 PMID: 27098262.
  83. Ben Shneiderman and Catherine Plaisant. 2010. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education India, India.
  84. David Harris Smith and Frauke Zeller. 2017. The Death and Lives of hitchBOT: The Design and Implementation of a Hitchhiking Robot. Leonardo 50, 1 (02 2017), 77–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01354
  85. Katta Spiel and Lennart E. Nacke. 2020. What Is It Like to Be a Game?—Object Oriented Inquiry for Games Research, Design, and Evaluation. Frontiers in Computer Science 2 (2020), 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00018
  86. Vasant Srinivasan and Leila Takayama. 2016. Help Me Please: Robot Politeness Strategies for Soliciting Help From Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4945–4955. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858217
  87. Konrad Szocik and Rakhat Abylkasymova. 2022. Ethical Issues in Police Robots. The Case of Crowd Control Robots in a Pandemic. Journal of Applied Security Research 17, 4 (2022), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1923365
  88. Martin Tomitsch. 2017. Making Cities Smarter. JOVIS Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
  89. Martin Tomitsch and Marius Hoggenmueller. 2021. Designing Human–Machine Interactions in the Automated City: Methodologies, Considerations, Principles. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_2
  90. Manuela M. Veloso. 2018. The Increasingly Fascinating Opportunity for Human-Robot-AI Interaction: The CoBot Mobile Service Robots. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 7, 1, Article 5 (may 2018), 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209541
  91. Use of Virtual Reality for the Evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction Systems in Complex Scenarios. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Nanjing, China, 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525738
  92. Sharing the Sidewalk: Observing Delivery Robot Interactions with Pedestrians during a Pilot in Pittsburgh, PA. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 7, 5 (2023), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050053
  93. Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’10). IEEE Press, Osaka, Japan, 23–30.
  94. Embodied Design Ideation Methods: Analysing the Power of Estrangement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5158–5170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025873
  95. On the flexibility of robot social identity performance: benefits, ethical risks and open research questions for HRI. In HRI Workshop on Robo-Identity. ACM, Virtual Event, Boulder, CO, USA, 4 pages.
  96. F.H. Wullschleger and R. Brega. 2002. The paradox of service robots-how passers-by can contribute in solving non-deterministic exceptional conditions encountered by service robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol. 2. IEEE, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1126–1131 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRDS.2002.1043882
  97. Wei Xu. 2020. From Automation to Autonomy and Autonomous Vehicles: Challenges and Opportunities for Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions 28, 1 (dec 2020), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434580
  98. A Simple Nod of the Head: The Effect of Minimal Robot Movements on Children’s Perception of a Low-Anthropomorphic Robot. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025995
  99. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
  100. Oren Zuckerman and Guy Hoffman. 2015. Empathy Objects: Robotic Devices as Conversation Companions. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2688805
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets