Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Encouraging Bystander Assistance for Urban Robots: Introducing Playful Robot Help-Seeking as a Strategy (2405.18951v1)

Published 29 May 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Robots in urban environments will inevitably encounter situations beyond their capabilities (e.g., delivery robots unable to press traffic light buttons), necessitating bystander assistance. These spontaneous collaborations possess challenges distinct from traditional human-robot collaboration, requiring design investigation and tailored interaction strategies. This study investigates playful help-seeking as a strategy to encourage such bystander assistance. We compared our designed playful help-seeking concepts against two existing robot help-seeking strategies: verbal speech and emotional expression. To assess these strategies and their impact on bystanders' experience and attitudes towards urban robots, we conducted a virtual reality evaluation study with 24 participants. Playful help-seeking enhanced people's willingness to help robots, a tendency more pronounced in scenarios requiring greater physical effort. Verbal help-seeking was perceived less polite, raising stronger discomfort assessments. Emotional expression help-seeking elicited empathy while leading to lower cognitive trust. The triangulation of quantitative and qualitative results highlights considerations for robot help-seeking from bystanders.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (96)
  1. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots 42 (2018), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2
  2. Findings From A Qualitative Field Study with An Autonomous Robot in Public: Exploration of User Reactions and Conflicts. International Journal of Social Robotics 14, 7 (2022), 1625–1655.
  3. Somebody help me, please?!” Interaction Design Framework for Needy Mobile Service Robots. In 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). IEEE, Genova, Italy, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625721
  4. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics 1 (2009), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
  5. Polite and Unambiguous Requests Facilitate Willingness to Help an Autonomous Delivery Robot and Favourable Social Attributions. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Naples, Italy, 1620–1626. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900870
  6. Piggybacking Robots: Human-Robot Overtrust in University Dormitory Security. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020211
  7. James V Bradley. 1958. Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 53, 282 (1958), 525–528.
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Escaping from Children’s Abuse of Social Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696468
  10. Trash Barrel Robots in the City. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Stockholm¡/city¿, ¡country¿Sweden¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 875–877. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580206
  11. Needy Robots - Designing Requests for Help Using Insights from Social Psychology. In 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO). IEEE Press, Genova, Italy, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625724
  12. Help! I Can’t Reach the Buttons: Facilitating Helping Behaviors Towards Robots. In Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems, Stuart P. Wilson, Paul F.M.J. Verschure, Anna Mura, and Tony J. Prescott (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 354–358.
  13. The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020208
  14. Learning waste Recycling by playing with a Social Robot. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, Bari, Italy, 3805–3810. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2019.8914455
  15. Elizabeth Cha and Maja Matarić. 2016. Using nonverbal signals to request help during human-robot collaboration. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, Daejeon, Korea, 5070–5076. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759744
  16. Gamified Educational Robots Lead an Increase in Motivation and Creativity in STEM Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education 22, 3 (2023), 427–438.
  17. Helper’s High with a Robot Pet. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447165
  18. ”How are you today, Panda the Robot?” – Affectiveness, Playfulness and Relatedness in Human-Robot Collaboration in the Factory Context. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Vancouver, Canada, 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515351
  19. Nazli Cila. 2022. Designing Human-Agent Collaborations: Commitment, Responsiveness, and Support. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 420, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517500
  20. Prompting Prosocial Human Interventions in Response to Robot Mistreatment. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374781
  21. John W. Creswell. 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
  22. Russell Cropanzano and Marie S. Mitchell. 2005. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management 31, 6 (2005), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  23. Robots in Need: How Patterns of Emotional Behavior Influence Willingness to Help. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378301
  24. With a Little Help of Humans. An Exploratory Study of Delivery Robots Stuck in Snow. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE Press, Napoli, Italy, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900588
  25. Social Robots and Gamification for technology supported learning: An empirical study on engagement and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior 121 (03 2021), 106792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106792
  26. Julian Dubbell. 2015. Invisible labor, invisible play: Online gold farming and the boundary between jobs and games. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 18 (2015), 419.
  27. A robot goes to rehab: a novel gamified system for long-term stroke rehabilitation using a socially assistive robot—methodology and usability testing. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 18, 1 (28 Jul 2021), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00915-2
  28. Initiating interactions in order to get help: Effects of social framing on people’s responses to robots’ requests for assistance. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Edinburgh, Scotland, 999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926383
  29. Observed sidewalk autonomous delivery robot interactions with pedestrians and bicyclists. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 18 (2023), 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100789
  30. Toward Virtual Reality-based Evaluation of Robot Navigation among People. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, Atlanta, USA, 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00100
  31. R Hakli et al. 2023. Helping-as-Work and Helping-as-Care: Mapping Ambiguities of Helping Commercial Delivery Robots. Social Robots in Social Institutions: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 366 (2023), 239. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220623
  32. The three paradigms of HCI. In Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems San Jose, California, USA. ACM, California, USA, 1–18.
  33. Drone in Love: Emotional Perception of Facial Expressions on Flying Robots. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Yokohama¡/city¿, ¡country¿Japan¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 716, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445495
  34. Thomas Hoffmann and Gunnar Prause. 2018. On the Regulatory Framework for Last-Mile Delivery Robots. Machines 6, 3 (2018), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines6030033
  35. Stop and Smell the Chalk Flowers: A Robotic Probe for Investigating Urban Interaction with Physicalised Displays. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA,) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376676
  36. Understanding Artefact and Process Challenges for Designing Low-Res Lighting Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Montreal QC¡/city¿, ¡country¿Canada¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173833
  37. Eliciting New Perspectives in RtD Studies through Annotated Portfolios: A Case Study of Robotic Artefacts. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1875–1886. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462134
  38. Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 370, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445159
  39. What Will It Take to Help a Stuck Robot? Exploring Signaling Methods for a Mobile Robot. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’22). IEEE Press, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 797–801.
  40. H. Huttenrauch and K.S. Eklundh. 2003. To help or not to help a service robot. In The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. IEEE, California, USA, 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251875
  41. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International journal of cognitive ergonomics 4, 1 (2000), 53–71.
  42. Kacie Kinzer. Y2009. Tweenbots. http://www.tweenbots.com/ Accessed: August,2023.
  43. Recovering from failure by asking for help. Autonomous Robots 39 (2015), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015-9460-1
  44. Lenneke Kuijer and Elisa Giaccardi. 2018. Co-Performance: Conceptualizing the Role of Artificial Agency in the Design of Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173699
  45. The moderating role of helper’s high in anchoring process: An empirical investigation in the context of charity website design. Computers in Human Behavior 84 (2018), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.024
  46. Expressing Robot Incapability. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171276
  47. Design for serendipitous interaction: BubbleBot - bringing people together with bubbles. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’19). IEEE Press, Daegu, Republic of Korea, 759–760.
  48. Wen-Ying Lee and Malte Jung. 2020. Ludic-HRI: Designing Playful Experiences with Robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 582–584. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3377429
  49. Emotional Experience in Human–Robot Collaboration: Suitability of Virtual Reality Scenarios to Study Interactions beyond Safety Restrictions. Robotics 12, 6 (2023), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12060168
  50. Lessons From a Robot Asking for Directions In-the-Wild. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580159
  51. Christopher D Lorish and Richard Maisiak. 1986. The face scale: a brief, nonverbal method for assessing patient mood. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology 29, 7 (1986), 906–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290714
  52. Maria Luce Lupetti. 2016. Designing Playful HRI: Acceptability of Robots in Everyday Life through Play. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI ’16). IEEE Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, 631–632.
  53. Maria Luce Lupetti. 2020. Shybo – Design of a research artefact for human-robot interaction studies. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 9, 1 (Mar. 2020), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v9i1.303
  54. Robot citizenship: A design perspective. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement 87 (2019), 81–89.
  55. Design and Evaluation of a Mixed-Reality Playground for Child-Robot Games. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 4 (2018), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040069
  56. Maria Luce Lupetti and Maarten Van Mechelen. 2022. Promoting Children’s Critical Thinking Towards Robotics through Robot Deception. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’22). IEEE Press, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 588–597.
  57. Daily Mail. 2023. Pictured: Delivery robots queue patiently to use pedestrian crossing in Cambridge. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11497909/Pictured-Delivery-robots-queue-patiently-use-pedestrian-crossing-Cambridge.html Accessed on January 28, 2024.
  58. Bertram F Malle and Daniel Ullman. 2023. Measuring Human-Robot Trust with the MDMT (Multi-Dimensional Measure of Trust). arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14887 null (2023), 1–3.
  59. Betti Marenko and Philip Van Allen. 2016. Animistic design: how to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman. Digital Creativity 27, 1 (2016), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2016.1145127
  60. Daniel J. McAllister. 1995. Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1995), 24–59. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:32041515
  61. Studying Multi-modal Human Robot Interaction Using a Mobile VR Simulation. In Human-Computer Interaction, Masaaki Kurosu and Ayako Hashizume (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 140–155.
  62. Modeling Human Helpfulness with Individual and Contextual Factors for Robot Planning.. In Robotics: Science and Systems. Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation, virtual, 1–11.
  63. Engaging Passers-by with Rhythm: Applying Feedforward Learning to a Xylophonic Media Architecture Facade. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Hamburg¡/city¿, ¡country¿Germany¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 182, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580761
  64. Triin Palmipuu. 2021. Pelgulinlane Taivo aitab iga päev pakiroboteid: nad paluvad nii härdalt abi. https://naine.postimees.ee/7406578/pelgulinlane-taivo-aitab-iga-paevpakiroboteid-nad-paluvad-nii-hardalt-abi Accessed:2023.
  65. Encountering Autonomous Robots on Public Streets. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Boulder¡/city¿, ¡state¿CO¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (HRI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3634936
  66. Integration of a social robot and gamification in adult learning and effects on motivation, engagement and performance. AI & SOCIETY 1, 39 (25 Jun 2022), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01514-y
  67. Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons 58, 4 (2015), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.006
  68. Is someone in this office available to help me? Proactively seeking help from spatially-situated humans. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 66 (2012), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9610-4
  69. The Forgotten in HRI: Incidental Encounters with Robots in Public Spaces. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656–657. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3374852
  70. Pericle Salvini. 2018. Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 100 (2018), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.007
  71. How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Viareggio, Italy, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5654677
  72. Allison Sauppé and Bilge Mutlu. 2015. The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3613–3622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702181
  73. Domestic Robots and the Dream of Automation: Understanding Human Interaction and Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Yokohama¡/city¿, ¡country¿Japan¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 241, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445629
  74. Design and evaluation of a short version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 6 (2017), 103. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001
  75. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696461
  76. David Harris Smith and Frauke Zeller. 2017. The Death and Lives of hitchBOT: The Design and Implementation of a Hitchhiking Robot. Leonardo 50, 1 (02 2017), 77–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01354
  77. Vasant Srinivasan and Leila Takayama. 2016. Help Me Please: Robot Politeness Strategies for Soliciting Help From Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4945–4955. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858217
  78. Inducing Bystander Interventions During Robot Abuse with Social Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171247
  79. Martin Tomitsch. 2014. Towards the real-time city: An investigation of public displays for behaviour change and sustainable living. In 7th making cities livable conference. Association for Sustainability in Business, NSW, Australia, 1–19.
  80. Gustavo Fortes Tondello. 2016. An introduction to gamification in human-computer interaction. XRDS 23, 1 (sep 2016), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983457
  81. Jacqueline Urakami. 2023. Do Emotional Robots Get More Help? How a Robots Emotions Affect Collaborators Willingness to Help. International Journal of Social Robotics 15, 9 (2023), 1457–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01058-1
  82. Designing an expressive head for a help requesting socially assistive robot. In Human-Friendly Robotics 2019: 12th International Workshop. Springer, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42026-0_7
  83. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 5, 1 (1997), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
  84. Manuela M. Veloso. 2018. The Increasingly Fascinating Opportunity for Human-Robot-AI Interaction: The CoBot Mobile Service Robots. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 7, 1, Article 5 (may 2018), 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209541
  85. Exploring human-robot cooperation with gamified user training: a user study on cooperative lifting. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10 (2024), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1290104
  86. Use of Virtual Reality for the Evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction Systems in Complex Scenarios. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Nanjing, China, 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525738
  87. Sharing the Sidewalk: Observing Delivery Robot Interactions with Pedestrians during a Pilot in Pittsburgh, PA. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 7, 5 (2023), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050053
  88. Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’10). IEEE Press, Osaka, Japan, 23–30.
  89. STB: human-dependent sociable trash box. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’10). IEEE Press, Osaka, Japan, 197–198.
  90. The Future of Home Appliances: A Study on the Robotic Toaster as a Domestic Social Robot. In 2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Busan, Korea, 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309555
  91. Your Way Or My Way: Improving Human-Robot Co-Navigation Through Robot Intent and Pedestrian Prediction Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576992
  92. From Agent Autonomy to Casual Collaboration: A Design Investigation on Help-Seeking Urban Robots. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642389
  93. Help-Giving Robot Behaviors in Child-Robot Games: Exploring Semantic Free Utterances. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI ’16). IEEE Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, 541–542.
  94. Shujie Zhou and Leimin Tian. 2020. Would you help a sad robot? Influence of robots’ emotional expressions on human-multi-robot collaboration. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, Naples, Italy, 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223524
  95. Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1129294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294
  96. Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults’ Feelings of ”Being-Seen”. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (¡conf-loc¿, ¡city¿Honolulu¡/city¿, ¡state¿HI¡/state¿, ¡country¿USA¡/country¿, ¡/conf-loc¿) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376411
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets