Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Many-Body Physics Calculations with Large Language Models (2403.03154v2)

Published 5 Mar 2024 in physics.comp-ph, cond-mat.other, and cs.AI

Abstract: LLMs have demonstrated an unprecedented ability to perform complex tasks in multiple domains, including mathematical and scientific reasoning. We demonstrate that with carefully designed prompts, LLMs can accurately carry out key calculations in research papers in theoretical physics. We focus on a broadly used approximation method in quantum physics: the Hartree-Fock method, requiring an analytic multi-step calculation deriving approximate Hamiltonian and corresponding self-consistency equations. To carry out the calculations using LLMs, we design multi-step prompt templates that break down the analytic calculation into standardized steps with placeholders for problem-specific information. We evaluate GPT-4's performance in executing the calculation for 15 research papers from the past decade, demonstrating that, with correction of intermediate steps, it can correctly derive the final Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian in 13 cases and makes minor errors in 2 cases. Aggregating across all research papers, we find an average score of 87.5 (out of 100) on the execution of individual calculation steps. Overall, the requisite skill for doing these calculations is at the graduate level in quantum condensed matter theory. We further use LLMs to mitigate the two primary bottlenecks in this evaluation process: (i) extracting information from papers to fill in templates and (ii) automatic scoring of the calculation steps, demonstrating good results in both cases. The strong performance is the first step for developing algorithms that automatically explore theoretical hypotheses at an unprecedented scale.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 1877–1901 (2020).
  2. Shazeer, N. et al. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538 (2017).
  3. Anil, R. et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403 (2023).
  4. Touvron, H. et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 (2023).
  5. Aarohi, S. e. a. Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023). URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=uyTL5Bvosj.
  6. Lewkowycz, A. et al. Solving quantitative reasoning problems with language models. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D. & Cho, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2022). URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=IFXTZERXdM7.
  7. Examining the potential and pitfalls of chatgpt in science and engineering problem-solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08773 (2023).
  8. Chen, M. et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 (2021).
  9. Ai-assisted coding: Experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13187 (2023).
  10. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature 620, 172–180 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2.
  11. Capabilities of gpt-4 on medical challenge problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13375 (2023).
  12. Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05332 (2023).
  13. Romera-Paredes, B. et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature 1–3 (2023).
  14. Kaplan, J. et al. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 (2020).
  15. Hoffmann, J. et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556 (2022).
  16. Achiam, J. et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023).
  17. Team, G. et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 (2023).
  18. Hugging Face. LMSys Chatbot Arena Leaderboard. https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard (2024).
  19. Hendrycks, D. et al. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 (2020).
  20. Gpt-4 passes the bar exam. Available at SSRN 4389233 (2023).
  21. We focus solely on LLMs available via model APIs and not on LLMs and foundational models trained or tuned on domain specific data.
  22. The impact of large language models on scientific discovery: a preliminary study using gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07361 (2023).
  23. Lála, J. et al. Paperqa: Retrieval-augmented generative agent for scientific research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07559 (2023).
  24. Hendrycks, D. et al. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03874 (2021).
  25. Cobbe, K. et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 (2021).
  26. Do large language models understand chemistry? a conversation with chatgpt. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 63, 1649–1655 (2023).
  27. White, A. D. et al. Assessment of chemistry knowledge in large language models that generate code. Digital Discovery 2, 368–376 (2023).
  28. Chemcrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05376 (2023).
  29. Lu, P. et al. Chameleon: Plug-and-play compositional reasoning with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09842 (2023).
  30. Shen, Y. et al. Hugginggpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in huggingface. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17580 (2023).
  31. Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature 625, 476–482 (2024).
  32. Taylor, R. et al. Galactica: A large language model for science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09085 (2022).
  33. Condensed matter field theory (Cambridge university press, 2010).
  34. Over 6456 papers mention Hartree-Fock in the abstract of papers in the cond-mat arXiv preprint server over the last decade.
  35. See supplemental information for the paper.
  36. Topological phases in ab-stacked mote2/wse2subscriptmote2subscriptwse2{\mathrm{mote}}_{2}/{\mathrm{wse}}_{2}roman_mote start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_wse start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: 𝕫2subscript𝕫2{\mathbb{z}}_{2}blackboard_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT topological insulators, chern insulators, and topological charge density waves. Physical Review Letters 129, 056804 (2022). eprint 2111.01152.
  37. Evaluations were carried out using checkpoints ‘gpt-4’ and ‘gpt-4-0613’ referenced in https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4-and-gpt-4-turbo. At the time that the experiments in the paper were performed, ‘gpt-4’ pointed to ‘gpt-4-0613’. The abstract to execution experiment was performed using GPT-4 queried via the web interface.
  38. Competing magnetic states in transition metal dichalcogenide moir\’e materials. Physical Review B 104, 214403 (2021). eprint 2108.02159.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that GPT-4, with minimal intermediate corrections, accurately derives Hartree-Fock Hamiltonians from research contexts.
  • It introduces a multi-step prompt template that systematically breaks down complex quantum many-body calculations into clear, executable steps.
  • The study achieved an average score of 87.5 out of 100 over 15 papers, highlighting the potential for automating routine theoretical physics tasks.

Quantum Many-Body Physics Calculations with LLMs: An Analysis

The paper "Quantum Many-Body Physics Calculations with LLMs" presents a compelling paper on utilizing LLMs, particularly GPT-4, for addressing theoretical physics challenges, specifically within the context of quantum many-body physics. The authors investigate whether LLMs can effectively assist theoretical physicists by automating the execution of complex calculations traditionally requiring expert-level human reasoning and specialization. The Hartree-Fock (HF) method, a widely used approximation technique in quantum physics, serves as the focal point for this investigation.

The authors demonstrate that with carefully structured prompts, GPT-4 can precisely carry out critical calculations in numerous research papers, specifically deriving Hartree-Fock Hamiltonians from given contexts. A multi-step prompt template is designed to break down the analytic calculation into standardized steps, allowing the model to handle the sophisticated mathematical reasoning inherent to the HF method. Through their methodology, the researchers analyzed 15 research papers, finding that GPT-4, with minimal corrections in intermediate steps, correctly derived the final Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian in 13 instances, with the model achieving an average score of 87.5 out of 100 when evaluated on performing individual calculation steps. These results are notable, especially given that the skills required align with graduate-level quantum condensed matter theory expertise.

The implications of this work extend to both practical and theoretical domains. Practically, the application of LLMs in executing HF calculations introduces an opportunity to automate parts of the theoretical research process, traditionally viewed as inherently human and creative. This could significantly expedite the exploration of new quantum systems and interactions by reducing the manual effort required for routine calculations. Theoretically, this work raises interesting questions about the future of AI in specialized scientific settings. It challenges the notion of the human-exclusive component in scientific reasoning and suggests a roadmap where AI could play a more prominent role in forming hypotheses and interpreting complex theoretical frameworks.

The authors also tackle two primary bottleneck areas in leveraging LLMs for HF calculations: extracting relevant information from papers to populate template placeholders and automatic scoring of calculation steps. They demonstrate notable success in both areas, highlighting the potential of LLMs not just in calculations but also in the ancillary tasks necessary for such computations to be carried out successfully in an automated environment.

Future research could explore several extensions and improvements upon this foundational work. Fine-tuning LLMs specifically for domain knowledge in quantum many-body calculations might enhance their precision and reliability. Additionally, integrating LLMs with computational tools could enable a seamless transition between language processing, symbolic mathematics, and numerical computations, further broadening their utility in scientific research.

While the paper does not involve groundbreaking new methodologies in AI, it does establish a novel application of existing technologies in a specialized field, presenting a significant step toward automating parts of theoretical physics research. This opens avenues for further exploration of how AI can augment human capability in understanding and exploring complex scientific phenomena, potentially reshaping the landscape of research and discovery in theoretical physics.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown